Background and Aim: T2D increases the prevalence of steatosis and steatohepatitis (NASH). The aim was to assess the relationship between T2D and two histological features of liver injury defining the need for therapy: disease activity grade (NAS) and fibrotic scar (F).

Methods: 2363 patients with metabolic steatosis were screened for the phase 3 elafibranor trial RESOLVE-IT (NTC02704403) with a liver biopsy centrally scored for NAS and F. 71% had obesity, 47% dyslipidemia, 81% MetS. 35% had T2D, 88% of them managed by ≥1 OAD or insulin. Prevalence of active disease (NAS≥4), significant fibrosis (F≥2) and progressive NASH (NAS≥4 with F≥2, i.e., "at-risk" of hepatic outcomes) and clinical and biochemical NASH phenotype was assessed according to the T2D status.

Results: The overall prevalence of "at-risk" NASH was 53%, 65% for T2Ds (n=835), and 45% for non-T2Ds (n=1528). T2D was a significant risk factor (p<0.001) for “at-risk” NASH (OR=2.20, 95% CI [1.85;2.62]), NAS≥4 (OR=1.74, 95% CI [1.40;2.16]) and F≥2 (OR=2.50, 95% CI [2.08;3.01]). The association between T2D and “at risk” NASH was independent of age, gender or BMI. T2D patients had higher mean NAS scores (4.96 vs. non-T2Ds: 4.47; p<0.001) and higher mean fibrosis stage (2.17 vs. non-T2D: 1.67; p<0.001). Liver injury markers ALT, AST, GGT or CK18 were higher (p<0.001) in “at-risk” NASH patients but were similar in T2Ds vs. non-T2Ds. Fibrosis serum markers such as TIMP-1, HA, A2M, or P3NP were elevated in “at-risk” NASH patients (p<0.001) and were higher in T2Ds vs. non-T2Ds (p<0.001). In both non-T2D and T2D, HbA1c and glucose homeostasis markers remained higher in “at-risk” NASH (p<0.001).

Conclusion: In patients with metabolic steatosis, T2D is associated with necroinflammation and fibrosis and independently increases the risk of developing “at-risk” NASH, highlighting the need for active surveillance of liver injury in T2D patients to identify those in need for clinical intervention.

Disclosure

B. Staels: None. V. Ratziu: Other Relationship; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. A.J. Sanyal: Consultant; Self; Ardelyx, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Exhalenz, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Hemoshear, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Nimbus Therapeutics, Nitto Denko, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Pfizer Inc. Employee; Self; Sanyal Bio. Research Support; Self; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Conatus Pharmaceuticals Inc., Echosens, Galectin Therapeutics Inc., Immuron Ltd, Merck & Co., Inc., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Sequanna. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Akarna Therapeutics, GENFIT, Natural Shield, NewCo LLC, Tiziana. Other Relationship; Self; Elsevier, UpToDate. S. Francque: Consultant; Self; GENFIT. S.A. Harrison: Advisory Panel; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc. A. Roudot: Employee; Self; GENFIT. J. Brozek: Employee; Self; GENFIT. Y. Hajji: Employee; Self; GENFIT. S. Megnien: Employee; Self; GENFIT. D.W. Hum: Employee; Self; GENFIT. P. Birman: Employee; Self; GENFIT. R. Hanf: Employee; Self; GENFIT. B. Cariou: Board Member; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Consultant; Self; GENFIT, Sanofi-Aventis. Research Support; Self; Amgen Inc., Pfizer Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott, Akcea Therapeutics, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.