Murine pancreatic endocrinogenesis has been extensively studied, but human data remain scarce due to limited sample availability. Here, we first built a large collection of human embryonic and fetal pancreases covering the first trimester of pregnancy to explore human endocrinogenesis. Using an experimental pipeline combining in toto staining, tissue clearing, and light-sheet fluorescence microscopy, we show that insulin-, glucagon-, and somatostatin-positive cells appear simultaneously at Carnegie stage (CS) 16. This contrasts with rodents, in which glucagon-positive cells appear first, followed by insulin-positive and, finally, somatostatin-positive cells and highlights interspecies differences. We also detected bihormonal endocrine cells in 7 of 9 human pancreases between CS16 and CS18, which were no longer detected at later stages. We observed that cell distribution within human fetal islets resembles adult mouse islets, with a core of β-cells surrounded by α- and δ-cells, differing from a more complex arrangement in adult human islets. This, in connection with the small size of human fetal islets when compared with adult islets, suggests that adult human islets may form by fusion of preexisting islets, in contrast to the mouse fission model. Together, our study provides a detailed and comprehensive description of the spatiotemporal dynamics of human pancreatic endocrinogenesis.

Article Highlights

  • Data on human pancreas development are limited and derived from two-dimensional staining. We overcome this using in toto staining, tissue clearing, and light-sheet imaging.

  • We sought to understand when and where endocrine cells first emerge and how they cluster.

  • First, endocrine cell types appear simultaneously, and early pancreases contain bihormonal cells. There are morphometric differences between fetal and adult islets.

  • We propose a mechanism of adult islet formation by fusion: a new base to reconstitute in vitro islet neogenesis.

The pancreas is a mixed gland mainly composed of exocrine tissue. The endocrine component is organized into small clusters, named islets of Langerhans, constituting about 1% of the pancreatic mass. Each adult islet contains a mean of 1,500 cells, including β-, α-, and δ-cells that produce and secrete insulin (INS), glucagon (GCG), and somatostatin (SST), respectively.

During development, the pancreas arises from the foregut endoderm and undergoes differentiation into exocrine and endocrine tissues. The majority of information related to pancreas development has been derived from rodents, using in vitro and in vivo experimental systems (1). For instance, GCG+ cells appear first at embryonic day 10.5 in mouse, followed by INS+ cells 1 day later and, finally, SST+ cells at embryonic day 13.5 (2). In humans, far less is known, but there exist obvious differences between rodent and human adult islets. For instance, in rodents, islets are organized with a core of β-cells surrounded by α- and δ-cells, whereas cell organization in human islets is more stochastic (3). This suggests differences in the spatiotemporal dynamics of endocrinogenesis and islet morphogenesis between mouse and human, which formed the basis of the present study.

The combination of light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) and tissue clearing has enabled three-dimensional (3D) visualization of tissue architecture with unprecedented detail (4). We recently used LSFM to investigate β-cell development in the early human pancreas (5). In the present study, we compare, for the first time, the spatiotemporal dynamics of INS, GCG, and SST cell differentiation during the first trimester of pregnancy, highlighting interspecies differences between human and mouse. Additionally, we uncover morphometric differences between fetal and adult human islets, suggesting a novel mechanism for human adult islet formation through the fusion of human fetal islets.

Human Pancreas Procurement

Human embryonic and fetal pancreatic tissues were collected through the INSERM HuDeCA program, following French bioethics legislation and INSERM guidelines (5). Sample selection and age determination, given in Carnegie stages (CSs) and postconceptional weeks (PCWs) for fetal stages, were determined as in the work of Villalba et al. (5). Age and sex of specimens used in each figure are presented in Supplementary Table 1.

Human adult pancreatic tissues were provided by the Human Islet Core facility of St. Louis Hospital (Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France) with signed informed consents (registered under no. PFS12-006 by the French Agency of Biomedicine).

3D Immunostaining, Imaging, and Processing

Embryonic and fetal samples were fixed, stained, and cleared following an iDISCO plus modified protocol (4,5). Image acquisition, processing, and visualization were performed as previously described (5). Samples were scanned at ×4 with a digital zoom of ×1.66, providing a resolution of 0.979 µm of pixel size. The primary and secondary antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

3D Analysis and Quantification

The measurements of endocrine clusters number, volume, and distribution were performed as described (5). To quantify the percentage of intercalated and nonintercalated endocrine clusters, the shortest distance was measured from each endocrine cluster to the SOX9+ epithelium.

