The current staging system for T1D development is used for participant selection in prevention trials. This system is based on multiple Ab+ and the presence or absence of dysglycemia, but does not address C-peptide measures or single Ab+ individuals. Since a limited number of Ab+ individuals are available for trials, we used TrialNet Pathway to Prevention (TNPTP) study data to assess whether a composite glucose and C-peptide measure, Index60, could identify single Ab+ individuals (designated as Stage 0) with comparable risk to those in Stages 1 or 2 for progression to Stage 3. Table 1A compares normoglycemic Stage 0 individuals with Index60 values above the median (>-0.045) of the full TNPTP cohort (n=6107) vs. those at Stage 1 with Index60 below the median (< -0.045). Table 1B compares those at Stage 0 with dysglycemia and higher Index60 vs. those at Stage 2 with lower Index60. In both comparisons, Index60 stratification identified Stage 0 individuals with metabolic features characteristic of T1D (e.g., lower C-peptide with higher glucose) and comparable 5-year risk to Stage 1 or Stage 2 individuals. Thus, by considering individuals with 1 Ab and C-peptide measures, the current staging system could be improved for risk discernment and to identify appropriate eligibility for prevention trials.

Disclosure

E.K.Sims: Speaker's Bureau; Medscape, American Diabetes Association. D.D.Cuthbertson: None. E.Bosi: None. C.Evans-molina: Advisory Panel; Provention Bio, Inc., DiogenX, Avotres Inc., Neurodon, MaiCell Therapeutics, Other Relationship; Isla Technology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Nimbus Therapeutics, Research Support; Lilly, Astellas Pharma Inc. M.J.Redondo: None. B.M.Nathan: None. H.M.Ismail: Consultant; Rise Therapeutics. L.M.Jacobsen: None. J.Sosenko: None.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.