Signaling via the receptor of advanced glycation end products (RAGE)—though complex and not fully elucidated in the setting of diabetes—is considered a key injurious pathway in the development of diabetic nephropathy (DN). We report here that RAGE deletion resulted in increased expression of fibrotic markers (collagen I and IV, fibronectin) and the inflammatory marker MCP-1 in primary mouse mesangial cells (MCs) and in kidney cortex. RNA sequencing analysis in MCs from RAGE−/− and wild-type mice confirmed these observations. Nevertheless, despite these gene expression changes, decreased responsiveness to transforming growth factor-β was identified in RAGE−/− mice. Furthermore, RAGE deletion conferred a more proliferative phenotype in MCs and reduced susceptibility to staurosporine-induced apoptosis. RAGE restoration experiments in RAGE−/− MCs largely reversed these gene expression changes, resulting in reduced expression of fibrotic and inflammatory markers. This study highlights that protection against DN in RAGE knockout mice is likely to be due in part to the decreased responsiveness to growth factor stimulation and an antiapoptotic phenotype in MCs. Furthermore, it extends our understanding of the role of RAGE in the progression of DN, as RAGE seems to play a key role in modulating the sensitivity of the kidney to injurious stimuli such as prosclerotic cytokines.

The receptor of advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cell surface multiligand receptor (1,2) and a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily; it plays a role in tissue repair early in disease (3) but also has been linked to chronic proinflammatory gene activation in the pathogenesis of several diseases including Alzheimer disease, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, and diabetes complications (4). In the kidney, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) binding to RAGE results in increased expression of growth factors and cytokines such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, connective tissue growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and MCP-1, ultimately leading to glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury (5).

Transgenic overexpression of RAGE worsens kidney disease in both nondiabetic and diabetic mice (6), whereas administration of soluble RAGE (7) or RAGE-neutralizing antibodies (8) confers protection against complications, similar to that observed in RAGE−/− mice (7,912). Specifically targeting RAGE as a therapeutic treatment remains controversial because RAGE plays a key role in both innate and adaptive immune responses (4,13,14), lung homeostasis, bone metabolism, the immune system, and the nervous system (15). A better understanding of the role of RAGE in physiological processes—particularly in the kidney—is required because RAGE-directed therapeutic strategies are being considered for diabetic nephropathy (DN).

This study revealed an important homeostatic role for RAGE in the normal kidney and particularly in mesangial cells (MCs). RAGE deletion resulted in increased macrophage infiltration in the diabetic kidney, despite improved renal function, and decreased mesangial expansion. Gene profiling experiments demonstrated that RAGE−/− MCs were less responsive to the actions of TGF-β, resulting in the downregulation of several signaling pathways, despite increases in the baseline expression of fibrotic and inflammatory markers. Restoring RAGE expression in RAGE−/− MCs by adenoviral delivery returned the expression of fibrotic, inflammatory, and cell survival genes to control levels. These observations contribute to our understanding of the renoprotection conferred by RAGE deletion in response to diabetes.

Cell Culture

MCs were isolated from the kidneys of C57BL6/J mice (16) and RAGE−/− mice on a C57BL6/J background (17) through glomeruli collected after sieving (106-, 180-, and 75-µm pore size, respectively) and culturing MC outgrowths in DMEM (20% FCS), as previously described for rats (9,18). MCs were identified as positive for desmin, Thy-1.1, and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) expression; as negative for von Willebrand factor; and by morphological evaluation (19). MCs were cultured up to 10 passages in DMEM (20% FCS). For experiments, cells were seeded at 8 × 104 cells/well in six-well plates. Fresh DMEM (2% FCS) was added after 24 h, with or without TGF-β1 (R&D systems), in normal glucose (5.5 mmol/L) or high glucose (HG; 25 mmol/L), and cells were incubated another 3 days. Unless otherwise specified, in vitro studies were conducted in HG medium.

Cell Proliferation, Viability, and Apoptosis

To study proliferation, MCs were seeded at 2.5 × 104 cells/well and the medium was replaced with DMEM (5% FCS) after 24 h. Cells were counted with a Tali Image-Based Cytometer (Life Technologies). To determine viability, cells were seeded at 10 × 104 cells/well, and the next day cells were starved in DMEM (no FCS) for 24 h. Cell death was assessed using the Tali Viability Kit (1:100; Life Technologies). To study apoptosis, cells were seeded at 10 × 104 cells/well on collagen I–coated cover slips. The next day cells were treated with staurosporine (12.5 nmol/L; Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h to induce apoptosis before immunostaining for active caspase-3 (1:500; Neuromics).

Western Blotting

Primary antibodies were collagen I (1:5,000; Abcam), α-SMA (1:2,000; Dako), phospho-smad3 (1:1,000; Invitrogen), smad3 (1:5,000; OriGene), phospho–extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) (1:500; Cell Signaling), ERK (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology), S100A4 (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology), P53 (1:500; Abcam) and β-actin (1:10,000; Abcam). Secondary antibodies were goat antimouse antibody (1:20,000; Dako) or goat antirabbit horseradish peroxidase–conjugated antibody (1:10,000; Dako).

Adenovirus-Mediated RAGE Gene Transfer In Vitro

Human full-length (FL) RAGE (FL-RAGE) and endogenous secretory RAGE (ES-RAGE) cDNA (gifts from Prof. H. Yamamoto [20]) were subcloned into AdEasy-1 (Ad-FL-RAGE and Ad-ES-RAGE) (9). pAdTrack-CMV without RAGE was used as an empty vector control. Virus was packed using HEK293 cells. MCs were seeded at 6 × 104 cells/well and grown to 60% confluence in DMEM (10% FCS). The medium was then replaced with DMEM (2% FCS) containing Ad-FL-RAGE, Ad-ES-RAGE vector, or empty vector (2.85 × 108 optical particle units). After 3 days cells were harvested to analyze gene expression. Transfection efficiency was 80–90% on the basis of green fluorescent protein fluorescence.

Transfection of Small Interfering RNA

Cells were seeded at 6 × 104 cells/well in 12-well plates in DMEM (10% FCS) without antibiotics. Medium was replaced with DMEM (2% FCS) and cells were transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA)—5 nmol/L for RAGE or 10 nmol/L for S100A4—using RNAiMAX (Invitrogen); siRNA-negative controls were used at the same concentrations. Cells were harvested 24 h after transfection. RAGE siRNA was transfected on two consecutive days, and cells were harvested 48 h after the first transfection.

RNA Extraction and Real-time PCR

Total RNA (2 μg) extracted from the left kidney cortex or MCs was used to synthesize cDNA, as previously described (21). Gene expression was analyzed by real-time PCR using a TaqMan system (ABI Prism 7500; PerkinElmer) and normalized to 18S rRNA (18S rRNA TaqMan Control Reagent kit; PerkinElmer). Results were expressed relative to control (untreated) cells, which were arbitrarily assigned a value of 1, with four to six replicates per group.

RNA Sequencing Library Preparation and Sequencing

RNA was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer and integrity was assayed using a MultiNA Bioanalyzer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). An NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module was used to enrich mRNA from 1 μg of total RNA. Following elution of mRNA, we used the NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina) to generate barcoded libraries. Libraries were validated with the MultiNA Bioanalyzer (Shimadzu), pooled to equimolar ratios, and sequenced at the Australian Genome Research Facility (Melbourne) using an Illumina HiSeq2500 system with version 4 single-end flow cell and reagents for 60 cycles.

Bioinformatics Analysis

Single-end mRNA sequencing reads underwent quality trimming to remove low-quality bases from the 3′ end of reads using the FASTX-Toolkit (version 0.0.14), applying a Phred quality threshold of 20 and minimum 20-nucleotide read length. STAR version 3.2.0.1 (22), with the default settings, was used to align reads to the mouse genome (Mus_musculus.GRCm38.dna.toplevel.fa; downloaded from Ensembl, www.ensembl.org/info/data/ftp/). We used Ensembl version 77 gene annotations (Mus_musculus.GRCm38.77.gtf). Exon-mapped reads were counted using featureCounts version 1.4.2 (23), with a mapping quality threshold of 10. Genes with fewer than 10 reads per sample on average were excluded from downstream analysis. Multidimensional scaling was analyzed using the cmdscale function in R software. Differential gene expression was statistically analyzed using edgeR software version 0.20 with the default settings (24). Factorial edgeR analysis was performed to identify genes and pathways whose differential regulation in response to TGF-β treatment is dependent on the presence of RAGE. To facilitate pathway analysis, mouse gene identifiers were mapped to human gene names using a mouse-human homolog relationship table downloaded from Ensembl BioMart (www.ensembl.org/biomart). Pathways were analyzed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)-P software version 2.2.1.0 using the unweighted “classic” scoring scheme (25). Gene sets for pathway analysis were downloaded from MSigDB (software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb). Heatmaps were generated in base R.