2D Immunofluorescence Imaging

For two-dimensional (2D) imaging, human pancreases were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained as previously described (5). The antibodies used are included in Supplementary Table 2.

2D Analysis and Quantification

The number of bihormonal INS+GCG+ clusters at fetal stage (PCW 10) was manually counted using FIJI (6), with a minimum of 100 INS+ cells per sample (n = 3). The distribution of endocrine cell types within fetal and adult islets was measured with the software PyCreas (7), and a minimum of 25 islets per sample was quantified (n = 3 per age). These values are measured in relative radius (arbitrary units), in which 0 represents the center and 1 the edge of the islet. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests were used to calculate the P values for comparison between cell types.

Data and Resource Availability

The data sets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on request. No applicable resources were generated during this study.

Early Pancreatic Endocrinogenesis

Previously, we demonstrated that the first INS+ clusters appear in the embryonic pancreas at approximately CS16. Here, we observe that the first GCG+ and SST+ clusters are also detected at CS16, present only in the dorsal bud, indicating that all three cell types appear at a similar age (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Video 1). Interestingly, we also detect specimens containing bihormonal clusters at early stages (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Video 2). From CS16 to CS18, the number of endocrine clusters remains low (Fig. 1C), with each cluster containing 1–5 cells (Fig. 1D–F).

Figure 1

Temporal determination of first endocrine cells in the pancreatic primordium. A and B: LSFM staining showing early clusters of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ cells at CS16 and CS18 costained for SOX9. Both monohormonal and bihormonal clusters are shown in B. Green and white arrows depict the INS and the GCG signals of a bihormonal INS+GCG+ cluster. Scale bar: 200 µm. C: Quantification of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters at CS16–18. Each dot represents an independent sample. DF: Quantification in 2D of the number of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ cells per cluster at CS17, in three independent samples per staining. Each dot represents an independent cluster.

Figure 1

Temporal determination of first endocrine cells in the pancreatic primordium. A and B: LSFM staining showing early clusters of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ cells at CS16 and CS18 costained for SOX9. Both monohormonal and bihormonal clusters are shown in B. Green and white arrows depict the INS and the GCG signals of a bihormonal INS+GCG+ cluster. Scale bar: 200 µm. C: Quantification of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters at CS16–18. Each dot represents an independent sample. DF: Quantification in 2D of the number of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ cells per cluster at CS17, in three independent samples per staining. Each dot represents an independent cluster.

Close modal

From CS16 to CS18, 7 of 9 samples showed bihormonal clusters. All types of double-positive hormonal clusters were detected (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Figs. 1A and 2A). Three of 9 samples contained INS+SST+ clusters (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Video 3), and 2D immunostaining at CS18 demonstrated the existence of bihormonal cells (Fig. 2B and B′), which were not detected at fetal (Fig. 2C and C′) or adult (Fig. 2D and D′) stages. Similarly, INS+GCG+ clusters were detected in 2 of 9 samples from CS16 to CS18 (Supplementary Fig. 1A and Supplementary Video 4), and single-cell resolution highlighted bihormonal cells (Supplementary Fig. 1B and B). At fetal stages, only 5% of INS+ cells remained INS+GCG+ (Supplementary Fig. 1C and C, Supplementary Fig. S3), and no double-positive cells were detected in the adult pancreas (Supplementary Fig. 1D and D). Finally, GCG+SST+ clusters were detected from CS16 to CS18 in 2 of 9 samples (Supplementary Fig. 2A and Supplementary Video 5), and 2D immunostaining validated the existence of bihormonal cells (Supplementary Fig. 2B and B). These cells were not detected at PCW10 (Fig. 2C and C′) nor in the adult pancreas (Fig. 2D and D′). We also performed some triple staining (INS, GCG, and SST) but did not observe triple-positive cells.

Figure 2

Identification of bihormonal INS+SST+ cells at CS17–18. A: Representative LSFM staining at CS18 showing bihormonal INS+SST+ clusters. Green arrows depict the INS signal and red arrows the SST signal of two bihormonal INS+SST+ clusters (green and red arrows). BD′: 2D staining revealing the coexpression of INS and SST in the same cell at CS17 but not at fetal stage (PCW10) nor in the adult pancreas. 2D immunofluorescence images were acquired using a IXplore Spin Microscope (Olympus). Scale bars: 200 µm (A), 50 µm (BD), and 10 µm (B′–D′).

