We sought to determine if interactive, case-based online continuing medical education (CME) could improve the clinical competence of primary care physicians (PCPs) and diabetologists/endocrinologists (D/Es) regarding clinical application of guidelines and individualized diabetes management. A 3-question case-based and 1-question confidence linked pre-/post-assessment study design and McNemar’s chi-squared test were used. P values are shown as a measure of significance. The activity launched May 3, 2017, and data collected through June 6, 2017. PCPs (N=473) demonstrated a lower baseline knowledge level compared to D/Es (N=198) as shown by the following baseline data:

  • 35% of PCPs compared to 61% of D/Es corrently individualized treatment for a patient with T2D and HF.

  • 22% of PCPs compared to 37% of D/Es correctly individualized treatment for a patient with newly diagnosed T2D and multiple comorbidities.

Significant overall improvements (P < .05) were seen:

  • 26% more D/Es and 36% more PCPs correctly individualized the T2D treatment regimen of a patient with comorbid HF.

  • 15% more D/Es and 11% more PCPs addressed the importance of lifestyle modification in a patient with newly diagnosed T2D.

  • 47% more D/Es and 49% more PCPs correctly individualized pharmacotherapy intensification in a patient with T2D.

  • 20% of D/Es and 32% of PCPs reported an increase in confidence initiating or intensifying treatment in patients with T2D.

This study demonstrates the success of interactive, case-based education on improving clinical competence of D/Es and PCPs related to management of T2D. PCPs were found to have lower baseline knowledge and competence compared to D/Es, which is not surprising given the level of specialization in both groups. PCPs may need more foundational education related to guidelines and T2D management than D/Es.

Disclosure

A. Larkin: None. K.L. Hanley: None. C.S. Healy: None. A. Le: None.

© 2018 by the American Diabetes Association.
2018
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.