Objective: An indirect treatment comparison (ITC) evaluated the efficacy and safety differences between 2 ready-to-use severe hypoglycemia rescue treatments, nasal glucagon (NG, Eli Lilly and Company) and liquid stable glucagon rescue pen (GRP, Xeris Pharmaceuticals), in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Systematic literature reviews identified 3 randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of NG versus reconstituted injectable glucagon (IG), and 3 trials of GRP versus IG. No head-to-head trials of NG versus GRP were identified. The Bayesian fixed-effect network meta-analysis was used to perform the ITC. Endpoints included the proportion of participants achieving treatment success (defined as increase in blood glucose to ≥70 mg/dL or an increase of ≥20 mg/dL from nadir blood glucose within 30 mins), maximum blood glucose, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). In order to more closely match the study populations, participants with a nadir blood glucose value of ≤54 mg/dL were analyzed.

Results: A similar proportion of GRP (98.9% [279/282]) and NG participants (99.4% [155/156]) achieved treatment success (Wald method p=0.63). The mean max blood glucose values were 220 mg/dL for GRP and 168 mg/dL for NG, with a significant treatment difference between GRP and NG, while adjusting IG as a comparator (17.32 mg/dL, 95% credible interval: [3.94, 30.97]). Proportions of participants experiencing ≥1 TEAE were 48.8% for GRP and 38.5% for NG (odds ratio: 1.31 [0.67, 2.31]). Subgroup analyses showed consistent results.

Conclusion: NG and GRP had comparable efficacy in reversing insulin-induced hypoglycemia in adults with diabetes. NG had a mean max blood glucose below 180 mg/dL, which may have implications on the re-establishment of euglycemia after severe hypoglycemia rescue.

Disclosure

Y. Yan: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. C. J. Child: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. K. Syring: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Q. Wang: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. R. J. Threlkeld: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company.

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.