Figure 2

Identification of bihormonal INS+SST+ cells at CS17–18. A: Representative LSFM staining at CS18 showing bihormonal INS+SST+ clusters. Green arrows depict the INS signal and red arrows the SST signal of two bihormonal INS+SST+ clusters (green and red arrows). BD′: 2D staining revealing the coexpression of INS and SST in the same cell at CS17 but not at fetal stage (PCW10) nor in the adult pancreas. 2D immunofluorescence images were acquired using a IXplore Spin Microscope (Olympus). Scale bars: 200 µm (A), 50 µm (BD), and 10 µm (B′–D′).

Close modal

Spatial Dynamics of Endocrine Cells Across Development

We next determined the spatial location of the different endocrine cell populations. INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters were found preferentially aligned to the longitudinal axis of the primordium rather than the periphery (Fig. 3A–C and Supplementary Video 6). We quantitatively measured these 3D distributions by mapping them to the centroid of the SOX9+ pancreatic epithelium in z-slices from three pancreases. In all, the vast majority of endocrine clusters were located closer to the center and almost absent in the periphery (Fig. 3D–F), suggesting the existence of a niche in the center of the pancreas promoting the endocrine differentiation.

Figure 3

Spatial determination of endocrine cell location in the pancreatic primordium. AF: Representative staining and histograms displaying the distribution of endocrine cells across the pancreatic epithelium in Z-stack from CS16 to CS23 for INS+ (A, D), GCG+ (B, E), and SST+ (C, F) clusters. The yellow dashed line represents a sagittal section. Scale bar: 200 µm. GI: Quantification of the percentage of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters that are inside (intercalated, red) or outside (nonintercalated, blue) of the pancreatic epithelial tree (n = 4–5 per stage).

Figure 3

Spatial determination of endocrine cell location in the pancreatic primordium. AF: Representative staining and histograms displaying the distribution of endocrine cells across the pancreatic epithelium in Z-stack from CS16 to CS23 for INS+ (A, D), GCG+ (B, E), and SST+ (C, F) clusters. The yellow dashed line represents a sagittal section. Scale bar: 200 µm. GI: Quantification of the percentage of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters that are inside (intercalated, red) or outside (nonintercalated, blue) of the pancreatic epithelial tree (n = 4–5 per stage).

Close modal

In rodent embryos, endocrine cells are first observed in the epithelium and next delaminate to reach the parenchyma (8). Less is known in humans and we used our 3D approach to determine the dynamic profile of each endocrine cell type in relation to the epithelial tree. We observed that most of them are located within the SOX9+ tree at early stages, before CS23 (Fig. 3G–I, Supplementary Fig. 4A and C). On the other hand, at fetal stages, half of the fetal endocrine clusters—either INS+, GCG+, or SST+—are found outside of the tree (Fig. 3G–I, Supplementary Fig. 4B and D), demonstrating parallel migration patterns for all endocrine cell types.

Quantification in 23 samples from CS16 to fetal stages demonstrated a sharp increase from CS22 for both INS+ (Fig. 4A, D, and G) and SST+ (Fig. 4C, F, and I) clusters. This pattern was different for GCG+ clusters, whose number increases at fetal stages (Fig. 4B, E, and H). Unexpectedly, the number of INS+ clusters was lower than SST+ at the fetal stage, which does not match with the β- to δ-cell ratio observed in the adult pancreas. However, 3D measures of the fraction of each cell type revealed that INS+ clusters account for half of the endocrine volume (Fig. 4J). Thus, INS+ clusters, even if fewer than SST+ clusters, are bigger (Fig. 4K–M).

