Extensive research has identified enterovirus (EV) infections as key environmental triggers of type 1 diabetes. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms via which EVs contribute to the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes remain unclear. Given that EVs dysregulate host microRNAs (miRNAs), which function as key regulators of β-cell biology, we investigated the impact of coxsackievirus B5 (CVB5) infection on the cellular expression of miRNAs within human islets. Using high-throughput quantitative PCR nanofluidics arrays, the expression of 754 miRNAs was examined in CVB5-infected human pancreatic islets. In total, 33 miRNAs were significantly dysregulated (≥ threefold difference) in the infected compared with control islets (P < 0.05). Subsequently, these differentially expressed miRNAs were predicted to target mRNAs of 57 known type 1 diabetes risk genes that collectively mediate various biological processes, including the regulation of cell proliferation, cytokine production, the innate immune response, and apoptosis. In conclusion, we report the first global miRNA expression profiling of CVB5-infected human pancreatic islets. We propose that EVs disrupt the miRNA-directed suppression of proinflammatory factors within β-cells, thereby resulting in an exacerbated antiviral immune response that promotes β-cell destruction and eventual type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is an immune-mediated disease resulting from the complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors. The role of enteroviruses (EVs) as key triggers of this disease has been heavily debated due to the lack of unequivocal proof that EVs serve as causal agents, despite significant associations between EV infection and islet autoimmunity (odds ratio 3.7) and clinical type 1 diabetes (odds ratio 9.8) (1). Among EV strains implicated with this disease, coxsackievirus B (CVB) group has been studied most extensively. Multiple mechanisms by which CVB might initiate and/or accelerate autoimmunity have been proposed, including direct induction of β-cell death, promotion of inflammatory cytokine production, activation of toll-like receptors (TLRs), molecular mimicry, and most recently, dysregulation of host microRNAs (miRNAs) (2,3).

Sized between 20 and 22 nucleotides, miRNAs are noncoding RNAs that function as potent regulators of gene expression (4). Derived from sequential processing of longer precursor transcripts, they load Argonaute proteins to mediate either destabilization or translational inhibition of target mRNAs. Sequence specificity of this control is provided by the complementary base pairing between the miRNA and mRNA, usually within its 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR).

Growing evidence supports pivotal roles of miRNAs in β-cell biology, including regulation of differentiation, glucose sensing, insulin exocytosis, inflammation, and apoptosis (3,57). Moreover, a number of miRNAs have been identified as components of pathways initiated by or contributing to the pathogenesis of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes (3). Therefore, it can be anticipated that changes in miRNA activities elicited by environmental exposures contribute significantly to the initiation and acceleration of islet autoimmunity.

To date, very few studies have examined global miRNA expression in the pancreas and none in CVB-infected human β-cells. In fact, only one study has investigated the effect of CVB infection on pancreatic miRNA expression, using rat β-cells (8). Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify miRNAs dysregulated in CVB5-infected human pancreatic islets and investigate whether they target genes associated with risk of type 1 diabetes.

CVB5 Infection

Human cadaveric pancreatic islets from two anonymous donors were cultured separately and infected with one clinical CVB5 strain (GenBank accession no. GQ126860.1) at 1 multiplicity of infection (MOI), as previously described (9). MOI was optimized to ensure >95% viability of cells in culture after viral exposure using the trypan blue dye exclusion test. Cells were harvested at 1, 4, and 7 days postinfection (dpi) and stored in TRI Reagent (Ambion) at −80°C.

miRNA Profiling

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and preamplification were performed as previously described (10). Human Pool A v2.1 and B v3.0 Megaplex stem-loop RT Primers (Applied Biosystems) were used to produce cDNA. After preamplification, cDNA was diluted (1:40), combined with an equal volume of Master Mix, and loaded onto the TaqMan OpenArray Real-Time PCR Plates containing 754 miRNA assays. Plates were analyzed on the QuantStudio 12k Flex Real-Time PCR System using recommended settings. For each batch of human islets, experiments were repeated at least three times and evaluated in triplicate.

Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA (1 μg) from control and CVB5-infected cells (4 dpi) were DNase treated (Promega) before cDNA synthesis using Superscript III (Invitrogen) and random hexamers. Resulting cDNA was diluted equally (1:10) before quantitative PCR, performed using SYBR FAST Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems) and gene-specific primers (5′-3′): BACH2 (GCCTCAATGACCAGCGGAAA; CAAACAGGCCATCCTCACTG), GAPDH (TCAAGATCATCAGCAATGCCTCC; ATCACGCCACAGTTTCCCG), β-ACTIN (CTGTACGCCAACACAGTGCT; GCTCAGGAGGAGCAATGATC), SH2B3 (AACCACCAGGTTCCTGCAAC; GGACAGCCAGAAGAACTAAGGTG), GLIS3 (CAACCAGATCAGTCCTAGCTTACA; GCGAAATAAGGGACCTGGTATC), CLEC16A (CATCAAGACGAGTGGGGAGAGT; TCCTCGTCCGTGGTGTTCTG), TLR7 (CCAGATATAGGATCACTCCATGCC; CAGTGTCCACATTGGAAACACC), and IKZF1 (CACAGTGAAATGGCAGAAGACC; GGCCCTTGTCCCCAAGAAAT).