In Vivo Experiments

Male mice were injected with streptozotocin (55 mg/kg i.p. daily for five consecutive days; diabetes group) (26) or sodium citrate buffer (control group). Plasma glucose levels (Accutrend; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemica, Mannheim, Germany) were determined after 10 days, and mice were overtly diabetic (plasma glucose >15 mmol/L; >95% of mice). The diet (AIN-93G; Specialty Feeds, Glen Forrest, Perth, Australia) and water were provided ad libitum. Mice (n = 8/group) were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions with exposure to a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle for 24 weeks. All animal studies were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Alfred Medical Research & Education Precinct Animal Ethics Committee and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. At the end of the study, kidneys and plasma were collected for analysis, and glycated hemoglobin was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (27). Albumin excretion rate (AER) was determined by ELISA (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX) (28), and creatinine in urine and plasma was determined by HPLC (Agilent HP1100 system; Hewlett Packard, Böblingen, Germany), as recommended previously (29). The glomerular sclerotic index (GSI) was assessed using a semiquantitative method and point-counting technique (30). Tubulointerstitial area (TIA) was assessed using a point-counting technique (31).

Immunohistochemistry

Sections (4 μm thick) were stained for collagen IV (1:600, rabbit polyclonal; Abcam). Briefly, sections were dewaxed, hydrated, and quenched with 3% H2O2 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and digested with 0.4% pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.01 mol/L HCl at 37°C. Sections were blocked with 0.5% milk/TBS and incubated with the primary antibody at 4°C for 24 h. After avidin/biotin blocking, biotinylated antirabbit IgG (1:500) was applied as the secondary antibody at room temperature (RT) for 10 min.

For CD68 and CD169 immunostaining, frozen sections (5 μmol/L) were air-dried and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde-lysine-periodate for 10 min. Sections were stained for CD68+ (1:500; BD Biosciences) leukocytes overnight at 4°C and for CD169 (1:200; Serotec) leukocytes at RT for 90 min. After washing, sections were incubated in 0.6% H2O2/TBS at RT for 20 min, followed by avidin/biotin blocking. Sections were incubated with biotinylated rabbit antirat IgG (1:200) at RT for 1 h. Finally, horseradish peroxidase–conjugated streptavidin (VECTASTAIN Elite ABC staining kit; Vector Laboratories) was added and sections incubated at RT for 30 min. Peroxidase conjugates were visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.08% H2O2/TBS.

Sections were finally counterstained with Mayer hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. Sections were examined under a light microscope (Olympus BX-50; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) and digitized with a high-resolution camera. Collagen IV–positive staining in the cortex (20 cross sections per animal; magnification ×200) was quantitated using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD) (32). CD68+ and CD169+ leukocytes were counted in the glomerulus (15 hilar glomerular tuft cross sections per animal; magnification ×400). All assessments were performed in a blinded manner. Five or six kidneys were investigated in each group.

MCP-1, TGF-β1, and Fibronectin ELISA

Renal cortex (50 mg) was homogenized (Polytron PT-MR2100) in extraction buffer to isolate cytosol and membranous fractions, as previously described (33). Total protein was determined by the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce Chemical Company). MCP-1 levels in renal cortical cytosolic fractions were determined by sandwich ELISA (R&D Systems). Renal cytosolic fractions were concentrated using Microcon filters (Ultracel YM membrane, 10 kDa cut-off; Millipore Corporation). TGF-β1 ELISA was run on acid-treated cortical cytosolic fractions to measure total TGF-β1 protein levels (TGF-β1 Emax ImmunoAssay kit; Promega Corporation). Fibronectin was measured in renal cortical fractions by ELISA (Mouse Fibronectin PicoKine ELISA Kit; Boster Biological Technology).

Mesangial Expansion, Glomerulosclerosis, and Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis

Kidney sections were stained with periodic acid Schiff (PAS) to quantitate glomerulosclerosis. The degree of glomerulosclerosis, which was defined as thickening of the glomerular basement membrane and mesangial expansion, was evaluated with a semiquantitative method, as described previously (30, 32). Following Masson trichrome staining, tubulointerstitial collagen deposition was assessed in 20 fields (×40 magnification) using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics), as previously described (11). TIA was evaluated in PAS-stained sections by point-counting, as previously described (30). Mesangial area was analyzed (as a percentage of glomerular area) from digital images of glomeruli (15–20 glomeruli per kidney per animal) using Image-Pro Plus, as described previously (11).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Values for experimental groups are shown as means, with bars indicating the SEM (Tables 1 and 3), unless otherwise stated. One-way ANOVA with Tukey posttest analysis or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest analysis were used to determine statistical significance. Where appropriate, we performed a two-tailed t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Differential gene expression was determined by mRNA sequencing with edgeR (24), and differential pathway regulation was determined with GSEA-P (25). The Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to correct for the false discovery rate (FDR) in results from edgeR and GSEA-P (34). FDR-adjusted P values ≤0.05 were considered significant.

Table 1

Baseline expression of selected profibrotic, proinflammatory, and cell survival genes assessed by RT-PCR in RAGE−/− compared with WT MCs

GeneFold increaseP value
S100A4 22.31 1.604E−12 
CCL2 (MCP-15.51 1.526E−11 
SNAI1 4.11 0.0000018 
SERPINE1 (PAI-13.29 0.0003641 
ACTA2SMA2.58 0.0000019 
COL1A1 2.50 0.0000695 
C3AR1 2.40 0.0033401 
VEGFA 2.13 0.0000070 
SNAI2 1.93 0.0028946 
BCL2 1.88 0.0127090 
TGFBR1 1.85 0.0013021 
MKi67 1.79 0.0028631 
TIMP2 1.59 0.0042756 
TWIST1 1.47 0.0005124 
ZEB2 1.47 0.0415466 
SMAD7 1.44 0.0055529 
VIM 1.43 0.0093040 
MMP2 1.37 0.0061688 
COL3A1 1.34 0.0077910 
TLR4 1.34 0.0051318 
PRKCB 0.69 0.0119001 
DIAPH1 0.63 0.0066800 
PRKCA 0.49 0.0000253 
COL4A1 0.49 0.0001433 
COL4A3 0.27 0.0019667 
GeneFold increaseP value
S100A4 22.31 1.604E−12 
CCL2 (MCP-15.51 1.526E−11 
SNAI1 4.11 0.0000018 
SERPINE1 (PAI-13.29 0.0003641 
ACTA2SMA2.58 0.0000019 
COL1A1 2.50 0.0000695 
C3AR1 2.40 0.0033401 
VEGFA 2.13 0.0000070 
SNAI2 1.93 0.0028946 
BCL2 1.88 0.0127090 
TGFBR1 1.85 0.0013021 
MKi67 1.79 0.0028631 
TIMP2 1.59 0.0042756 
TWIST1 1.47 0.0005124 
ZEB2 1.47 0.0415466 
SMAD7 1.44 0.0055529 
VIM 1.43 0.0093040 
MMP2 1.37 0.0061688 
COL3A1 1.34 0.0077910 
TLR4 1.34 0.0051318 
PRKCB 0.69 0.0119001 
DIAPH1 0.63 0.0066800 
PRKCA 0.49 0.0000253 
COL4A1 0.49 0.0001433 
COL4A3 0.27 0.0019667 
Table 2

Expression of selected profibrotic and proinflammatory genes assessed by RT-PCR in RAGE−/− and WT MCs under low- or high-glucose conditions, with or without TGF-β1 treatment

