Background: There were several case reports on the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and bullous pemphigoid (BP). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the risk of BP and other skin-related adverse effects (AEs) in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving DPP-4i treatment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: In this meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 10, 2018. The study included RCTs assessing the effects of DPP-4is treatment compared with placebo in type 2 diabetic patients with reports of skin-related events. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated by Peto's methods.

Results: 46 randomized placebo-controlled trials with reports of skin-related events were included (n = 59,332) in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, the risk of BP significantly increased in DPP-4i treatment (OR = 7.39, 95% CI 2.59-21.07, I2=0%, P = 0.0002) (Figure 1), and the overall risk of skin-related AEs also increased in DPP-4i treatment (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.08-1.59, I2=38%, P = 0.006) (Figure 2).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggested that DPP-4i treatment was associated with a significant increase in the risks of BP and skin-related AEs.

Disclosure

W. Yang: None. X. Cai: None. S. Zhang: None. X. Han: None. L. Ji: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Roche Pharma, Sanofi.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.