The following cycle was repeated 40 times on the LightCycler 480II (Roche): 95°C 10 s, 60°C 20 s, and 72°C 15 s. Assays were performed in triplicate and confirmed at least three times. GAPDH and β-ACTIN levels were used to normalize Ct values. Relative mRNA expression for each gene was expressed as a fold difference to control expression, and significance was evaluated using Student t tests.

Bioinformatics Analyses

Only miRNAs with Ct values ≤35 and amplification scores ≥1.15 were considered for normalization. Global mean normalization (11) was applied to compare the geometric mean of all miRNA Ct values to individual miRNAs using ExpressionSuite v1.0.3 (Life Technologies). Fold differences between control and infected cells were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (12). When fold difference was <1, the negative reciprocal was taken to express a negative fold change. Only miRNAs with ≥ threefold difference were included for target prediction analysis using miRWalk (13). All identified miRNAs and type 1 diabetes risk genes compiled from T1DBase (14) were assessed by the miRWalk predictor tool using all 10 databases with the following settings: “human species,” “restricted to 3′UTR,” “2,000 upstream flanked,” “transcript = longest,” “minimum seed length = 7,” and “pValue = 0.05.” Genes predicted as targets by three or more databases were functionally annotated using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID), version 6.7 (15), which clustered them according to their associated gene ontology annotations and assigned each cluster an enrichment score (−log[P value]).

Statistical Analyses

The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare normalized Ct values of miRNAs in CVB5-infected versus control cells. Significance was set at an unadjusted P value <0.05 and miRNAs satisfying this were included for further analyses. For DAVID, biological processes with a false discovery rate of ≥0.05 computed by the Benjamini-Hochberg correction were deemed not statistically significant and discarded. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism (version 6; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) and SPSS (version 22; IBM, Armonk, NY).

After CVB5 infection, two miRNAs were significantly dysregulated (≥ threefold difference compared with mock-infected control) in human pancreatic islets at 1 dpi, with miR-155-5p increased fourfold and miR-181a-3p decreased threefold (Table 1). In contrast, 19 miRNAs were significantly decreased at 4 dpi (Fig. 1A). At 7 dpi, 12 miRNAs were decreased and 5 were increased (Fig. 1B). Overall, levels of 33 miRNAs were significantly altered during 7 days of infection, with 6 upregulated and 27 downregulated (Table 1). Greatest upward and downward fold changes were exhibited by miR-34a-5p and miR-625-5p, respectively. All differences measured between control and CVB5-infected islets were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Of the 33 CVB5-responsive miRNAs, 6 ranked among the top 100 most abundant miRNAs expressed in purified β-cells of healthy humans (7).

Table 1

Thirty-three miRNAs differentially expressed in CVB5-infected human islets compared with uninfected control

miRNADysregulation*Fold-changedpiRank of abundance in β-cells (x/518)§
625-5p Down 14.35  
365b-3p Down 9.24 4, 7 353 
34a-5p Up 8.22 115 
149-5p Down 7.71 334 
99b-3p Down 7.69 247 
182-5p Down 7.31 16 
21-3p Up 7.16 191 
93-3p Down 5.93 419 
216b-5p Down 5.07  
376c-3p Down 4.91 4, 7  
193b-3p Down 4.85 423 
432-5p Down 4.54 62 
339-3p Down 4.53 204 
181a-2-3p Down 4.41 330 
425-3p Down 4.30 174 
183-3p Down 4.17 4, 7 321 
155-5p Up 4.07 385 
1290 Up 4.01  
493-3p Down 3.88 273 
217 Down 3.83 167 
30a-3p Down 3.82 164 
30e-3p Down 3.48 4, 7 108 
345-5p Down 3.44 209 
720 Down 3.39 335 
885-5p Down 3.38 440 
29a-3p Down 3.35 57 
191-5p Down 3.28 
663b Up 3.27  
186-5p Down 3.22 40 
10b-3p Up 3.21  
411-5p Down 3.19 4, 7 43 
181a-3p Down 3.15  
629-3p Down 3.03  
miRNADysregulation*Fold-changedpiRank of abundance in β-cells (x/518)§
625-5p Down 14.35  
365b-3p Down 9.24 4, 7 353 
34a-5p Up 8.22 115 
149-5p Down 7.71 334 
99b-3p Down 7.69 247 
182-5p Down 7.31 16 
21-3p Up 7.16 191 
93-3p Down 5.93 419 
216b-5p Down 5.07  
376c-3p Down 4.91 4, 7  
193b-3p Down 4.85 423 
432-5p Down 4.54 62 
339-3p Down 4.53 204 
181a-2-3p Down 4.41 330 
425-3p Down 4.30 174 
183-3p Down 4.17 4, 7 321 
155-5p Up 4.07 385 
1290 Up 4.01  
493-3p Down 3.88 273 
217 Down 3.83 167 
30a-3p Down 3.82 164 
30e-3p Down 3.48 4, 7 108 
345-5p Down 3.44 209 
720 Down 3.39 335 
885-5p Down 3.38 440 
29a-3p Down 3.35 57 
191-5p Down 3.28 
663b Up 3.27  
186-5p Down 3.22 40 
10b-3p Up 3.21  
411-5p Down 3.19 4, 7 43 
181a-3p Down 3.15  
629-3p Down 3.03  

