Background: Genome-wide polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown high specificity and sensitivity in predicting type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk in Europeans. However, PRS-driven information on other ethnic groups is sparse, including Asian Indians (AI), who have a heightened risk for T2D. We examined the predictive efficacy of ancestry-derived (PRSAI) and European-derived (PRSEU) with a clinical risk score (CRS) of T2D.

Methods: Weighted PRSs were computed using 2921 variants (common and rare) from (Punjabi/Sikh) genome-wide association studies and 432 variants from European meta-analyses studies in 4,602 individuals (2,574 cases and 2,028 controls) of the Asian Indian Diabetes Heart Study/Sikh Diabetes Study. Both Ancestry-specific PRSAI and European PRSEU were validated on 9372 UK Biobank South Asian individuals (1943 cases/7429 controls).

Results: Ancestry-specific PRSAI showed 36.2% improved efficacy than PRSEU in Punjabi Asian Indians. Similarly, Ancestry-specific PRSAI was 18.6% superior to PRSEU in Asian Indians from UKBB based on Nagelkerke’s R2. Sensitivity analysis explained enhanced sensitivity (area under the curve-AUC) of ancestry-specific PRS over PRSEU in predicting T2D risk.

Conclusions: Our data suggest expanding genetic studies in diverse ethnic groups to exploit the full potential of PRS to improve health outcomes. More genetic evaluations, specifically in understudied/underrepresented populations, would help increase the transferability of genome-wide polygenic scores across racial and ethnic groups to make their integration into clinical practice easier.

Disclosure

G.K.Tung: None. M.Rout: None. D.K.Sanghera: None.

Funding

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK082766, R01DK118427); Presbyterian Health Foundation

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.