Background: Relationship between blood pressure (BP) and blood glucose control is still unsure. This study aimed to find whether visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of BP could be an independent risk factor for blood glucose control.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 95254 Chinese primary care diabetic patients from Oct. 2014 to Nov. 2018 with repeated measurements of BP and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) every 3 months, including 3 cohorts: Putuo District diabetes cohort (PTD, N=43590), Xuhui District diabetes cohort (XHD, N=45451) and Changning District diabetes cohort (CND, N=6213). The VVV of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was evaluated by average successive difference (ASD), and glucose control was evaluated by “FPG well-controlled proportion” (FPG≤7mmol/L as “well-controlled”), over 16 follow-ups. Logistic regression was used to explore the association of SBP ASD and FPG well-controlled proportion. The full model adjusted the baseline characteristics considering age, gender, BMI, exercise, medication and diet. Model was built in PTD and validated in the other 2 cohorts.

Results: Patients in PTD can be divided into 3 groups by VVV of SBP, which were “stable,” “fluctuating” and “highly fluctuating” groups. With “stable” group as reference, higher VVV of SBP was associated with lower FPG well-controlled proportion. In PTD, “fluctuating” group, OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.13-1.24; “highly fluctuating” group, OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.35-1.49. Results were consistent in the 2 validated cohorts and ORs for the “highly fluctuating” group were 2.37, 95% CI: 2.23-2.52 and 1.34, 95% CI: 1.15-1.56. In the whole population (N =95254), “highly fluctuating” group was associated with the worst blood glucose control with OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.62-1.73.

Conclusion: High VVV of SBP could be an independent risk factor for blood glucose control, which suggests extra surveillance for those with highly fluctuating SBP.

Disclosure

S. Zhang: None. L. Xie: None. W. Zhang: None. B. Qian: None.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.