miRNAs are listed in the order of highest to lowest fold change.

*Direction of dysregulation.

†Fold difference in miRNA levels between CVB5-infected and uninfected human islets.

‡The dpi at which they were dysregulated.

§Rank (x/518) of abundance (number of reads/total number of reads) among 518 total miRNAs detected by Hi-Seq in healthy human pancreatic β-cells (7).

Figure 1

Dysregulation of miRNAs in CVB5-infected human pancreatic islets (at MOI = 1). A: Significant downregulation of 19 miRNAs at 4 dpi expressed as the negative fold difference compared with the mock-infected control. B: Significant dysregulation of 17 miRNAs at 7 dpi. Elevation of 5 miRNAs and the reduction of 12 miRNAs expressed as positive and negative fold difference compared with control, respectively. Each column represents results from six independent experiments, and the error bars correspond to the SEM.

Figure 1

Dysregulation of miRNAs in CVB5-infected human pancreatic islets (at MOI = 1). A: Significant downregulation of 19 miRNAs at 4 dpi expressed as the negative fold difference compared with the mock-infected control. B: Significant dysregulation of 17 miRNAs at 7 dpi. Elevation of 5 miRNAs and the reduction of 12 miRNAs expressed as positive and negative fold difference compared with control, respectively. Each column represents results from six independent experiments, and the error bars correspond to the SEM.

Close modal

To explore the functional significance of these dysregulations, miRWalk database was used for miRNA target prediction (13). Alignments were restricted to the 3′UTRs of all candidate type 1 diabetes risk genes reported at the time of investigation (14). Remarkably, 57 of the total 72 risk genes were predicted as targets (Table 2). More specifically, miRNAs dysregulated at 1, 4, and 7 dpi were associated with 8, 56, and 47 different target risk genes, respectively. Most miRNAs were predicted to target multiple genes, with many exhibiting significant overlap. BACH2 displayed the greatest overlap, with 21 miRNAs predicted to target its 3′UTR (Table 2).

Table 2

Fifty-seven candidate type 1 diabetes risk genes predicted by miRWalk as putative targets of the 33 CVB5-responsive miRNAs

