The objective of this retrospective real-world observational study was to compare 6-month (mo) adherence and persistence among patients (pts) initiating weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), dulaglutide (DU) vs. semaglutide (SEMA) or DU vs. exenatide QW (EQW) BCise pen in the U.S., using claims from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) between August 2017 and June 2019 (index date=earliest GLP-1RA fill date). Pts ≥18 yrs old, with T2D, no claim for GLP-1 RAs in the 6 mos pre-index period, ≥1 claim for DU, SEMA or EQW during the index period, and continuous enrollment 6 mos pre- and post-index were included. DU users were propensity-matched 1:1 to SEMA (3,852 pairs) or EQW (1,879 pairs) users. Matched cohorts (DU:SEMA/DU:EQW) were balanced in baseline characteristics and the mean age was 54/55 years with approximately 49/51% males, respectively. At 6 mos, DU users were more likely to be adherent [Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)≥80%] than SEMA (odds ratio [OR]=1.986, 95% CI=[1.81, 2.18]) or EQW users (2.06 [1.81, 2.34]) (table). Cox regression showed that DU users were less likely to discontinue therapy than SEMA (hazard ratio [HR]= 0.71, 95% CI=[0.66, 0.76]) or EQW users (0.59 [0.53, 0.65]) (table). At 6-mos follow-up, pts initiating DU had higher medication adherence, and were more persistent to their treatment, compared to pts initiating either SEMA or EQW.

Disclosure

R. Mody: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Yu: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Employee; Spouse/Partner; LifeLabs. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. B.K. Nepal: None. M. Konig: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Grabner: Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.