Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has shown to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in diabetic pregnancies. We investigated the use of CGM-derived metrics and normally monitored glucose measures in women with gestational diabetes (GDM) to study maternal and neonatal outcomes and postpartum glucose metabolism.

Methods: Sixty women with GDM were recruited prior to scheduled labor induction or caesarean section (C-section). A blinded Dexcom G6 Pro CGM was used for 10 days, starting 1-3 days predelivery. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered at 6-24 weeks postpartum with a subset of participants (n=28) using an additional blinded CGM for 10 days.

Results: Thirty-three participants had a vaginal delivery, 13 an unplanned (primary)C-section and 14 a repeat C-section. Infants of women having either an induction (25/33; 75.8%) or primary C-section (10/13;76.9%) were significantly more likely than repeat C-section-(4/14; 28.6%) to have neonatal hypoglycemia (χ²test= 10.7; p=0.005). Mothers treated with medication during pregnancy had a higher rate of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates and neonatal hypoglycemia (28/39; 72%) compared to diet alone (11/21; 52%) (p=.048). No direct association was demonstrated between the CGM-derived metrics prior to delivery and the postnatal glucose adaptation in the newborn. While there was only a slight positive relationship of mean glucose and glycemic variability in early postdelivery and postpartum OGTT values, there were strong linear associations of postpartum OGTT-derived estimates (mean OGTT) and postpartum CGM metrics (MBG r=.72, P<0.001; TITR r=-.74, p <0.001; MAGE r=.82 p<0.001).

Conclusion: GDM is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including LGA and neonatal hypoglycemia. Further larger studies are needed to assess pre- and postpartum CGM metrics and their relationship with delivery in women with GDM, neonatal outcomes, and OGTT.

Disclosure

K. Elkind-Hirsch: Research Support; Novo Nordisk A/S, Dexcom, Inc. Consultant; Dexcom, Inc. Advisory Panel; Lilly Diabetes. M. Armatta: None. E. Veillon: None. S. Schiavon: None. G. Cappon: None.

Funding

Dexcom, Inc. (IIS-2021-120)

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.