Risk genesUpregulatedDownregulatedn
BACH2 10b-3p, 34a-5p, 663b, 1290 29a-3p, 149-5p, 182-5p, 183-3p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 339-3p, 345-5p, 376c-3p, 425-3p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p, 885-5p 21 
SH2B3 10b-3p, 34a-5p, 663b, 1290 30a-3p, 30e-3p, 93-3p, 149-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 345-5p, 411-5p, 432-5p, 629-3p 16 
CLEC16A 663b 149-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 339-3p, 345-5p, 365b-3p, 376c-3p, 411-5p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p 14 
GLIS3 663b, 1290 29a-3p, 93-3p, 149-5p, 155-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 376c-3p, 425-3p, 432-5p 13 
IKZF1 34a-5p, 1290 149-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 345-5p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p 13 
ZMIZ1 10b-3p, 34a-5p, 663b 29a-3p, 149-5p, 186-5p, 217, 345-5p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 885-5p 12 
TNFAIP3 34a-5p 29a-3p, 149-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 345-5p, 376c-3p, 432-5p, 425-3p, 625-5p, 720 11 
CUX2 34a-5p, 663b, 1290 29a-3p, 149-5p, 182-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 432-5p, 493-3p 10 
AFF3 34a-5p 30a-3p, 30e-3p, 186-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 376c-3p, 432-5p, 625-5p, 629-3p 10 
C1QTNF6 10b-3p, 663b 29a-3p, 191-5p, 193b-3p, 217, 365b-3p, 376c-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p 10 
SKAP2 1290 149-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 217, 411-5p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
ZFP36L1 10b-3p, 1290 29a-3p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p, 885-5p 
GAB3  93-3p, 149-5p, 155-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 365b-3p, 376c-3p, 629-3p 
PDE4A 10b-3p, 34a-5p 149-5p, 186-5p, 425-3p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
IL17D 663b 29a-3p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
LMO7  30a-3p, 30e-3p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 493-3p 
TLR7  182-5p, 186-5p, 345-5p, 425-3p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 629-3p 
SLC11A1 10b-3p 93-3p, 182-5p, 339-3p, 365b-3p, 625-5p, 720 
CCR5 21-3p 29a-3p, 149-5p, 345-5p, 432-5p, 629-3p 
ERBB3 34a-5p, 1290 149-5p, 182-5p, 217, 345-5p 
PTPN2 10b-3p 155-5p, 186-5p, 217, 345-5p, 411-5p 
IL2RB 34a-5p 149-5p, 345-5p, 625-5p, 629-3p 
GCA  183-3p, 186-5p, 376c-3p, 425-3p, 629-3p 
IL2RA  29a-3p, 186-5p, 191-5p, 345-5p, 629-3p 
PRKCQ 34a-5p, 1290 186-5p, 193b-3p, 411-5p 
PTPN22 34a-5p 155-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 629-3p 
CD226  155-5p, 182-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 411-5p 
FUT2  186-5p, 191-5p, 411-5p, 625-5p 
CD55  182-5p, 186-5p, 216b-5p, 629-3p 
RASGRP1 10b-3p 182-5p, 186-5p, 885-5p 
RGS1  29a-3p, 193b-3p, 345-5p, 425-3p 
CTLA4  155-5p, 376c-3p, 432-5p, 493-3p 
PGM1 34a-5p 182-5p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
COBL  182-5p, 625-5p, 629-3p, 885-5p 
ORMDL3 34a-5p, 663b 93-3p, 625-5p 
DEXI  149-5p, 216b-5p, 625-5p 
HLA-DQB1  186-5p, 411-5p, 625-5p 
C19orf10  30a-3p, 30e-3p, 376c-3p 
TAGAP 21-3p 155-5p, 365b-3p 
SIRPG  149-5p, 182-5p 
IL2  186-5p, 376c-3p 
IL21  186-5p, 376c-3p 
IL10  186-5p, 411-5p 
CYP27B1  186-5p, 625-5p 
SUMO4  186-5p, 625-5p 
CD69  182-5p, 186-5p 
GCG 663b 186-5p 
HORMAD2  155-5p, 216b-5p 
TLR8 10b-3p 376c-3p 
FAP  345-5p, 629-3p 
CTSH  186-5p 
IFIH1  186-5p 
STAT4  186-5p 
UMOD  193b-3p 
AIRE  629-3p 
IL7R  629-3p 
CEL 663b – 
Risk genesUpregulatedDownregulatedn
BACH2 10b-3p, 34a-5p, 663b, 1290 29a-3p, 149-5p, 182-5p, 183-3p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 339-3p, 345-5p, 376c-3p, 425-3p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p, 885-5p 21 
SH2B3 10b-3p, 34a-5p, 663b, 1290 30a-3p, 30e-3p, 93-3p, 149-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 345-5p, 411-5p, 432-5p, 629-3p 16 
CLEC16A 663b 149-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 339-3p, 345-5p, 365b-3p, 376c-3p, 411-5p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p 14 
GLIS3 663b, 1290 29a-3p, 93-3p, 149-5p, 155-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 376c-3p, 425-3p, 432-5p 13 
IKZF1 34a-5p, 1290 149-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 216b-5p, 217, 345-5p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p 13 
ZMIZ1 10b-3p, 34a-5p, 663b 29a-3p, 149-5p, 186-5p, 217, 345-5p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 885-5p 12 
TNFAIP3 34a-5p 29a-3p, 149-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 345-5p, 376c-3p, 432-5p, 425-3p, 625-5p, 720 11 
CUX2 34a-5p, 663b, 1290 29a-3p, 149-5p, 182-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 432-5p, 493-3p 10 
AFF3 34a-5p 30a-3p, 30e-3p, 186-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 376c-3p, 432-5p, 625-5p, 629-3p 10 
C1QTNF6 10b-3p, 663b 29a-3p, 191-5p, 193b-3p, 217, 365b-3p, 376c-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p 10 
SKAP2 1290 149-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 217, 411-5p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
ZFP36L1 10b-3p, 1290 29a-3p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 493-3p, 625-5p, 629-3p, 885-5p 
GAB3  93-3p, 149-5p, 155-5p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 365b-3p, 376c-3p, 629-3p 
PDE4A 10b-3p, 34a-5p 149-5p, 186-5p, 425-3p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
IL17D 663b 29a-3p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
LMO7  30a-3p, 30e-3p, 182-5p, 186-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 493-3p 
TLR7  182-5p, 186-5p, 345-5p, 425-3p, 432-5p, 493-3p, 629-3p 
SLC11A1 10b-3p 93-3p, 182-5p, 339-3p, 365b-3p, 625-5p, 720 
CCR5 21-3p 29a-3p, 149-5p, 345-5p, 432-5p, 629-3p 
ERBB3 34a-5p, 1290 149-5p, 182-5p, 217, 345-5p 
PTPN2 10b-3p 155-5p, 186-5p, 217, 345-5p, 411-5p 
IL2RB 34a-5p 149-5p, 345-5p, 625-5p, 629-3p 
GCA  183-3p, 186-5p, 376c-3p, 425-3p, 629-3p 
IL2RA  29a-3p, 186-5p, 191-5p, 345-5p, 629-3p 
PRKCQ 34a-5p, 1290 186-5p, 193b-3p, 411-5p 
PTPN22 34a-5p 155-5p, 186-5p, 193b-3p, 629-3p 
CD226  155-5p, 182-5p, 216b-5p, 217, 411-5p 
FUT2  186-5p, 191-5p, 411-5p, 625-5p 
CD55  182-5p, 186-5p, 216b-5p, 629-3p 
RASGRP1 10b-3p 182-5p, 186-5p, 885-5p 
RGS1  29a-3p, 193b-3p, 345-5p, 425-3p 
CTLA4  155-5p, 376c-3p, 432-5p, 493-3p 
PGM1 34a-5p 182-5p, 432-5p, 625-5p 
COBL  182-5p, 625-5p, 629-3p, 885-5p 
ORMDL3 34a-5p, 663b 93-3p, 625-5p 
DEXI  149-5p, 216b-5p, 625-5p 
HLA-DQB1  186-5p, 411-5p, 625-5p 
C19orf10  30a-3p, 30e-3p, 376c-3p 
TAGAP 21-3p 155-5p, 365b-3p 
SIRPG  149-5p, 182-5p 
IL2  186-5p, 376c-3p 
IL21  186-5p, 376c-3p 
IL10  186-5p, 411-5p 
CYP27B1  186-5p, 625-5p 
SUMO4  186-5p, 625-5p 
CD69  182-5p, 186-5p 
GCG 663b 186-5p 
HORMAD2  155-5p, 216b-5p 
TLR8 10b-3p 376c-3p 
FAP  345-5p, 629-3p 
CTSH  186-5p 
IFIH1  186-5p 
STAT4  186-5p 
UMOD  193b-3p 
AIRE  629-3p 
IL7R  629-3p 
CEL 663b – 

