Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin as add-on therapy to metformin in Russian patients with T2DM.

Methods: In this double-blind trial conducted in 14 centers in Russia, 165 patients were randomized 2:1 to ipragliflozin (50 mg/day) or placebo for 24 weeks while continuing metformin. Patients who had HbA1c ≥7.0% at Week 12 received open-label ipragliflozin (50 mg/day) in addition to the blinded drug from Week 12-24.

Results: Significant reductions in HbA1c and body weight from baseline to Week 12 in favor of ipragliflozin were observed; the incidence of AEs was similar in both groups (Table). HbA1c and weight improvements were sustained from Week 12-24 in patients who remained on 50 mg ipragliflozin (mean change from Week 12: 0.16% and -0.48 kg, respectively; p>0.05). Uptitration to 100 mg ipragliflozin led to a further reduction in body weight (mean change from Week 12: -0.65 kg, P=0.004) and an additional 13% (9/69) achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 24. Incidence of AEs was similar in 50 mg (23.7%) and 100 mg groups (24.6%). No clinically significant changes in vital signs were noted during the study.

Conclusion: 50 mg Ipragliflozin added to metformin significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight after 12 weeks and showed a comparable safety profile as placebo. Uptitration to 100 mg/day conferred added benefits with no additional safety concerns.

Table. Efficacy and AE results from baseline to Week 12

       
    Baseline Iprag/Placebo EOT Week 12 Iprag/Placebo Change Iprag/Placebo *Adjusted mean difference to placebo (95% CI) *P value 
Efficacy endpoints (FAS) HbA1c, % 8.40 (0.94)/8.46 (0.96) 7.38 (0.90)/7.69 (1.11) -1.01 (0.85)/-0.77 (1.10) -0.26 (-0.53, 0.00) 0.048 
 Body weight, kg 92.88 (16.25)/89.54 (15.60) 90.87 (16.42)/88.92 (14.89) -2.01 (2.47)/-0.62 (2.14) -1.34 (-2.06, -0.61) <0.001 
Safety endpoints (SAF) AEs, n (%) 32 (29.1)/19 (34.5)  -  - 
 Drug-related AEs, n (%) 12 (10.9)/4 (7.3)  -  - 
       
    Baseline Iprag/Placebo EOT Week 12 Iprag/Placebo Change Iprag/Placebo *Adjusted mean difference to placebo (95% CI) *P value 
Efficacy endpoints (FAS) HbA1c, % 8.40 (0.94)/8.46 (0.96) 7.38 (0.90)/7.69 (1.11) -1.01 (0.85)/-0.77 (1.10) -0.26 (-0.53, 0.00) 0.048 
 Body weight, kg 92.88 (16.25)/89.54 (15.60) 90.87 (16.42)/88.92 (14.89) -2.01 (2.47)/-0.62 (2.14) -1.34 (-2.06, -0.61) <0.001 
Safety endpoints (SAF) AEs, n (%) 32 (29.1)/19 (34.5)  -  - 
 Drug-related AEs, n (%) 12 (10.9)/4 (7.3)  -  - 

*ANCOVA model with treatment as fixed effect, center as random effect, and baseline value as covariate. Data are presented as mean (SD) unless stated otherwise. Ipragliflozin (FAS = 109; SAF = 110) and placebo (FAS or SAF = 55). AEs, adverse events; EOT, end of treatment; FAS, full analysis set; Iprag, ipragliflozin; SAF, safety analysis set.

Disclosure

M.V. Shestakova: None. J.P. Wilding: Other Relationship; Self; Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Company, Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. W. Wilpshaar: Employee; Self; Astellas. R.N. Tretter: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.. V.L. Orlova: None. A.F. Verbovoy: None.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.