Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of faster-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp) compared to insulin aspart (Iasp) in adults with type 1 diabetes using non-automated insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

Methods: In this double-blinded crossover trial participants were randomly assigned to start with Fiasp or Iasp for 16 weeks and then switch to the alternate therapy for another 16 weeks following a 3-week washout period. Insulin pump settings were adjusted every 3 weeks based on CGM and insulin pump data. Primary outcome was the between-treatment difference in time in range (TIR: 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) from week 14 to 16. Secondary outcomes included other CGM metrics and HbA1c. Safety outcomes included injection site reactions.

Results: Forty adults (20 males) with a median (IQR) age of 54 (44-61) years, type 1 diabetes duration of 27 (20-34) years, HbA1c 59 (55-65) mmol/mol or 7.5 (7.2-8.1) %, BMI 25.7 (24.5-30.3) kg/m2 and total daily insulin dose 37 (29-52) IE completed both study arms. At 16 weeks, TIR was (mean ± SD) 60.6 ± 12.1% for Iasp and 62.5 ± 12.3% for Fiasp, p = 0.24; time above range (>10.0 mmol/L) was 31.5 ± 12.6% for Iasp and 30.1 ± 11.3% for Fiasp, p=0.30; and time below range (<3.9 mmol/L) was 7.8 ± 5.5% for Iasp and 7.5 ± 6.1% for Fiasp, p=0.89. The coefficient of variation was significantly higher with Iasp compared to Fiasp (35.9 ± 4.9% vs 34.0 ± 3.7%, p=0.03). At week 16, HbA1c was 58.0 ± 6.6 mmol/mol with Iasp and 57.5 ± 6.9 mmol/mol with Fiasp (p= 0.43). No differences were observed in SAE including severe hypoglycemia and diabetes ketoacidosis. Fiasp had numerically more events of burning sensation at injection site than Iasp.

Conclusion: At 16 weeks, after frequent adjustments of insulin pump settings, no differences between Fiasp and Iasp treatment were observed in TIR, TAR, TBR and HbA1c in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump and CGM. However, Fiasp significantly reduced glycemic variability compared to Iasp.

Disclosure

A.G. Ranjan: None. S. Schmidt: Employee; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk A/S. H. Andersen: None. K. Nørgaard: Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Medtronic. Advisory Panel; Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Novo Nordisk A/S. Research Support; Novo Nordisk A/S. Advisory Panel; Convatec. Research Support; Zealand Pharma A/S.

Funding

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen is the sponsor of this investigator-initiated trial. Novo Nordisk provided financial support to the conduct of the study and supplied the study medication.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.