We revisited the well-known inverse relationship between A1C and hypoglycemia using data from phase 1 of the Diamond clinical trial that compared usual care to real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in subjects with type 1 diabetes using MDI and with A1C levels from 7.5% to 9.9%. Data from 157 subjects (104 and 53 in the CGM and control groups, respectively) were analyzed. The percentages of sensor glucose (SG) values ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L) (“%≤70”) and of those indicating clinically significant hypoglycemia (≤54 mg/dL [≤3.0 mmol/L]) (“%≤54”) during the initial and final weeks of the 24-week study were calculated for each subject and compared to corresponding baseline and 24-week A1C values. At baseline, the percent ≤70 was similar for the two groups (p=0.24), as was the percent ≤54 (p=0.10). There was a trend toward more hypoglycemia for subjects near the minimum allowed A1C value of 7.5% (Figure A). At 24 weeks (Figure B), there were significant between-group differences in favor of CGM at both thresholds, and the association between decreasing A1C and increasing exposure to SG values ≤54 mg/dL was attenuated. Subjects in the CGM group averaged ∼16 minutes/day with SG ≤54 mg/dL. These data suggest patients with access to CGM alerts and alarms take appropriate and timely measures to nearly eliminate exposure to clinically meaningful hypoglycemia. CGM allows safe intensification of MDI therapy and achievement of near-normal A1C levels.
Disclosure
M. Reddy: Advisory Panel; Self; Roche Diabetes Care Health and Digital Solutions. Other Relationship; Self; Dexcom, Inc.. M. Gimenez: None. V. Moscardo: None. N. Oliver: Advisory Panel; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Roche Diabetes Care Health and Digital Solutions, Medtronic. Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Roche Diabetes Care Health and Digital Solutions. Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Takeda Development Centre Europe Ltd..
© 2018 by the American Diabetes Association.
2018
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.