Background: The Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) was recently published. Thus, we here present a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis (MTC) of major randomized clinical trials to determine Glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists’ effects on CV outcomes in patients with T2DM.

Methods: A comprehensive, systematic review was conducted using Embase and MEDLINE databases. Studies were included in the MTC meta-analysis if they were (1) RCTs and (2) evaluated the effects of one of the GLP-1 agonists vs. placebo on CV outcomes as their primary endpoint. The primary outcomes were CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. Hospitalization for HF was evaluated as a secondary endpoint.

Results: A total of 202 publications were identified and reviewed, of which 198 were excluded based on study design or relevance to the research question. A total of 4 trials, including 33,457 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were retained analysis. The pairwise meta-analysis showed a 13% reduction in death from cardiovascular causes in patients who received GLP-1 agonists vs. those who received placebo (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96, I2=0%, P=0.592). The NMA showed no differences among all the interventions, with liraglutide the preferred agent (53%) followed by semaglutide (18%). The pairwise meta-analysis showed no significant reduction in non-fatal MI events between the two groups (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04, I2=19.5%, P=0.293). Like the pairwise meta-analysis, the NMA results showed no reduction in non-fatal MI events with semaglutide as the preferred agent (66%), followed by liraglutide (19%).

Conclusion: GLP-1 therapy was associated with a significant reduction in CV death. However, GLP-1 agonists seem to have a safety profile comparable to placebo in terms of reducing non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke events, and rates of HF hospitalization.

Disclosure

O. Alfayez: None. M.S. Al Yami: None. R. Alsheikh: None.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.