GeneWT MCs
RAGE knockout MCs
LG
HG
LG
HG
ControlTGF-β1ControlTGF-β1ControlTGF-β1ControlTGF-β1
Col1α1 1 ± 0.09 3.03 ± 1.17* 1.1 ± 0.19 3.5 ± 0.21* 1.49 ± 0.07 3.33 ± 0.44* 2.74 ± 0.5 5.08 ± 0.94* 
αSMA 1 ± 0.3 2.21 ± 0.49* 0.91 ± 0.17 2.81 ± 0.68* 1.78 ± 0.43 1.9 ± 0.46 2.36 ± 0.32 2.33 ± 0.48 
MCP-1 1 ± 0.09 0.41 ± 0.09* 1 ± 0.3 0.46 ± 0.3* 4 ± 0.61 2.3 ± 0.42* 6.2 ± 2.9 2 ± 0.75* 
S100A4 1 ± 0.13 0.44 ± 0.13* 1.2 ± 0.28 0.6 ± 0.1* 22 ± 0.99 11 ± 3* 26 ± 3.9 20 ± 2.6* 
TGFBR1 1 ± 0.33 0.73 ± 0.17 0.78 ± 0.22 0.84 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.25 0.84 ± 0.16* 1.4 ± 0.3 1 ± 0.24 
PAI-1 1 ± 0.17 33 ± 14* 1.5 ± 0.47 42 ± 6.3* 2.4 ± 0.21 11 ± 1.1 4.9 ± 1.3 10 ± 1.8 
Fibronectin 1 ± 0.22 4.1 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 0.17 4.1 ± 0.79* 0.81 ± 0.13 2.4 ± 0.26* 1 ± 0.21 2.4 ± 0.43* 
ColIVa3 1.1 ± 0.43 2.5 ± 0.82* 1 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 1.1* 0.29 ± 0.11 0.59 ± 0.36 0.51 ± 0.3 0.91 ± 0.43 
GeneWT MCs
RAGE knockout MCs
LG
HG
LG
HG
ControlTGF-β1ControlTGF-β1ControlTGF-β1ControlTGF-β1
Col1α1 1 ± 0.09 3.03 ± 1.17* 1.1 ± 0.19 3.5 ± 0.21* 1.49 ± 0.07 3.33 ± 0.44* 2.74 ± 0.5 5.08 ± 0.94* 
αSMA 1 ± 0.3 2.21 ± 0.49* 0.91 ± 0.17 2.81 ± 0.68* 1.78 ± 0.43 1.9 ± 0.46 2.36 ± 0.32 2.33 ± 0.48 
MCP-1 1 ± 0.09 0.41 ± 0.09* 1 ± 0.3 0.46 ± 0.3* 4 ± 0.61 2.3 ± 0.42* 6.2 ± 2.9 2 ± 0.75* 
S100A4 1 ± 0.13 0.44 ± 0.13* 1.2 ± 0.28 0.6 ± 0.1* 22 ± 0.99 11 ± 3* 26 ± 3.9 20 ± 2.6* 
TGFBR1 1 ± 0.33 0.73 ± 0.17 0.78 ± 0.22 0.84 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.25 0.84 ± 0.16* 1.4 ± 0.3 1 ± 0.24 
PAI-1 1 ± 0.17 33 ± 14* 1.5 ± 0.47 42 ± 6.3* 2.4 ± 0.21 11 ± 1.1 4.9 ± 1.3 10 ± 1.8 
Fibronectin 1 ± 0.22 4.1 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 0.17 4.1 ± 0.79* 0.81 ± 0.13 2.4 ± 0.26* 1 ± 0.21 2.4 ± 0.43* 
ColIVa3 1.1 ± 0.43 2.5 ± 0.82* 1 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 1.1* 0.29 ± 0.11 0.59 ± 0.36 0.51 ± 0.3 0.91 ± 0.43 

Data are mean ± SE. All comparisons are relative to the WT control under low-glucose (LG) conditions for each gene.

*P < 0.05 vs. control for each group (n = 6–10 mice/group).

Table 3

Expression of certain profibrotic and proinflammatory genes assessed by RT-PCR in RAGE−/− and WT MCs with adenoviral delivery of FL-RAGE or ES-RAGE

Gene, by MC typeEVFL-RAGEES-RAGE
RAGE−/−    
 Col I 1 ± 0.15 0.76 ± 0.15* 0.68 ± 0.09* 
 αSMA 1 ± 0.12 0.61 ± 0.07* 0.78 ± 0.1* 
 MCP-1 1 ± 0.09 0.43 ± 0.09* 0.79 ± 0.11* 
 TGFBR1 1 ± 0.18 0.59 ± 0.1* 0.64 ± 0.16* 
 PAI-1 1 ± 0.15 0.53 ± 0.14* 0.86 ± 0.25 
 ColIVα3 1 ± 0.14 1 ± 0.19 1.1 ± 0.2 
 Fibronectin 1 ± 0.12 0.9 ± 0.18 0.9 ± 0.29 
 S100A4 1 ± 0.13 1.1 ± 0.26 0.62 ± 0.1* 
WT    
 Col I 1 ± 0.23 1.5 ± 0.13* 1 ± 0.11 
 αSMA 1 ± 0.27 2 ± 0.51* 0.64 ± 0.11* 
 MCP-1 1 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.15* 0.65 ± 0.11* 
 TGFBR1 1 ± 0.21 1.7 ± 0.14* 0.92 ± 0.19 
 PAI-1 1 ± 0.18 1.7 ± 0.29* 0.61 ± 0.11* 
 ColIVα3 1 ± 0.44 3.1 ± 0.62* 0.91 ± 0.19 
 Fibronectin 1 ± 0.28 2 ± 0.39* 0.97 ± 0.082 
 S100A4 1 ± 0.19 1.4 ± 0.24* 0.74 ± 0.12* 
Gene, by MC typeEVFL-RAGEES-RAGE
RAGE−/−    
 Col I 1 ± 0.15 0.76 ± 0.15* 0.68 ± 0.09* 
 αSMA 1 ± 0.12 0.61 ± 0.07* 0.78 ± 0.1* 
 MCP-1 1 ± 0.09 0.43 ± 0.09* 0.79 ± 0.11* 
 TGFBR1 1 ± 0.18 0.59 ± 0.1* 0.64 ± 0.16* 
 PAI-1 1 ± 0.15 0.53 ± 0.14* 0.86 ± 0.25 
 ColIVα3 1 ± 0.14 1 ± 0.19 1.1 ± 0.2 
 Fibronectin 1 ± 0.12 0.9 ± 0.18 0.9 ± 0.29 
 S100A4 1 ± 0.13 1.1 ± 0.26 0.62 ± 0.1* 
WT    
 Col I 1 ± 0.23 1.5 ± 0.13* 1 ± 0.11 
 αSMA 1 ± 0.27 2 ± 0.51* 0.64 ± 0.11* 
 MCP-1 1 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.15* 0.65 ± 0.11* 
 TGFBR1 1 ± 0.21 1.7 ± 0.14* 0.92 ± 0.19 
 PAI-1 1 ± 0.18 1.7 ± 0.29* 0.61 ± 0.11* 
 ColIVα3 1 ± 0.44 3.1 ± 0.62* 0.91 ± 0.19 
 Fibronectin 1 ± 0.28 2 ± 0.39* 0.97 ± 0.082 
 S100A4 1 ± 0.19 1.4 ± 0.24* 0.74 ± 0.12* 

Data are mean ± SE. EV, empty vector.

*P < 0.05 relative to EV control.

Deletion of RAGE Is Renoprotective in STZ-Induced Diabetic Mice

Gene expression, extracellular matrix protein levels, and macrophage infiltration were examined in the cortex of kidneys from nondiabetic and STZ-induced diabetic wild-type (WT) and RAGE−/− mice at 24 weeks of diabetes. Plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin were similarly elevated in both diabetic WT and diabetic RAGE−/− mice (Fig. 1A and B). Urinary AER (Fig. 1C), creatinine clearance (Fig. 1D), glomerular damage, and GSI (Fig. 1E) all were elevated in diabetic WT mice but were significantly reduced in diabetic RAGE−/− mice. The TIA was elevated in the kidneys of diabetic WT and RAGE−/− mice (Fig. 1E). Although renal collagen IV staining was further increased in the cortex of diabetic RAGE−/− mice, glomerular collagen IV levels were reduced compared with those from diabetic WT mice (Fig. 1F). Furthermore, glomerular expansion, which was increased in diabetic WT mice, was absent in the kidneys of diabetic RAGE−/− mice (Fig. 1G). Similarly, genetic deletion of RAGE prevented increased expression of fibronectin and TGF-β1 protein induced by diabetes in the kidneys of diabetic WT mice (Fig. 1H and I).