Figure 4

Quantitative determination of endocrine cell clusters and islet morphometry. AF: Representative staining of the distribution of endocrine cells at CS20 (AC) and fetal (PCW13) stages (DF). GI: Quantification of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters from CS16 to fetal stages. Each dot represents an independent sample. J: Volume (vol) of each cluster population per total endocrine volume at fetal (PCW10–13) stages (mean ± SD; n = 4). KM: Representative Z-stack of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters at fetal (PCW13) stage. N and O: Representative INS, GCG, and SST staining in fetal (PCW11) stages and adult islets. Nuclei stained with Hoechst-33342 (white). P: Volume distribution of INS+ clusters at CS20 and fetal (PCW11) stage (n = 3 per age) compared with adult [from a previously published data set (9)]. Q and R: Representative INS, GCG, and SST staining in (Q) fetal (PCW13) and (R) adult islets. S: Bar graphs displaying the distance of each cell type to the centroid of the islet at fetal (PCW13) and adult stages. n = 3. ***P ≤ 0.001. Each dot represents an independent sample. Scale bars: 200 µm (AC), 500 µm (DF), and 10 µm (N, O, Q, R). a.u., arbitrary units.

Figure 4

Quantitative determination of endocrine cell clusters and islet morphometry. AF: Representative staining of the distribution of endocrine cells at CS20 (AC) and fetal (PCW13) stages (DF). GI: Quantification of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters from CS16 to fetal stages. Each dot represents an independent sample. J: Volume (vol) of each cluster population per total endocrine volume at fetal (PCW10–13) stages (mean ± SD; n = 4). KM: Representative Z-stack of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ clusters at fetal (PCW13) stage. N and O: Representative INS, GCG, and SST staining in fetal (PCW11) stages and adult islets. Nuclei stained with Hoechst-33342 (white). P: Volume distribution of INS+ clusters at CS20 and fetal (PCW11) stage (n = 3 per age) compared with adult [from a previously published data set (9)]. Q and R: Representative INS, GCG, and SST staining in (Q) fetal (PCW13) and (R) adult islets. S: Bar graphs displaying the distance of each cell type to the centroid of the islet at fetal (PCW13) and adult stages. n = 3. ***P ≤ 0.001. Each dot represents an independent sample. Scale bars: 200 µm (AC), 500 µm (DF), and 10 µm (N, O, Q, R). a.u., arbitrary units.

Close modal

Islet Morphometry in Fetal and Adult Stages

We compared the volumes of INS+ clusters at early (CS20) and late (fetal) stages with those of adult human islets by incorporating recently published 3D data (9). At CS20, most of the INS+ clusters (75.33% ± 2.30%) fit into the smallest islet size category (<25,000 µm3) and at fetal stage, the vast majority (88.52% ± 0.66%) display a volume smaller than 100,000 µm3. These volumes are considerably smaller than the mean volume of an adult INS+ cluster (between 3,200,000 and 6,400,000 µm3). This reveals that fetal islets are much smaller than adult ones (Fig. 4N–P).

When we compared the distribution of the different endocrine cell types within the islets at fetal versus adult stages, we observed that the different endocrine cell types display different locations. In fetal islets, INS+ cells located in the center, surrounded by both GCG+ and SST+ cells, whereas in the adult, these three endocrine cell types are distributed stochastically, with no preferential cell distribution (Fig. 4Q–S).

Improving the development of stem cell–derived human islet cells is crucial for advancing novel therapies for type 1 diabetes, with current protocols focusing on mimicking endocrinogenesis (10). However, most of our understanding of islet cell differentiation comes from research on mouse pancreas development, mainly due to the scarcity of human samples. We accessed a significant collection of developing pancreases, thanks to the HuDeCA consortium (https://hudeca.com). Here, we used an experimental pipeline comprising in toto staining, tissue clearing, and LSFM imaging to unravel human islet endocrinogenesis during the first trimester of pregnancy.

By 3D analyses, we previously revealed that INS+ cells emerge by CS16 (5), 2 weeks earlier than observed in previous studies (11). In the present work, we demonstrate that GCG+ and SST+ cells also appear earlier than detected by conventional staining techniques (12–14). Interestingly, in the mouse embryonic pancreas, α-cells appear first, followed by β- and δ-cells (2). In zebrafish, β-cells are the first to appear, followed by δ- and α-cells (15). Here, we detect in the human embryonic pancreas the three endocrine cell populations at the same stage (CS16), underscoring notable interspecies differences. These findings indicate that the differentiation dynamics of INS+, GCG+, and SST+ cells in the human embryonic pancreas are more synchronized than previously thought. Our work highlights the importance of 3D analyses in identifying rare cell types during early development.