Genes are listed in the order of highest to lowest number of miRNAs predicted to target their 3′UTR (n). The associated miRNAs are shown for each gene, categorized separately into those that were upregulated and downregulated.

Biological processes of the 57 putative targets were investigated using DAVID (15), which grouped them according to their respective gene ontology annotation and provided an enrichment score for each cluster (Fig. 2A). No statistically significant biological processes were identified from the predicted targets of miRNAs dysregulated at 1 dpi. In contrast, 67 common processes were identified from the predicted targets of miRNAs differentially expressed at 4 and 7 dpi. The process with the highest enrichment score was “positive regulation of immune processes.”

Figure 2

Biological processes of type 1 diabetes risk genes predicted as miRNA targets and their mRNA expression levels in CVB5-infected human islets. A: Biological processes are clustered according to their DAVID gene ontology annotation. Each cluster is plotted against their respective enrichment score (−log[P value]). Clusters generated from putative target genes of miRNAs dysregulated at 4 and 7 dpi are represented in gray and black, respectively. B: Relative mRNA expression of human BACH2, GLIS3, CLEC16A, SH2B3, IKZF1, TLR7, and IFIH1 as measured by quantitative PCR, normalized to GAPDH and β-ACTIN. Bars represent fold difference compared with uninfected control at 4 dpi. Mean ± SD of triplicate measurements. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Figure 2