Figure 1

Metabolic and renal functional parameters. A: Plasma glucose was measured using a glucometer. B: Glycated hemoglobin was determined by HPLC. C: Urinary AER was determined by ELISA. D: Creatinine clearance was determined by HPLC. E: Representative images of PAS-stained renal tissue (left) and graphs of TIA (top right), and GSI (bottom right). The images on the left show PAS staining of kidney cortex in WT, diabetic WT mice (WT D), RAGE-deficient mice (R[-]), and diabetic RAGE-deficient mice (R[-] D). For RT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from kidney cortexes of WT, WT D, R(-), and R(-) D mice (original magnification ×400; scale bar = 50 μm). GSI was determined at week 24. F: Immunostaining of collagen IV is significantly upregulated in kidneys from nondiabetic R(-) mice compared with kidneys from nondiabetic WT mice at 24 weeks of age. Furthermore, among all the groups, collagen IV expression was most significantly upregulated in R(-) D mouse kidneys, but the induction was less in the glomeruli in R(-) D mice compared with WT D mice (original magnification ×200; scale bar = 50 μm). Mesangial expansion (G) and fibronectin (H) and TGF-β1 (I) protein levels were quantified by ELISA. *P < 0.05 vs. WT; †P < 0.05 vs. R(−); ‡P < 0.05 vs. WT D. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 6–8 mice/group.)

Figure 1

Metabolic and renal functional parameters. A: Plasma glucose was measured using a glucometer. B: Glycated hemoglobin was determined by HPLC. C: Urinary AER was determined by ELISA. D: Creatinine clearance was determined by HPLC. E: Representative images of PAS-stained renal tissue (left) and graphs of TIA (top right), and GSI (bottom right). The images on the left show PAS staining of kidney cortex in WT, diabetic WT mice (WT D), RAGE-deficient mice (R[-]), and diabetic RAGE-deficient mice (R[-] D). For RT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from kidney cortexes of WT, WT D, R(-), and R(-) D mice (original magnification ×400; scale bar = 50 μm). GSI was determined at week 24. F: Immunostaining of collagen IV is significantly upregulated in kidneys from nondiabetic R(-) mice compared with kidneys from nondiabetic WT mice at 24 weeks of age. Furthermore, among all the groups, collagen IV expression was most significantly upregulated in R(-) D mouse kidneys, but the induction was less in the glomeruli in R(-) D mice compared with WT D mice (original magnification ×200; scale bar = 50 μm). Mesangial expansion (G) and fibronectin (H) and TGF-β1 (I) protein levels were quantified by ELISA. *P < 0.05 vs. WT; †P < 0.05 vs. R(−); ‡P < 0.05 vs. WT D. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 6–8 mice/group.)

Close modal

The renoprotective effect of RAGE deletion was observed despite the elevated renal expression of COL1A1, α-SMA, MCP-1 (CCL2), TGFBR1, C5AR1, COL4A3, fibronectin (FN1), and Ki67 (MKI67) in the diabetic WT and diabetic RAGE−/− mice (Fig. 2A–H). Renal MCP-1 protein levels were also elevated in kidneys from diabetic RAGE−/− mice (Fig. 2I). The macrophage markers CD68 and CD169 were elevated in RAGE−/− mouse kidneys and increased further in diabetic RAGE−/− mice (Fig. 2J and K); however, the glomerular CD169+-to-CD68+ ratio, a measure of macrophage activation, was similar in both diabetic WT and diabetic RAGE−/− mice (Fig. 2L).

Figure 2

Expression of fibrotic and inflammatory markers. The expression of various genes—COL1α1 (A), αSMA (B), MCP-1 (C), TGFBR1 (D) C5AR1 (E), COL4α3 (F), fibronectin (G), and Ki67 (H)—were significantly upregulated in kidney cortexes of RAGE-deficient mice (R[-]) and diabetic RAGE-deficient mice (R[-] D) compared with WT mice. Renal cortical MCP-1 protein levels were upregulated in diabetic WT mice (WT D) and were further upregulated in diabetic RAGE−/− mice (I). Glomerular CD68+ macrophages were increased in nondiabetic RAGE−/− mice and further increased in diabetic RAGE−/− mice (J). CD169+ macrophages were increased in WT D and further increased in diabetic RAGE−/− mice (K). The calculated glomerular CD169+-to-CD68+ macrophage ratio was increased in WT D and diabetic RAGE−/− mice at a similar level (L). *P < 0.05 vs. WT; †P < 0.05 vs. R(-); ‡P < 0.05 vs. WT D. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 6–8 mice/group).

Figure 2

Expression of fibrotic and inflammatory markers. The expression of various genes—COL1α1 (A), αSMA (B), MCP-1 (C), TGFBR1 (D) C5AR1 (E), COL4α3 (F), fibronectin (G), and Ki67 (H)—were significantly upregulated in kidney cortexes of RAGE-deficient mice (R[-]) and diabetic RAGE-deficient mice (R[-] D) compared with WT mice. Renal cortical MCP-1 protein levels were upregulated in diabetic WT mice (WT D) and were further upregulated in diabetic RAGE−/− mice (I). Glomerular CD68+ macrophages were increased in nondiabetic RAGE−/− mice and further increased in diabetic RAGE−/− mice (J). CD169+ macrophages were increased in WT D and further increased in diabetic RAGE−/− mice (K). The calculated glomerular CD169+-to-CD68+ macrophage ratio was increased in WT D and diabetic RAGE−/− mice at a similar level (L). *P < 0.05 vs. WT; †P < 0.05 vs. R(-); ‡P < 0.05 vs. WT D. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 6–8 mice/group).

Close modal

RAGE Deletion Results in Downregulation of TGF-β Inducible Signaling Pathways

Because renal function, GSI, mesangial expansion, and collagen IV expression were improved in the glomeruli of RAGE−/− mice despite overall increased expression levels of fibrotic and inflammatory markers, we decided to study further the renoprotective effect of RAGE deletion, focusing on the glomerulus, specifically in MCs. RNA sequencing experiments were performed on primary mouse WT and RAGE−/− MCs grown in the presence or absence of TGF-β. Multidimensional scaling analysis demonstrated distinct and reproducible differences among the four sample groups (Fig. 3A). The smear plot in Fig. 3B demonstrates significantly altered expression of 7,842 genes (red dots) following TGF-β treatment of WT MCs. Only 5,223 genes were significantly altered in by TGF-β in RAGE−/− MCs (Fig. 3C, red dots). A factorial analysis investigating the effect of RAGE deletion on TGF-β-mediated gene regulation demonstrated that 5,246 genes were RAGE dependent (Fig. 3D). In this analysis, red dots in the positive region show a greater fold induction in RAGE−/− MCs with TGF-β treatment, whereas those in the negative region demonstrate a reduced fold change in RAGE−/− MCs in response to TGF-β. This is more clearly demonstrated in the scatterplot of fold changes with TGF-β treatment in WT cells compared with RAGE−/− MCs (Fig. 3E). Relatively few genes show discordant fold changes.

