Objective: CGM improves glycemic control and mitigates hypoglycemia using office visits for older adults with T1D. During COVID-19 pandemic, a hybrid (in-office and telemedicine) care model was implemented. Data on impact of hybrid care model on glycemic control in older adults with T1D are limited.

Methods: Demographic, clinical characteristics, and CGM metrics of older adults (age ≥65 yrs) with T1D were retrieved from electronic health records from 2 periods: pre-pandemic (April 1, 2019-March 1, 2020) and during pandemic (September 1, 2020 to August 31, 2021) (adjusted for length of follow-up).

Results: 299 (47% male; mean age 72±4 years; 51% pump users) older adult CGM users were seen in both periods. Comparison of CGM metrics (Table) between time periods showed no changes in overall control (mean glucose 170±31 vs 168±33 mg/dL; p=0.75), glucose management indicator (GMI) (7.4 vs 7.3% p=0.65) or coefficient of variation (CV) (36% vs 35%; p=0.82). During hybrid model of care, time in-range (64±15 vs 72±15%; p<0.001) improved, while time <70 mg/dL did not increase.

Conclusion: Glycemic control using a hybrid-care model was maintained compared with in-person visits in older adults with T1D using CGM without impacting risk of hypoglycemia. Further studies can clarify how to routinely use a hybrid-care model in older adults with T1D.

Disclosure

E.Toschi: Advisory Panel; Eli Lilly and Company. A.Adam: None. R.Hurlbert: None. N.Frimpong: None. C.Slyne: None. L.M.Laffel: Advisory Panel; Medtronic, Lilly Diabetes, Novo Nordisk, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Roche Diagnostics, Provention Bio, Inc., Consultant; Dexcom, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Medscape. M.Munshi: Consultant; Sanofi.

Funding

Thomas J. Beatson, Jr. Foundation

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.