In Brief

Mind-body interventions utilize the mind’s capacity to affect the body and its physiological responses. They thereby influence health. The response to stress (the “fight or flight” reaction) may be automatic, but recovery toward relaxed parameters (“the relaxation response”) can be learned through self-regulation and the regular use of mind-body interventions. Many of these interventions originate from Eastern healing practices. Western science has found some of them to be helpful as adjunct modalities in the treatment of disease, and their use is increasing.

Mind-body medicine focuses on the communication between mind and body and the powerful ways in which emotional, mental, social, and spiritual factors can directly affect health. Western, or allopathic, medicine tends to consider the scientific, or medical, model of medicine superior to mind-body therapies. It often has negated the fact that one’s mind has any affect on the body. But in the last generation, with the meeting of Eastern and Western healing practices, we have come to accept and understand that mind and body are powerfully related.

Between 1990 and 1997, the number of patients using alternative practices increased from 36 to 46%.1 Quality clinical research has grown steadily since 1970. The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), founded in 1998 as part of the National Institutes of Health, is now a vital organization for disseminating information and providing funding options for complementary or alternative medical research.

Mind-body interventions include relaxation, imagery, biofeedback, meditation, hypnosis, tai chi, yoga, and others. They often help patients experience healing for their illnesses in new and different ways.

A mind-body modality we often experience, many times unbeknownst to us, is the placebo response. It happens even without our planning or effort. In scientific studies, it has been shown to interfere with clinical outcomes. It is often looked upon as puzzling or confusing and unfortunately has thereby been undervalued.2 A positive placebo response typically improves a patient’s trust and hope for an affirmative outcome.

Mind-body therapies regard as essential an approach that acknowledges each person’s capacity for self-knowledge and self-care. It emphasizes the person’s openness to participate and his or her desire to succeed. It often has been said that mind-body medicine views illness not as an obstacle but as an opportunity for personal growth and transformation.

Further training of medical health professionals is needed to improve understanding of the benefits of the mind-body therapies. Likewise, practitioners of spirituality and mind-body interventions need to be more appreciative of the successes that the scientific practice of medicine has made available. Together, they can help augment clinical outcomes whenever possible.

Dean Ornish, MD, a cardiologist and founder of the Preventive Medicine Research Institute in Sausalito, Calif., has done just that. He showed that comprehensive lifestyle changes (low-fat vegetarian diet, smoking cessation, stress-management training, and moderate exercise) for patients with heart disease can actually reverse coronary heart disease.3 

Table 1 lists many of the mind-body therapies and offers a brief description of their potential physiological benefits.

How do these therapies work? What is the trigger? In many, if not all, methodologies, the basic dynamic feature is the “relaxation response.” Herbert Benson, MD, of the Mind-Body Medical Institute at Harvard University4 coined the phrase “relaxation response” after carrying out research on the effects of meditation in collaboration with national and international scholars. The relaxation response is a state in which the body slows down and heart rate, blood pressure, and breathing slow down, facilitating the uptake of oxygen. The body achieves a sleep-like rest (an altered state of consciousness) in a brief period of time.

Conversely, the stress response, or the “fight or flight” response, includes increased levels of heart rate, breathing, blood pressure, blood glucose, and stress hormones. Excess stress-induced levels of adrenaline or cortisol may damage the blood vessels and also compromise the immune system.5,6 

Keeping excess stress hormones in check with relaxation may help stabilize glucose levels and at the same time provide some protection for the heart.3 These are both very important issues for people with diabetes.

Mind-body therapies work for some people, but they may not work for everyone. Remember, we are dealing with two interdependent variables here, mind and body, which then have to interact with all the other bodily functions.

It is not easy to design research methodologies that produce significant outcomes in such challenging situations. Grant opportunities have been few compared to those available for drug research, reflecting the limited profit potential of complementary and alternative medicine research. The remainder of this article describes some of the therapies that have been researched and published in peer-reviewed journals. As expected, there are a variety of studies both with and without positive results regarding their effect on diabetes.

Feelings of stress raise blood glucose levels in people with diabetes. This is because of an increased production of stress hormones,7 which reduces insulin action. In addition, patients under perceived stress may find that caring for their diabetes is less of a priority, leading to poor glycemic control, which further exacerbates the situation.

It is therefore important for diabetes health professionals to be aware of and to check with their patients about how stress may be affecting their lives. Health care professionals can then offer advice specific to their patients’ situation. Perhaps some additional lifestyle changes could be recommended for stress reduction. As noted earlier, decreasing stress reactions may lead to better glucose control and improvement in immune system function.

Glucose management.

With increased glycemic control, there is always a risk for hypoglycemia. When in a relaxed state, the body metabolizes carbohydrate more efficiently, thereby lowering blood glucose levels.8,9 Patients with type 1 diabetes may potentially develop hypoglycemia following relaxation.9,10 Therefore, such patients should be told of the possibility for low blood glucose levels after relaxation and instructed to promptly treat it as directed by their health care professional.