Figure 3

RNA sequencing analysis of the effect of TGF-β on RAGE−/− mouse MCs. A: Multidimensional scaling plot of gene expression in TGF-β-treated (10 ng/mL) and control mouse MCs. B: Smear plot of gene expression changes in TGF-β-treated and control WT MCs. Genes with FDR-adjusted P values ≤0.05 are indicated by red dots. C: Smear plot of gene expression changes in TGF-β-treated and control RAGE−/− MCs. D: MA plot showing the effect of RAGE−/− on TGF-β-mediated regulation. The smear plot, based on factorial analysis, shows 5,246 genes, whose regulation of TGF-β is dependent upon RAGE (FDR-adjusted P ≤ 0.05). E: Scatterplot of fold changes with TGF-β treatment in WT cells versus knockout cells. The x-axis shows changes in WT cells and the y-axis shows changes in RAGE−/− cells. Genes with FDR-adjusted P values >0.05 are not shown. F: GSEA analysis of reactome gene pathways. The normalized enrichment score (NES) indicates the direction of pathway regulation. *The gene set is significant (FDR-adjusted P ≤ 0.05). G: Enrichment plot of cholesterol (top) and collagen (bottom) gene sets on a one-dimensional line of genes ranked from most upregulated (red) to most downregulated (blue). H: Heatmap of cholesterol biosynthesis genes (red represents low expression and yellow, high expression). I: Heatmap of collagen formation genes.

Figure 3

RNA sequencing analysis of the effect of TGF-β on RAGE−/− mouse MCs. A: Multidimensional scaling plot of gene expression in TGF-β-treated (10 ng/mL) and control mouse MCs. B: Smear plot of gene expression changes in TGF-β-treated and control WT MCs. Genes with FDR-adjusted P values ≤0.05 are indicated by red dots. C: Smear plot of gene expression changes in TGF-β-treated and control RAGE−/− MCs. D: MA plot showing the effect of RAGE−/− on TGF-β-mediated regulation. The smear plot, based on factorial analysis, shows 5,246 genes, whose regulation of TGF-β is dependent upon RAGE (FDR-adjusted P ≤ 0.05). E: Scatterplot of fold changes with TGF-β treatment in WT cells versus knockout cells. The x-axis shows changes in WT cells and the y-axis shows changes in RAGE−/− cells. Genes with FDR-adjusted P values >0.05 are not shown. F: GSEA analysis of reactome gene pathways. The normalized enrichment score (NES) indicates the direction of pathway regulation. *The gene set is significant (FDR-adjusted P ≤ 0.05). G: Enrichment plot of cholesterol (top) and collagen (bottom) gene sets on a one-dimensional line of genes ranked from most upregulated (red) to most downregulated (blue). H: Heatmap of cholesterol biosynthesis genes (red represents low expression and yellow, high expression). I: Heatmap of collagen formation genes.

Close modal

The GSEA analysis of the reactome gene pathways are shown in Fig. 3F. Pathways such as protein metabolism, cholesterol biosynthesis, immune system adaptation, extracellular matrix organization, class I MHC–mediated antigen presentation, collagen formation, axon guidance, apoptosis, carbohydrate metabolism, and translation are significantly downregulated in RAGE−/− MCs. On the other hand, only the generic transcription pathway is significantly upregulated in RAGE−/− MCs. For example, cholesterol biosynthesis and collagen formation gene sets exhibit striking downregulation (Fig. 3G). Downregulation of these pathways is consistent with their induction by diminished TGF-β in RAGE−/− MCs. A heatmap of cholesterol biosynthesis genes shows that TGF-β exposure causes upregulation of these genes in WT MCs, whereas these genes are downregulated in RAGE−/− MCs (Fig. 3H). Similarly, collagen synthesis genes are downregulated in RAGE−/− MCs; COL8A2 is one of the most significant differential expression events (FDR-adjusted P = 2.64E−39; Fig. 3I).

RAGE Deletion Promotes Profibrotic, Prosurvival, and Proinflammatory Gene Expression

RT-PCR analysis of gene expression revealed upregulation of several fibrotic and inflammatory genes, transcription factors, and cell survival genes in RAGE−/− MCs under baseline conditions. COL4A1, COL4A3, PKCα and PKCβ, and DIAPH1 (which is known to interact with RAGE [35]) were significantly downregulated (Table 1). The RAGE ligand S100A4 was upregulated 22-fold in RAGE−/− MCs.

HG had no effect on baseline gene expression in WT MCs; however, baseline expression of COL1A1 and MCP-1 was significantly elevated in RAGE−/− MCs under HG conditions (Table 2). TGF-β increased the expression of COL1A1, αSMA, PAI-1, fibronectin, and COL4A3 in WT MCs (Table 2). By contrast, the fold change in expression of these genes in response to TGF-β was attenuated in RAGE−/− MCs. α-SMA protein was increased in RAGE−/− MCs (Fig. 4A) compared with WT MCs. While TGF-β further increased α-SMA in WT MCs, it did not alter α-SMA levels in RAGE−/− MCs. MCP-1 protein was also elevated in control RAGE−/− MCs but was significantly reduced by TGF-β (Fig. 4B), a pattern similar to that seen with respect to MCP-1 RNA levels (Table 2). TGF-β increases fibronectin protein levels in both WT and RAGE−/− MCs, but the effect was attenuated in the RAGE−/− MCs, a pattern similar to that seen with respect to fibronectin RNA levels (Table 2). Collectively, these data demonstrate that RAGE−/− MCs are less responsive to TGF-β than WT MCs, confirming the trends observed upon review of the RNA sequencing data (see Fig. 3).

Figure 4

Protein expression in WT and RAGE−/− MCs treated with TGF-β. WT and RAGE−/− MCs were cultured in the presence of TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) under HG conditions for 3 days. A: Expression of αSMA protein was quantified by Western blotting. MCP-1 (B) and fibronectin (C) protein levels were determined by ELISA. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. WT control; **P < 0.05, TGF-β-treated RAGE knockout MCs vs. TGF-β-treated WT MCs. Cont, control.

Figure 4

Protein expression in WT and RAGE−/− MCs treated with TGF-β. WT and RAGE−/− MCs were cultured in the presence of TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) under HG conditions for 3 days. A: Expression of αSMA protein was quantified by Western blotting. MCP-1 (B) and fibronectin (C) protein levels were determined by ELISA. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 vs. WT control; **P < 0.05, TGF-β-treated RAGE knockout MCs vs. TGF-β-treated WT MCs. Cont, control.

Close modal

Deletion of RAGE Promotes MC Proliferation and Protects Against Apoptosis

Cell growth rate was significantly increased in RAGE−/− MCs compared with WT MCs (Fig. 5A). Propidium iodide staining demonstrated fewer dead (positive staining) RAGE−/− MCs over time than in WT MCs following FCS depletion (Fig. 5B). Staining for active caspase-3 following staurosporine treatment revealed fewer apoptotic nuclei in RAGE−/− MCs than in WT MCs (Fig. 5C and D). Based on these data, RAGE−/− MCs seemed to acquire a more proliferative and an antiapoptotic phenotype.

Figure 5

Cell proliferation, viability, and apoptosis in WT and RAGE−/− MCs. A: WT cells and RAGE-deficient (RAGE[-]) cells were cultured in DMEM containing 5% FCS. Cell numbers were counted on days 1, 3 and 7. B: WT and RAGE(-) MCs were cultured in DMEM without FCS and the total cell number and propidium iodide–positive (dead) cells were counted on days 1, 3 and 7. C: WT and RAGE(-) MCs were cultured in DMEM containing 2% FCS and treated with 12.5 nmol/L staurosporine to induce apoptosis. Active caspase-3 was immunostained, and cells with fragmented nuclei and active caspase-3 were counted (white arrows). RAGE(-) MCs are green fluorescent protein (GFP) positive. Images were captured using a ×60 objective with a ×12.5 digital zoom (scale bar = 20 μm). D: Significantly fewer RAGE(-) cells than WT cells were apoptotic. *P < 0.05.

Figure 5

Cell proliferation, viability, and apoptosis in WT and RAGE−/− MCs. A: WT cells and RAGE-deficient (RAGE[-]) cells were cultured in DMEM containing 5% FCS. Cell numbers were counted on days 1, 3 and 7. B: WT and RAGE(-) MCs were cultured in DMEM without FCS and the total cell number and propidium iodide–positive (dead) cells were counted on days 1, 3 and 7. C: WT and RAGE(-) MCs were cultured in DMEM containing 2% FCS and treated with 12.5 nmol/L staurosporine to induce apoptosis. Active caspase-3 was immunostained, and cells with fragmented nuclei and active caspase-3 were counted (white arrows). RAGE(-) MCs are green fluorescent protein (GFP) positive. Images were captured using a ×60 objective with a ×12.5 digital zoom (scale bar = 20 μm). D: Significantly fewer RAGE(-) cells than WT cells were apoptotic. *P < 0.05.