Biological processes of type 1 diabetes risk genes predicted as miRNA targets and their mRNA expression levels in CVB5-infected human islets. A: Biological processes are clustered according to their DAVID gene ontology annotation. Each cluster is plotted against their respective enrichment score (−log[P value]). Clusters generated from putative target genes of miRNAs dysregulated at 4 and 7 dpi are represented in gray and black, respectively. B: Relative mRNA expression of human BACH2, GLIS3, CLEC16A, SH2B3, IKZF1, TLR7, and IFIH1 as measured by quantitative PCR, normalized to GAPDH and β-ACTIN. Bars represent fold difference compared with uninfected control at 4 dpi. Mean ± SD of triplicate measurements. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Close modal

CVB5 infection can induce upregulation of many immune response genes in human islets, including pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (16). Indeed, mRNA levels of IFIH1 and TLR7 were significantly elevated in the CVB5-infected cells compared with controls at 4 dpi (Fig. 2B). Examination of other type 1 diabetes risk genes revealed similar increases in the mRNAs of SH2B3 and IKZF1, whereas levels of BACH2, GLIS3, and CLEC16A remained unchanged.

Our examination of CVB5-infected human islets revealed significant dysregulation of 33 miRNAs during 7 days of infection (Table 1). This represents 2.2% of all characterized human miRNAs (5) and 6.4% of miRNAs expressed in healthy human pancreatic β-cells (7). Since a single miRNA can potentially regulate hundreds of genes (4), disruption of even a small subset of miRNAs can profoundly impact the transcriptome and biology of cells.

Both miR-155-5p and -181a-3p are important modulators of the immune response, directing suppression of proinflammatory cytokines and NF-kB pathway activators (17,18). In this study, miR-155-5p was elevated in CVB5-infected cells and predicted to target the antiapoptotic gene GLIS3. Loss of GLIS3 sensitizes cells to cytokine-mediated apoptosis (19). Therefore, increased miR-155-5p may reduce GLIS3 expression and promote β-cell apoptosis, whereas the concurrent reduction of miR-181a-3p is expected to produce the opposite effect. Although it seems contradictory that two miRNAs negate each other’s effects, apoptosis is highly disadvantageous for the virus, and therefore CVB5 may directly decrease miR-181a-3p to nullify the host’s promotion of apoptosis via miR-155-5p.

Among miRNAs dysregulated at later time points, miR-10b-3p, -182-5p, -186-5p, -345-5p, -376c-3p, -425-3p, -432-5p, -493-3p, and -629-3p were predicted to target multiple PRRs: IFIH1, TLR7, and TLR8 (Table 2). These encode proteins that promote generation of type 1 interferons and proinflammatory cytokines (20). They also activate downstream caspases that trigger apoptosis (21). All PRR-targeting miRNAs were downregulated in response to CVB5 infection, except miR-10b-3p. Therefore, the likely outcomes are the overexpression of PRRs and enhanced immune response against CVB5. Although this seems beneficial for viral defense, such elevation could induce exacerbated inflammation and prolonged apoptosis of β-cells, promoting type 1 diabetes development.

BACH2 is an important regulator of cytokine-induced apoptosis in pancreatic β-cells (22). In rodent and human pancreatic islets, BACH2 inhibition exacerbates cytokine-induced β-cell destruction. Conversely, its overexpression has protective effects. Therefore, it is plausible that the reduction of miRNAs targeting BACH2 at 4 and 7 dpi results in BACH2 overexpression, protecting CVB5-infected cells from apoptosis. This could be a strategy imposed by CVB5 to promote its propagation. If so, the increase of several BACH2-targeting miRNAs observed at 7 dpi (Table 2) might reflect the host’s efforts to counter CVB5 and restore normal apoptosis of infected β-cells.

Interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-10, IL-17D, and IL-21 were among the predicted targets of miRNAs downregulated in CVB5-infected cells. Reduced miRNA-directed suppression of these cytokines will likely enhance inflammation and β-cell death, potentiating islet autoimmunity. Consistent with this hypothesis, we previously identified significant correlations between increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines (including IL-2, IL-17, and IL-21) and islet autoimmunity in children (23). Furthermore, expression of many type 1 diabetes risk genes are modified by cytokine exposure in human pancreatic islets, including PTPN2, IFIH1, SH2B3, STAT-4, GLIS-3, CD55, RASGRP1, and SKAP2 (24), which are all predicted targets of CVB5-dysregulated miRNAs identified in this study.

The greatest fold increase was exhibited by miR-34a-5p (eightfold) (Table 1). Previously, its expression increased three- to fourfold after exposure to palmitate and proinflammatory cytokines in rodent and human pancreatic islets (6,25). Moreover, similar elevation of miR-34a was present in β-cells of db/db and NOD mice during development of prediabetic insulitis (6,25). Two targets of miR-34a-5p have been verified:

  1. VAMP2, essential for β-cell exocytosis, and

  2. antiapoptotic BclII.

