Introduction: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are recommended for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, the comparative effectiveness and safety of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin is unknown. We compared these two drugs for CV and safety events.

Methods: In three US claims databases (commercial and Medicare), we identified adults with T2D who initiated dapagliflozin or empagliflozin during 08/2014-06/2020. Endpoints evaluated were 2-point MACE (a composite of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), MI, stroke, all-cause death, and safety outcomes (diabetic ketoacidosis, amputations, fractures, urinary tract infections, genital infections, acute kidney injury, and hypoglycemia). Database-specific models were weighted using propensity score matching-weights to adjust for confounding, and hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled across databases.

Results: We identified 107,602 dapagliflozin and 272,014 empagliflozin initiators. Compared with empagliflozin, dapagliflozin initiators were younger (mean age 56 vs 61 years) and had less CV disease at baseline (19% vs 31%). After adjusting for 129 confounders, compared with empagliflozin at both 10 mg and 25 mg doses, dapagliflozin showed similar risk for most CV outcomes, including MI/stroke (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.88-1.03). However, dapagliflozin initiators had a higher risk of HHF (HR=1.17, 1.02-1.33), driven by the lower dose of dapagliflozin (HR5mg=1.23, 1.04-1.46 for dapagliflozin 5mg; HR10mg=1.08, 0.88-1.32 for dapagliflozin 10mg). Compared to those on empagliflozin, dapagliflozin initiators had a lower risk of genital infections (HR=0.93, 0.90-0.96) across all doses and a similar risk of the other safety outcomes.

Conclusion: Dapagliflozin has similar CV benefits at doses proven effective in cardiovascular outcome trials, i.e., dapagliflozin 10mg, but the 5 mg dose may not have similar CV effectiveness.

Disclosure

H. Shin: None. J.M. Paik: None. B.M. Everett: Consultant; Novo Nordisk. Research Support; Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, Provention Bio, Inc. R. Glynn: Research Support; Amarin Corporation, Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc. D.J. Wexler: Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. E. Patorno: Research Support; Boehringer-Ingelheim, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Funding

Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (DB-2020C2-20326)

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.