Close modal

Elevated TGF-β and ERK Signaling in MCs from RAGE−/− Mice

Smad3 and ERK phosphorylation were both significantly increased in RAGE−/− MCs compared with WT MCs, indicating increased activity of the TGF-β and ERK pathways, respectively (Fig. 6A and B). S100A4, a ligand known to signal through RAGE and Toll-like receptors (TLRs), was significantly upregulated in RAGE−/− cells (Fig. 6C). The level of p53 was also significantly reduced in RAGE−/− MCs (Fig. 6D), consistent with the antiapoptotic phenotype of these cells. S100A4 knockdown by siRNA increased p53 protein levels (Fig. 6E) and decreased expression of α-SMA, MCP-1, TGFBR1, COL4A3, PAI-1, and Ki67 in RAGE−/− MCs (Fig. 6F). These data support the view that RAGE deletion promotes the expression of cell survival genes and increases the baseline activity of profibrotic and inflammatory pathways.

Figure 6

RAGE deletion affects the expression of phospho-smad3, phospho-ERK, s100A4, and p53. Shown here is Western blotting of phospho-smad3 (A), phospho-ERK (Β), S100A4 (C), and p53 (D) in RAGE-deficient (RAGE[-]) MCs compared with WT MCs under low-glucose and HG conditions. E: RAGE(-) MCs were transfected with s100A4 siRNA (10 nmol/L), resulting in significantly decreased S100A4 and increased p53 protein levels. F: Knockdown of S100A4 in RAGE(-) MCs decreased the RNA levels of αSMA, MCP-1, TGFBR1, COL4A3, PAI-1, and Ki67 (F). *P < 0.05 vs. WT or siRNA control.

Figure 6

RAGE deletion affects the expression of phospho-smad3, phospho-ERK, s100A4, and p53. Shown here is Western blotting of phospho-smad3 (A), phospho-ERK (Β), S100A4 (C), and p53 (D) in RAGE-deficient (RAGE[-]) MCs compared with WT MCs under low-glucose and HG conditions. E: RAGE(-) MCs were transfected with s100A4 siRNA (10 nmol/L), resulting in significantly decreased S100A4 and increased p53 protein levels. F: Knockdown of S100A4 in RAGE(-) MCs decreased the RNA levels of αSMA, MCP-1, TGFBR1, COL4A3, PAI-1, and Ki67 (F). *P < 0.05 vs. WT or siRNA control.

Close modal

RAGE Modulates Inflammatory, Fibrotic, and Apoptotic Processes

Based on the data presented above, we hypothesized that RAGE may play a role in inflammatory, fibrotic, and cell survival processes under normal physiological conditions. RAGE knockdown by siRNA in WT MCs increased the expression of profibrotic and inflammatory genes (COL1A1, α-SMA, MCP-1, and TGFBR1; Supplementary Fig. 1). It is interesting to note that restoring the expression of FL-RAGE in RAGE−/− MCs decreased expression of COL1A1, α-SMA, MCP-1, TGFBR1, PAI-1, and S100A4 to levels observed in WT MCs (Table 3). These data clearly demonstrate anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic roles for FL-RAGE in MCs.

It is also interesting that ES-RAGE, a novel splice variant of RAGE, was equally as effective as FL-RAGE in restoring the expression of most genes in RAGE−/− MCs (Table 3). We explored this effect further and observed that HMGB1 increased the expression of COL1A1, α-SMA, NFκB-P65, TGFBR1, PAI-1, and COL4A3 in RAGE−/− MCs (Supplementary Fig. 2). However, when this experiment was repeated with ES-RAGE adenovirus–infected RAGE−/− MCs, HMGB1 had little effect on the expression of these genes.

By contrast, overexpression of FL-RAGE in WT MCs increased the expression of COL1A1, αSMA, MCP-1, TGFBR1, PAI-1, fibronectin, COL4A3, and S100A4 (Table 3). ES-RAGE decreased the expression of MCP-1, PAI-1, and S100A4 (Table 3) in these cells. Taken together, these data reveal a complex role for FL-RAGE in kidneys, where RAGE negatively regulates inflammatory and fibrotic processes under normal physiological conditions but also promotes these pathological processes when RAGE expression is increased.

In this study we examined the effect of genetic deletion of RAGE on gene expression in, and the structure and function of, diabetic kidneys. We observed the resolution of hyperfiltration, an early renal functional change seen in both human and experimental diabetes; less albuminuria; and less glomerular structural injury in diabetic RAGE−/− mice compared with diabetic WT mice. These occurred despite the increased expression of a range of well-characterized fibrotic and inflammatory markers in the kidney cortexes of diabetic RAGE−/− mice. Furthermore, increased macrophage infiltration was also observed in diabetic RAGE−/− mouse kidneys, but it is important to note that this was not accompanied by increased renal injury. It is interesting that a previous study demonstrated the requirement for RAGE expression to mediate HMGB1 activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathways in macrophages, but not to reduce TNF-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6 levels (36). It was also demonstrated that diabetic WT mice reconstituted with RAGE−/− bone marrow had improved renal function and reduced renal injury compared with diabetic WT mice reconstituted with WT bone marrow (37). These studies, along with our data, confirm that RAGE expression on hemopoietically derived immune cells contributes to the pathological changes seen in DN.

RNA sequencing of MCs derived from both WT and RAGE−/− mice revealed gene expression differences involving several signaling pathways relevant to DN. In particular, the effect of TGF-β on gene expression was attenuated in RAGE−/− MCs. RAGE is known to cooperate with TGF-β (5,38), the angiotensin II type 1 receptor subtype (3841), and TLR signaling (41) pathways, resulting in the amplification of fibrotic and inflammatory responses (3841). Our data are consistent with those from these studies, which demonstrate that renoprotection in RAGE−/− MCs is due in part to the reduced responsiveness to growth factor stimulation of these injurious pathways in DN.

Despite the reduced responsiveness to TGF-β, expression of profibrotic and inflammatory genes was increased in RAGE−/− MCs compared with WT MCs. Compensatory signaling via TGF-β, TLRs, and immune system pathways may account for this, as we observed elevated expression of S100A4, TGFBR1, TLR4, and C3aR1 (Table 1), as well as activated SMAD3 and ERK, which are downstream mediators of these pathways (Fig. 6). Many ligands mediate activation of TLR signaling, including S100A4, a member of the family of S100 calcium-binding proteins, which acts through TLR4 to activate MyD88, the transcription factor that drives nuclear factor-κB and the tyrosine kinases ERK1/2 and p38 expression in mononuclear cells (42). Liliensiek et al. (17) observed in the peritoneum the same proinflammatory pattern that we observed in the kidneys of RAGE−/− mice in our study, although they were studying a different disease context.

The prosurvival phenotype observed in RAGE−/− MCs may also contribute to renoprotection in diabetic RAGE−/− mice. Glomerular cells are lost through apoptosis in experimental DN (43), and apoptosis of MCs correlates with worsening albuminuria (44). Patients with mild diabetic renal injury display a sixfold increase in apoptotic glomerular cells, which is associated with a loss of kidney function (45).

RAGE restoration experiments in RAGE−/− MCs suggest a protective role for RAGE in the normal kidney against fibrotic and inflammatory processes. Delivery of FL-RAGE or ES-RAGE reversed the upregulation of profibrotic and inflammatory genes (Table 3). The reverse experiment, with knockdown of RAGE in WT MCs, complemented these observations and resulted in increased expression of fibrotic and inflammatory genes (Supplementary Fig. 1). These data support a homeostatic role for RAGE in normal kidney cells. RAGE plays a protective role under normal physiological conditions, in which it regulates the inflammatory response to a variety of different ligands, including AGEs. However, sustained activation of RAGE results in inflammation and promotes the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes (4648). Our RNA sequencing data indicate that RAGE enhances the TGF-β-mediated activation signaling pathways, including pathways related to protein metabolism, cholesterol biosynthesis, immune system adaptation, extracellular matrix organization, and collagen formation (Fig. 3). Consistent with our findings, Englert et al. (49) demonstrated that RAGE−/− mice developed more severe lung fibrosis than WT controls in a model of pulmonary fibrosis.