Accordingly, miR-34a-5p overexpression reduces both targets in MIN6 cells, diminishing maximum insulin secretion capacity and increasing apoptosis (25). Thus, the sharp increase of miR-34a-5p in CVB5-infected islets may enhance secretory dysfunction and destruction of β-cells, which are hallmarks of type 1 diabetes.

When interpreting fold changes in miRNA expression between test and control samples, it is crucial to consider the natural miRNA abundance. For example, miR-625-5p exhibited the greatest fold change between control and CVB5-infected cells. However, the 14-fold reduction of this miRNA is unlikely to impact β-cell function, as its normal expression in pancreatic β-cells is already very low (Table 1) (7). This also applies to miR-216b-5p, -376c-3p, -181a-3p, and -629-3p. In contrast, sudden increases of low-abundant miRNAs can lead to new miRNA-target interactions and regulatory cascades, which could be the case for miR-34a-5p, -21-3p, -155-5p, -1290, -663b, and -10b-3p.

Six miRNA-target interactions identified in this study (BACH2-miR-29a-3p, BACH2-miR-34a-5p, SH2B3-miR-193b-3p, TNFAIP3-miR-29a-3p, ZFP36L1-29a-3p, and RGS1-miR-29a-3p) have been validated in pancreatic β-cells of healthy adults (7). However, others require future experimental verification. To fully evaluate the significance of our findings, it is important to determine whether the dysregulation of 33 miRNAs in CVB5-infected human islets produces concomitant changes in protein abundances of predicted targets. One high-throughput approach would be to compare global peptide profiles of CVB5-infected and uninfected human pancreatic islet cells using proteomics. In this study, we measured the mRNA levels of seven predicted targets and found significant elevations for IFIH1, TLR7, SH2B3, and IKZF1 in CVB5-infected islets (Fig. 2B). This is consistent with the decreased levels of miRNAs targeting these genes, which could subsequently reduce the destabilization of their mRNAs. In contrast, genes that exhibited no change at the mRNA level may only be affected at the protein level.

In summary, our study represents the first global miRNA expression profiling of CVB5-infected human pancreatic islets. Collectively, the 33 dysregulated miRNAs identified were predicted to target mRNAs of 57 candidate type 1 diabetes risk genes. Given that the majority of these miRNAs were significantly downregulated, and their targets function as key regulators of the proinflammatory response, it is plausible that the disrupted activities of these miRNAs induced by CVB5 may exacerbate the antiviral immune response in genetically susceptible individuals, initiating a pathway that leads to the destruction of β-cells and eventually type 1 diabetes.

K.W.K. and A.H. are equal first authors.

See accompanying article, p. 823.