In mice, INS+GCG+ cells are present at early stages of endocrinogenesis, along with monohormonal cells, whereas few GCG+SST+ cells have been detected (16). In humans, the existence of bihormonal cells in the developing pancreas analyzed by single-cell transcriptomics or by immunostaining has been debated (12,14,17,18). Here, an intriguing aspect of our findings is that a significant number of samples contain bihormonal endocrine cells at CS16–18 with all possible combinations of bihormonal cells. We found a lot of variability among the samples with a mean of ∼30% of bihormonal clusters, but we believe that more samples are needed to get robust data. Finally, bihormonal cells are detected in a recurrent fashion in protocols aiming to produce pancreatic endocrine cells from stem cells (19). This observation underscores the complexity of endocrine cell differentiation, suggesting that the mechanisms involved may be more intricate than previously understood.

Islets are micro-organs dispersed in the pancreatic parenchyma. It is well established that in rodent, an islet does not form by clonal expansion but through the aggregation of endocrine cells differentiated from multiple endocrine progenitors (20), and a similar model has been proposed for human islets (21). At late fetal stages in mice, endocrine cells form a large area in the center of the pancreas that will give rise through fission to islets with a core of INS+ cells surrounded by GCG+ and SST+ cells (22). The mechanism of islet morphology seems different between rodent and human. In fact, the mean volume of each embryonic/fetal islet is significantly lower, by an order of magnitude, than in the adult pancreas. Additionally, these small human fetal islets resemble adult mouse fetal islets (a core of β-cells surrounded by α- and δ-cells), as described by others (14,23–25). To reach the size and the arrangement of α-, β-, and δ-cells of human islets, we propose a mechanism of fusion of preexisting small human islets, containing a core of β-cells surrounded by α- and δ-cells, which aggregate during development to give rise to bigger adult islets displaying a stochastic distribution of endocrine cell types (Supplementary Fig. S5). Altogether, this approach enabled us to elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of human pancreatic endocrinogenesis in an unprecedented manner.

This article contains supplementary material online at https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.27901659.

Funding. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 874839 (R.S.), INSERM cross-cutting program HuDeCA 2018 (to R.S., A.C., and S.M.-G.), Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale EQU201903007793 (to R.S.), l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-CE16-0021-01 to A.C.), the Foundation Bettencourt Schueller (to R.S.), and the Fondation Francophone pour la Recherche sur le Diabete (to R.S.). The R.S. laboratory belongs to the Laboratoire d’Excellence consortium Revive (Investissements d'Avenir ANR-10-LABX-73-01). A.V. is supported by postdoctoral grant from Laboratoire d’Excellence consortium Revive. A.C. is a CIFAR fellow in the McMillan multiscale human program. The A.C. laboratory is supported by the DIM C-BRAINS and funded by the Conseil Régional d’Ile-de-France.

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. A.V. and V.A. performed and analyzed experiments. A.V., A.C., and R.S. designed the experiments, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. M.T. and S.M.-G. collected the human embryo samples. R.S., Y.G., and A.C. supervised the study and obtained funding. R.S. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

