Visual Abstract

Background: Screening T2DM for NASH fibrosis using specific markers is mandatory, as liver enzymes are often normal despite advanced fibrosis. LIVERFASt (LF), a serum marker with CPT code for assessing liver fibrosis (LF-Fib), activity and steatosis had high performance for identifying severe NASH in T2DM.

Aim: To demonstrate that LF-Fib is an alternative to biopsy (LB) for the estimation of the transition rate to fibrosis [F1 stage or more (TRF1)], in T2DM NAFLD with better performances than transient elastography (TE) and FIB4.

Methods: TRF1 was evaluated using Cox-Mantel HazardRatios [HR(95%CI), logrank comparison] with a modeling of hazard from birth to age of LB, in prospectively collected NAFLD pts with concomitant LB and LF, TE, FIB4.

Results: N=583pts were included, 52% T2DM, 56%males, median (range) age 59.5% (18-85), HbA1c 6.6% (4.7-12), BMI 31.5 (20-54)kg/m2 (obesity 59%). The estimation of TRF1 [HR(95%CI)] using LF-Fib was similar to that of LB in both T2DM [0.67 (0.56-0.80) vs. 0.65( 0.54-0.79)], and no-T2DM [1.50 (1.26-1.78) vs. 1.54 (1.27-1.86)], respectively, with earlier TRF1 in no-T2DM (logrank p<0.0001). The performance for estimating TRF1 was less fit to that of LB in both T2DM and no-T2DM groups for TE and FIB4 (Figure)

Conclusion: Validated biomarkers such as LIVERFASt should allow a powerful analysis of fibrosis progression in T2DM similar to LB and better screening strategies for stratifying T2DM.

Disclosure

V. Deledinghen: None. M. Munteanu: Consultant; Self; Fibronostics. I. Alam: Advisory Panel; Self; Fibronostics. A. Delamarre: None. B. Lebail: None. H. Marraud-des-grottes: None. M. Irlès-depé: None. M. Decraecker: None. J. Foucher: None. J. Hiriart: None. R. Quiambao: Employee; Self; Fibronostics.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.