Visual Abstract

Simple metabolic indices are necessary in large-scale epidemiological studies to follow β-cell function (βCF) in obese youth at risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Using a math model (AJP Endo 2020) of insulin sensitivity (IS) and βCF from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) we aimed to: a) validate mDI against euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic and hyperglycemic clamps in obese youth with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and T2D (age 15.1±1.8 yrs; BMI 36.2±6.0 kg/m2), and b) compare mDI estimated without insulin (mDI w/o I) against mDI with insulin and oral DI (oDI; insulinogenic index/fasting insulin) for predicting dysglycemia. Model-derived parameters correlated with clamp-derived ones: model vs. clamp IS (R2=0.47), model-βCF vs. clamp 1st and 2nd-phase insulin secretion (R2=0.65, R2=0.66), and mDI vs. clamp-derived DI (cDI) (R2=0.56, all P<0.001). mDI w/o I correlated with mDI with insulin (R2=0.91), cDI (R2=0.54), and oDI (R2=0.57, all P<0.001). mDI w/o I correlated strongly with OGTT glucose area under the curve (G-AUC) (Fig. A). mDI w/o I was markedly reduced in IGT (68%) vs. NGT youth, while oDI was reduced by only 29%, and cDI by 27%. mDI w/o I was superior to oDI in detecting IGT (Fig. B) and comparable to oDI in detecting T2D (Fig. C). Because mDI w/o I is more sensitive than oDI in detecting dysglycemia and does not need insulin, it is a cost effective surrogate of βCF applicable to large-scale studies.

Disclosure

J. Ha: None. J. Kim: None. A. Sherman: None. S. A. Arslanian: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Other Relationship; Self; AstraZeneca, Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.