1.
Gittes
GK
.
Developmental biology of the pancreas: a comprehensive review
.
Dev Biol
2009
;
326
:
4
35
2.
Herrera
PL
,
Huarte
J
,
Sanvito
F
,
Meda
P
,
Orci
L
,
Vassalli
JD
.
Embryogenesis of the murine endocrine pancreas; early expression of pancreatic polypeptide gene
.
Development
1991
;
113
:
1257
1265
3.
Brissova
M
,
Fowler
MJ
,
Nicholson
WE
, et al
.
Assessment of human pancreatic islet architecture and composition by laser scanning confocal microscopy
.
J Histochem Cytochem
2005
;
53
:
1087
1097
4.
Belle
M
,
Godefroy
D
,
Couly
G
, et al
.
Tridimensional visualization and analysis of early human development
.
Cell
2017
;
169
:
161
173.e12
5.
Villalba
A
,
Gitton
Y
,
Inoue
M
, et al
.
A 3D atlas of the human developing pancreas to explore progenitor proliferation and differentiation
.
Diabetologia
2024
;
67
:
1066
1078
6.
Schindelin
J
,
Arganda-Carreras
I
,
Frise
E
, et al
.
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
.
Nat Methods
2012
;
9
:
676
682
7.
Asuaje Pfeifer
M
,
Langehein
H
,
Grupe
K
, et al
.
PyCreas: a tool for quantification of localization and distribution of endocrine cell types in the islets of Langerhans
.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
2023
;
14
:
1250023
8.
Bakhti
M
,
Böttcher
A
,
Lickert
H
.
Modelling the endocrine pancreas in health and disease
.
Nat Rev Endocrinol
2019
;
15
:
155
171
9.
Lehrstrand
J
,
Davies
WIL
,
Hahn
M
,
Korsgren
O
,
Alanentalo
T
,
Ahlgren
U
.
Illuminating the complete β-cell mass of the human pancreas- signifying a new view on the islets of Langerhans
.
Nat Commun
2024
;
15
:
3318
3311
10.
Balboa
D
,
Iworima
DG
,
Kieffer
TJ
.
Human pluripotent stem cells to model islet defects in diabetes
.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
2021
;
12
:
642152
11.
Jennings
RE
,
Berry
AA
,
Kirkwood-Wilson
R
, et al
.
Development of the human pancreas from foregut to endocrine commitment
.
Diabetes
2013
;
62
:
3514
3522
12.
Jeon
J
,
Correa-Medina
M
,
Ricordi
C
,
Edlund
H
,
Diez
JA
.
Endocrine cell clustering during human pancreas development
.
J Histochem Cytochem
2009
;
57
:
811
824
13.
Jennings
RE
,
Berry
AA
,
Strutt
JP
,
Gerrard
DT
,
Hanley
NA
.
Human pancreas development
.
Development
2015
;
142
:
3126
3137
14.
Riedel
MJ
,
Asadi
A
,
Wang
R
,
Ao
Z
,
Warnock
GL
,
Kieffer
TJ
.
Immunohistochemical characterisation of cells co-producing insulin and glucagon in the developing human pancreas
.
Diabetologia
2012
;
55
:
372
381
15.
Biemar
F
,
Argenton
F
,
Schmidtke
R
,
Epperlein
S
,
Peers
B
,
Driever
W
.
Pancreas development in zebrafish: early dispersed appearance of endocrine hormone expressing cells and their convergence to form the definitive islet
.
Dev Biol
2001
;
230
:
189
203
16.
Jørgensen
MC
,
Ahnfelt-Rønne
J
,
Hald
J
,
Madsen
OD
,
Serup
P
,
Hecksher-Sørensen
J
.
An illustrated review of early pancreas development in the mouse
.
Endocr Rev
2007
;
28
:
685
705
17.
Riopel
M
,
Li
J
,
Fellows
GF
,
Goodyer
CG
,
Wang
R
.
Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical analysis of the 8-20 week human fetal pancreas
.
Islets
2014
;
6
:
e982949
18.
Olaniru
OE
,
Kadolsky
U
,
Kannambath
S
, et al
.
Single-cell transcriptomic and spatial landscapes of the developing human pancreas
.
Cell Metab
2023
;
35
:
184
199.e5
19.
Pagliuca
FW
,
Millman
JR
,
Gürtler
M
, et al
.
Generation of functional human pancreatic β cells in vitro
.
Cell
2014
;
159
:
428
439
20.
Deltour
L
,
Leduque
P
,
Paldi
A
,
Ripoche
MA
,
Dubois
P
,
Jami
J
.
Polyclonal origin of pancreatic islets in aggregation mouse chimaeras
.
Development
1991
;
112
:
1115
1121
21.
Scharfmann
R
,
Xiao
X
,
Heimberg
H
,
Mallet
J
,
Ravassard
P
.
Beta cells within single human islets originate from multiple progenitors
.
PLoS One
2008
;
3
:
e3559
22.
Glorieux
L
,
Sapala
A
,
Willnow
D
, et al
.
Development of a 3D atlas of the embryonic pancreas for topological and quantitative analysis of heterologous cell interactions
.
Development
2022
;
149
:
dev199655
23.
Adams
MT
,
Blum
B
.
Determinants and dynamics of pancreatic islet architecture
.
Islets
2022
;
14
:
82
100
24.
Bonner-Weir
S
,
Sullivan
BA
,
Weir
GC
.
Human islet morphology revisited: human and rodent islets are not so different after all
.
J Histochem Cytochem
2015
;
63
:
604
612
25.
Gregg
BE
,
Moore
PC
,
Demozay
D
, et al
.
Formation of a human β-cell population within pancreatic islets is set early in life
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2012
;
97
:
3197
3206
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.