RAGE overexpression highlighted the complex role of RAGE in normal physiology. FL-RAGE delivery to WT MCs increased the expression of profibrotic and inflammatory genes, whereas ES-RAGE decreased the expression of some of these genes (Table 3). Our data results are consistent with those of previous reports of a pathological role for FL-RAGE when overexpressed (6) and the beneficial effect of ES-RAGE (7), the decoy receptor, in diabetes.

RAGE−/− MCs were resistant to apoptosis induced by staurosporine, through activation of caspase-3 (50), and by serum starvation (Fig. 5), potentially through upregulation of S100A4. Overexpression of S100A4 is observed in cancer (5153) and directly interacts with and results in the degradation of nuclear p53 (53). Consistent with these reports, decreased p53 protein levels were observed in RAGE−/− MCs (Fig. 6D), and knockdown of S100A4 resulted in increased p53 (Fig. 6E). The importance of S100A4 in fibrosis in other tissues has been previously been reported (52). Our findings suggest that upregulation of S100A4 contributes to the prosurvival and profibrotic phenotype of RAGE−/− MCs.

RAGE plays a major role in the development and progression of DN and is highly expressed in response to various RAGE ligands that are elevated in diabetes (54). Our findings identify a key physiological role for RAGE in the kidney by regulating the expression of profibrotic and inflammatory genes and by influencing cell survival under normal conditions. The direct targeting of FL-RAGE may therefore not be an ideal therapeutic approach; rather, strategies that target the AGE-RAGE interaction either by directly inhibiting ligands such as HMGB1 and AGEs, or by using a decoy receptor such as sRAGE, may be preferable.