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. K.W.K. researched data and wrote the manuscript. A.H. and A.A.H. researched data and contributed to discussion. A.A.-A. researched data. T.W.H.K. provided the human pancreatic islets used in this study. W.D.R. and M.E.C. researched data, contributed to discussion, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.E.C. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Yeung
WC
,
Rawlinson
WD
,
Craig
ME
.
Enterovirus infection and type 1 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational molecular studies
.
BMJ
2011
;
342
:
d35
[PubMed]
2.
Galleri L, Sebastiani G, Vendrame F, Grieco F, Spagnuolo I, Dotta F. Viral infections and diabetes. In Diabetes. Ahmad S, Ed. New York, Springer, 2013, p. 252–271
3.
Fernandez-Valverde
SL
,
Taft
RJ
,
Mattick
JS
.
MicroRNAs in β-cell biology, insulin resistance, diabetes and its complications
.
Diabetes
2011
;
60
:
1825
1831
[PubMed]
4.
Fabian
MR
,
Sonenberg
N
,
Filipowicz
W
.
Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs
.
Annu Rev Biochem
2010
;
79
:
351
379
[PubMed]
5.
Nielsen LB, Wang C, Sorensen K, et al. Circulating levels of microRNA from children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and healthy controls: evidence that miR-25 associates to residual beta-cell function and glycaemic control during disease progression. Exp Diabetes Res 2012;2012:896362
6.
Lovis
P
,
Roggli
E
,
Laybutt
DR
, et al
.
Alterations in microRNA expression contribute to fatty acid-induced pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction
.
Diabetes
2008
;
57
:
2728
2736
[PubMed]
7.
Kameswaran
V
,
Bramswig
NC
,
McKenna
LB
, et al
.
Epigenetic regulation of the DLK1-MEG3 microRNA cluster in human type 2 diabetic islets
.
Cell Metab
2014
;
19
:
135
145
[PubMed]
8.
Lam
WY
,
Cheung
AC
,
Tung
CK
, et al
.
miR-466 is putative negative regulator of Coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor
.
FEBS Lett
2015
;
589
:
246
254
[PubMed]
9.
Nair
S
,
Leung
KC
,
Rawlinson
WD
,
Naing
Z
,
Craig
ME
.
Enterovirus infection induces cytokine and chemokine expression in insulin-producing cells
.
J Med Virol
2010
;
82
:
1950
1957
[PubMed]
10.
Wong
W
,
Farr
R
,
Joglekar
M
,
Januszewski
A
,
Hardikar
A
.
Probe-based Real-time PCR approaches for quantitative measurement of microRNAs
.
J Vis Exp
2015
;
98
[PubMed]
11.
Mestdagh
P
,
Van Vlierberghe
P
,
De Weer
A
, et al
.
A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization
.
Genome Biol
2009
;
10
:
R64
[PubMed]
12.
Schmittgen
TD
,
Livak
KJ
.
Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method
.
Nat Protoc
2008
;
3
:
1101
1108
[PubMed]
13.
Dweep
H
,
Gretz
N
,
Sticht
C
.
miRWalk database for miRNA-target interactions
.
Methods Mol Biol
2014
;
1182
:
289
305
[PubMed]
14.
Burren
OS
,
Adlem
EC
,
Achuthan
P
,
Christensen
M
,
Coulson
RM
,
Todd
JA
.
T1DBase: update 2011, organization and presentation of large-scale data sets for type 1 diabetes research
.
Nucleic Acids Res
2011
;
39
:
D997
D1001
[PubMed]
15.
Huang
W
,
Sherman
BT
,
Lempicki
RA
.
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
.
Nat Protoc
2009
;
4
:
44
57
[PubMed]
16.
Ylipaasto
P
,
Smura
T
,
Gopalacharyulu
P
, et al
.
Enterovirus-induced gene expression profile is critical for human pancreatic islet destruction
.
Diabetologia
2012
;
55
:
3273
3283
[PubMed]
17.
Lu
F
,
Weidmer
A
,
Liu
CG
,
Volinia
S
,
Croce
CM
,
Lieberman
PM
.
Epstein-Barr virus-induced miR-155 attenuates NF-kappaB signaling and stabilizes latent virus persistence
.
J Virol
2008
;
82
:
10436
10443
[PubMed]
18.
Li
H
,
Chen
X
,
Guan
L
, et al
.
MiRNA-181a regulates adipogenesis by targeting tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the porcine model
.
PLoS One
2013
;
8
:
e71568
[PubMed]
19.
Nogueira
TC
,
Paula
FM
,
Villate
O
, et al
.
GLIS3, a susceptibility gene for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, modulates pancreatic beta cell apoptosis via regulation of a splice variant of the BH3-only protein Bim
.
PLoS Genet
2013
;
9
:
e1003532
[PubMed]
20.
Lien
E
,
Zipris
D
.
The role of Toll-like receptor pathways in the mechanism of type 1 diabetes
.
Curr Mol Med
2009
;
9
:
52
68
[PubMed]
21.
McKenzie
MD
,
Carrington
EM
,
Kaufmann
T
, et al
.
Proapoptotic BH3-only protein Bid is essential for death receptor-induced apoptosis of pancreatic beta-cells
.
Diabetes
2008
;
57
:
1284
1292
[PubMed]
22.
Marroquí
L
,
Santin
I
,
Dos Santos
RS
,
Marselli
L
,
Marchetti
P
,
Eizirik
DL
.
BACH2, a candidate risk gene for type 1 diabetes, regulates apoptosis in pancreatic β-cells via JNK1 modulation and crosstalk with the candidate gene PTPN2
.
Diabetes
2014
;
63
:
2516
2527
[PubMed]
23.
Yeung
WC
,
Al-Shabeeb
A
,
Pang
CN
, et al
.
Children with islet autoimmunity and enterovirus infection demonstrate a distinct cytokine profile
.
Diabetes
2012
;
61
:
1500
1508
[PubMed]
24.
Eizirik
DL
,
Sammeth
M
,
Bouckenooghe
T
, et al
.
The human pancreatic islet transcriptome: expression of candidate genes for type 1 diabetes and the impact of pro-inflammatory cytokines
.
PLoS Genet
2012
;
8
:
e1002552
[PubMed]
25.
Roggli
E
,
Britan
A
,
Gattesco
S
, et al
.
Involvement of microRNAs in the cytotoxic effects exerted by proinflammatory cytokines on pancreatic beta-cells
.
Diabetes
2010
;
59
:
978
986
[PubMed]