S.H. is currently affiliated with the Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding. S.H. was supported by the Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation. This study was also supported by the Diabetes Australia Research Trust. M.E.C. is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council. P.K. was supported by the Vera Dalgleish Phillips Fellowship and the National Health and Medical Research Council. This study was also supported in part by the Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. S.H. researched data and wrote the manuscript. K.S., M.Z., W.T., M.M., A.D.M., E.B., M.C., B.H., S.P., B.W., G.H., R.P., A.E.-O., M.C.T., and P.K. researched data. J.F., M.E.C., and P.K. reviewed and edited the manuscript. P.K. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Bierhaus
A
,
Humpert
PM
,
Morcos
M
, et al
.
Understanding RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation end products
.
J Mol Med (Berl)
2005
;
83
:
876
886
[PubMed]
2.
Xie
J
,
Méndez
JD
,
Méndez-Valenzuela
V
,
Aguilar-Hernández
MM
.
Cellular signalling of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE)
.
Cell Signal
2013
;
25
:
2185
2197
[PubMed]
3.
Clynes
R
,
Moser
B
,
Yan
SF
,
Ramasamy
R
,
Herold
K
,
Schmidt
AM
.
Receptor for AGE (RAGE): weaving tangled webs within the inflammatory response
.
Curr Mol Med
2007
;
7
:
743
751
[PubMed]
4.
Moser
B
,
Desai
DD
,
Downie
MP
, et al
.
Receptor for advanced glycation end products expression on T cells contributes to antigen-specific cellular expansion in vivo
.
J Immunol
2007
;
179
:
8051
8058
[PubMed]
5.
Li
JH
,
Huang
XR
,
Zhu
HJ
, et al
.
Advanced glycation end products activate Smad signaling via TGF-beta-dependent and independent mechanisms: implications for diabetic renal and vascular disease
.
FASEB J
2004
;
18
:
176
178
[PubMed]
6.
Yamamoto
Y
,
Kato
I
,
Doi
T
, et al
.
Development and prevention of advanced diabetic nephropathy in RAGE-overexpressing mice
.
J Clin Invest
2001
;
108
:
261
268
[PubMed]
7.
Wendt
TM
,
Tanji
N
,
Guo
J
, et al
.
RAGE drives the development of glomerulosclerosis and implicates podocyte activation in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy
.
Am J Pathol
2003
;
162
:
1123
1137
[PubMed]
8.
Flyvbjerg
A
,
Denner
L
,
Schrijvers
BF
, et al
.
Long-term renal effects of a neutralizing RAGE antibody in obese type 2 diabetic mice
.
Diabetes
2004
;
53
:
166
172
[PubMed]
9.
Coughlan
MT
,
Thorburn
DR
,
Penfold
SA
, et al
.
RAGE-induced cytosolic ROS promote mitochondrial superoxide generation in diabetes
.
J Am Soc Nephrol
2009
;
20
:
742
752
[PubMed]
10.
Myint
KM
,
Yamamoto
Y
,
Doi
T
, et al
.
RAGE control of diabetic nephropathy in a mouse model: effects of RAGE gene disruption and administration of low-molecular weight heparin
.
Diabetes
2006
;
55
:
2510
2522
[PubMed]
11.
Soro-Paavonen
A
,
Watson
AM
,
Li
J
, et al
.
Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) deficiency attenuates the development of atherosclerosis in diabetes
.
Diabetes
2008
;
57
:
2461
2469
[PubMed]
12.
Tan
AL
,
Sourris
KC
,
Harcourt
BE
, et al
.
Disparate effects on renal and oxidative parameters following RAGE deletion, AGE accumulation inhibition, or dietary AGE control in experimental diabetic nephropathy
.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
2010
;
298
:
F763
F770
[PubMed]
13.
Manfredi
AA
,
Capobianco
A
,
Esposito
A
, et al
.
Maturing dendritic cells depend on RAGE for in vivo homing to lymph nodes
.
J Immunol
2008
;
180
:
2270
2275
[PubMed]
14.
Tian
J
,
Avalos
AM
,
Mao
SY
, et al
.
Toll-like receptor 9-dependent activation by DNA-containing immune complexes is mediated by HMGB1 and RAGE
.
Nat Immunol
2007
;
8
:
487
496
[PubMed]
15.
Ott
C
,
Jacobs
K
,
Haucke
E
,
Navarrete Santos
A
,
Grune
T
,
Simm
A
.
Role of advanced glycation end products in cellular signaling
.
Redox Biol
2014
;
2
:
411
429
[PubMed]
16.
Freeman
HC
,
Hugill
A
,
Dear
NT
,
Ashcroft
FM
,
Cox
RD
.
Deletion of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase: a new quantitive trait locus accounting for glucose intolerance in C57BL/6J mice
.
Diabetes
2006
;
55
:
2153
2156
[PubMed]
17.
Liliensiek
B
,
Weigand
MA
,
Bierhaus
A
, et al
.
Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) regulates sepsis but not the adaptive immune response
.
J Clin Invest
2004
;
113
:
1641
1650
[PubMed]
18.
Schulze-Lohoff
E
,
Hugo
C
,
Rost
S
, et al
.
Extracellular ATP causes apoptosis and necrosis of cultured mesangial cells via P2Z/P2X7 receptors
.
Am J Physiol
1998
;
275
:
F962
F971
[PubMed]
19.
Hagiwara
S
,
Makita
Y
,
Gu
L
, et al
.
Eicosapentaenoic acid ameliorates diabetic nephropathy of type 2 diabetic KKAy/Ta mice: involvement of MCP-1 suppression and decreased ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation
.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2006
;
21
:
605
615
[PubMed]
20.
Yonekura
H
,
Yamamoto
Y
,
Sakurai
S
, et al
.
Novel splice variants of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products expressed in human vascular endothelial cells and pericytes, and their putative roles in diabetes-induced vascular injury
.
Biochem J
2003
;
370
:
1097
1109
[PubMed]
21.
Kantharidis
P
,
Hagiwara
S
,
Brennan
E
,
McClelland
AD
.
Study of microRNA in diabetic nephropathy: isolation, quantification and biological function
.
Nephrology (Carlton)
2015
;
20
:
132
139
[PubMed]
22.
Dobin
A
,
Davis
CA
,
Schlesinger
F
, et al
.
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
.
Bioinformatics
2013
;
29
:
15
21
[PubMed]
23.
Liao
Y
,
Smyth
GK
,
Shi
W
.
featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
.
Bioinformatics
2014
;
30
:
923
930
[PubMed]
24.
Robinson
MD
,
McCarthy
DJ
,
Smyth
GK
.
edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data
.
Bioinformatics
2010
;
26
:
139
140
[PubMed]
25.
Subramanian
A
,
Tamayo
P
,
Mootha
VK
, et al
.
Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
15545
15550
[PubMed]
26.
Forbes
JM
,
Yee
LT
,
Thallas
V
, et al
.
Advanced glycation end product interventions reduce diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis [published correction appears in Diabetes 2006;55:862]
.
Diabetes
2004
;
53
:
1813
1823
[PubMed]
27.
Cefalu
WT
,
Wang
ZQ
,
Bell-Farrow
A
,
Kiger
FD
,
Izlar
C
.
Glycohemoglobin measured by automated affinity HPLC correlates with both short-term and long-term antecedent glycemia
.
Clin Chem
1994
;
40
:
1317
1321
[PubMed]
28.
Coughlan
MT
,
Thallas-Bonke
V
,
Pete
J
, et al
.
Combination therapy with the advanced glycation end product cross-link breaker, alagebrium, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in diabetes: synergy or redundancy?
Endocrinology
2007
;
148
:
886
895
[PubMed]
29.
Dunn
SR
,
Qi
Z
,
Bottinger
EP
,
Breyer
MD
,
Sharma
K
.
Utility of endogenous creatinine clearance as a measure of renal function in mice
.
Kidney Int
2004
;
65
:
1959
1967
[PubMed]
30.
Forbes
JM
,
Thallas
V
,
Thomas
MC
, et al
.
The breakdown of preexisting advanced glycation end products is associated with reduced renal fibrosis in experimental diabetes
.
FASEB J
2003
;
17
:
1762
1764
[PubMed]
31.
Hewitson
TD
,
Darby
IA
,
Bisucci
T
,
Jones
CL
,
Becker
GJ
.
Evolution of tubulointerstitial fibrosis in experimental renal infection and scarring
.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1998
;
9
:
632
642
[PubMed]
32.
Watson
AM
,
Gray
SP
,
Jiaze
L
, et al
.
Alagebrium reduces glomerular fibrogenesis and inflammation beyond preventing RAGE activation in diabetic apolipoprotein E knockout mice
.
Diabetes
2012
;
61
:
2105
2113
[PubMed]
33.
Thallas-Bonke
V
,
Thorpe
SR
,
Coughlan
MT
, et al
.
Inhibition of NADPH oxidase prevents advanced glycation end product-mediated damage in diabetic nephropathy through a protein kinase C-alpha-dependent pathway
.
Diabetes
2008
;
57
:
460
469
[PubMed]
34.
Benjamini
Y
,
Hochberg
Y
.
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
.
J R Stat Soc B
1995
;
57
:
289
300
35.
Rai
V
,
Maldonado
AY
,
Burz
DS
, et al
.
Signal transduction in receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE): solution structure of C-terminal rage (ctRAGE) and its binding to mDia1 [published correction appears in J Biol Chem 2012;287:11283]
.
J Biol Chem
2012
;
287
:
5133
5144
[PubMed]
36.
Kokkola
R
,
Andersson
A
,
Mullins
G
, et al
.
RAGE is the major receptor for the proinflammatory activity of HMGB1 in rodent macrophages
.
Scand J Immunol
2005
;
61
:
1
9
[PubMed]
37.
Tesch
G
,
Sourris
KC
,
Summers
SA
, et al
.
Deletion of bone-marrow-derived receptor for AGEs (RAGE) improves renal function in an experimental mouse model of diabetes
.
Diabetologia
2014
;
57
:
1977
1985
[PubMed]
38.
Fukami
K
,
Ueda
S
,
Yamagishi
S
, et al
.
AGEs activate mesangial TGF-beta-Smad signaling via an angiotensin II type I receptor interaction
.
Kidney Int
2004
;
66
:
2137
2147
[PubMed]
39.
Matsui
T
,
Yamagishi
S
,
Takeuchi
M
,
Ueda
S
,
Fukami
K
,
Okuda
S
.
Irbesartan inhibits advanced glycation end product (AGE)-induced proximal tubular cell injury in vitro by suppressing receptor for AGEs (RAGE) expression
.
Pharmacol Res
2010
;
61
:
34
39
.
40.
Nakamura
K
,
Yamagishi
S
,
Nakamura
Y
, et al
.
Telmisartan inhibits expression of a receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in angiotensin-II-exposed endothelial cells and decreases serum levels of soluble RAGE in patients with essential hypertension
.
Microvasc Res
2005
;
70
:
137
141
[PubMed]
41.
Ibrahim
ZA
,
Armour
CL
,
Phipps
S
,
Sukkar
MB
.
RAGE and TLRs: relatives, friends or neighbours
?
Mol Immunol
2013
;
56
:
739
744
[PubMed]
42.
Cerezo
LA
,
Remáková
M
,
Tomčik
M
, et al
.
The metastasis-associated protein S100A4 promotes the inflammatory response of mononuclear cells via the TLR4 signalling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis
.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
2014
;
53
:
1520
1526
[PubMed]
43.
Pesce
C
,
Menini
S
,
Pricci
F
, et al
.
Glomerular cell replication and cell loss through apoptosis in experimental diabetes mellitus
.
Nephron
2002
;
90
:
484
488
[PubMed]
44.
Mishra
R
,
Emancipator
SN
,
Kern
T
,
Simonson
MS
.
High glucose evokes an intrinsic proapoptotic signaling pathway in mesangial cells
.
Kidney Int
2005
;
67
:
82
93
[PubMed]
45.
Verzola
D
,
Gandolfo
MT
,
Ferrario
F
, et al
.
Apoptosis in the kidneys of patients with type II diabetic nephropathy
.
Kidney Int
2007
;
72
:
1262
1272
[PubMed]
46.
Chawla
D
,
Bansal
S
,
Banerjee
BD
,
Madhu
SV
,
Kalra
OP
,
Tripathi
AK
.
Role of advanced glycation end product (AGE)-induced receptor (RAGE) expression in diabetic vascular complications
.
Microvasc Res
2014
;
95
:
1
6
[PubMed]
47.
Tóbon-Velasco
JC
,
Cuevas
E
,
Torres-Ramos
MA
.
Receptor for AGEs (RAGE) as mediator of NF-kB pathway activation in neuroinflammation and oxidative stress
.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets
2014
;
13
:
1615
1626
[PubMed]
48.
Yan
SF
,
Ramasamy
R
,
Schmidt
AM
.
The receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) and cardiovascular disease
.
Expert Rev Mol Med
2009
;
11
:
e9
[PubMed]
49.
Englert
JM
,
Hanford
LE
,
Kaminski
N
, et al
.
A role for the receptor for advanced glycation end products in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
.
Am J Pathol
2008
;
172
:
583
591
[PubMed]
50.
Chae
HJ
,
Kang
JS
,
Byun
JO
, et al
.
Molecular mechanism of staurosporine-induced apoptosis in osteoblasts
.
Pharmacol Res
2000
;
42
:
373
381
.
51.
Ebralidze
A
,
Tulchinsky
E
,
Grigorian
M
, et al
.
Isolation and characterization of a gene specifically expressed in different metastatic cells and whose deduced gene product has a high degree of homology to a Ca2+-binding protein family
.
Genes Dev
1989
;
3
:
1086
1093
[PubMed]
52.
Mishra
SK
,
Siddique
HR
,
Saleem
M
.
S100A4 calcium-binding protein is key player in tumor progression and metastasis: preclinical and clinical evidence
.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2012
;
31
:
163
172
[PubMed]
53.
Orre
LM
,
Panizza
E
,
Kaminskyy
VO
, et al
.
S100A4 interacts with p53 in the nucleus and promotes p53 degradation
.
Oncogene
2013
;
32
:
5531
5540
[PubMed]
54.
Tanji
N
,
Markowitz
GS
,
Fu
C
, et al
.
Expression of advanced glycation end products and their cellular receptor RAGE in diabetic nephropathy and nondiabetic renal disease
.
J Am Soc Nephrol
2000
;
11
:
1656
1666
[PubMed]
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

Supplementary data