In published, peer-reviewed research studies featuring diabetes and blood glucose, the most common alternative treatment is relaxation training or biofeedback-assisted relaxation training. Many case and controlled studies using biofeedback-assisted relaxation training with type 1 diabetic patients showed significantly lower average blood glucose levels in experimental groups or at post-test in the instance of case studies.1113 These differences could not be explained by increased insulin doses.11 It is suggested that stress management be considered as an adjunct to the medical management of people with type 1 diabetes.

In studies of patients with type 2 diabetes, no significant lowering of glycemic levels were observed at post-test.14,15 However, with relaxation training, patients may have experienced other benefits, such as increased self-management abilities, improved sense of well-being, increased coping skills, lowered incidence of depression, and less perceived stress. Some studies have not been designed to provide statistically significant results for more than one or two variables.

Depression.

Depression is a frequent comorbidity of chronic illness and diabetes.16 People with diabetes who suffer from depression or anxiety struggle more to control their blood glucose levels, even if they are taught biofeedback and relaxation techniques. A small, controlled study followed 18 insulin-dependent diabetic patients with depression.17 Four weeks after the treatment ended, researchers found little difference in the daily blood glucose measurements between patients who were taught to practice relaxation at home and those who were not. Depressed patients often have difficulty executing the self-care activities associated with diabetes. The additional demands of a relaxation treatment plan may have been similarly difficult to follow.

Blood circulation and healing.

The autonomic nervous system is composed of the sympathetic branch (active in response to stress), and the parasympathetic branch (active during relaxation and digestion). Relaxation, or self-regulation of the sympathetic nervous system activity, can be accomplished in various ways including hand- and foot-warming. In a general way, this may be thought of as quieting the emotions.

When relaxing, the sympathetic nervous system tone is lessened. Muscles relax—not only the large ones, but also the musculature surrounding the capillary blood vessels. This relaxation allows a reduction in blood pressure and improved perfusion to the peripheral blood vessels, thereby increasing blood flow to the extremities.18 With the improved blood flow comes increased oxygenation and nutrition of the tissues.

In the studies of Rice et al.,19,20 this hypothesis was proven valid. A within-subjects design study of 40 people with diabetes19 demonstrated that subjects responded positively to thermal biofeedback-assisted relaxation by increasing peripheral vasodilation. This increased blood flow by an average change score of 22.5% (blood volume pulse [BVP] measured with photoplethysmography). Change scores were expressed as a percentage of the optimal BVP change (100%) as follows for each participant: [(post-BVP score − pre-BVP score)/(100 − pre-BVP score)] × 100. Similarly, for the temperature change score, the optimal value used was 98.6° Fahrenheit. The average increased toe temperature change score was 31.4%, (P < 0.001).

A multi-center, controlled clinical trial of patients with chronic non-healing foot ulcers20 produced significant results in healing. Of participants in the experimental group who were taught thermal biofeedback-assisted relaxation (increased blood flow to the feet), 14 out of the 16 ulcers, or 87.5%, healed. In the control group, 7 out of 16 ulcers, or 43.75%, healed (P < 0.009).

Neuropathy pain.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy affects the sensory nerves in the feet with pain and, later, with loss of feeling. The additional oxygenation and available nutrients to the tissues following the effects of relaxation provide improved sensory function in the nerve fibers that correspond to touch.20 This was shown by measuring the Current Perception Threshold (CPT) levels by electrical stimulation of the great toe. The change in CPT levels pre- to post- intervention indicated a significant difference between the experimental and control groups. A significant improvement (increased sensation in the feet) was noted in the large myelinated nerve fiber functioning in the experimental groups, which used biofeedback-assisted relaxation, compared to the control groups who did not (P < 0.02).

In another study by Fiero et al.,21 it was suggested that diabetic neuropathy might interfere with the ability to self-regulate peripheral temperature and that assessing neuropathic status may be important before prescribing thermal biofeedback. On the other hand, in mind-body therapies, “thinking of warmth” may surpass or be more accurate than “feeling warmth.”

The beneficial effects of thermal biofeedback-assisted relaxation have been demonstrated for several additional vascular disorders, including hypertension,22 migraine,23 and Raynaud’s syndrome.24 

Claudication.

This is a disease process involving inadequate peripheral blood flow. Thermal biofeedback has been tested as a therapy to improve vascular flow and walking tolerance in patients with peripheral vascular disease.25 Improvements were seen in ankle-brachial index, walking distance, walking speed, and stair climbing. Thermal biofeedback provided an improved vascular and ambulatory function for a diabetic patient with claudication.25 

Another case study of a patient with diabetes reported that attacks of intermittent claudication were reduced to zero after 12 sessions of thermal biofeedback. The patient’s daily walking distance increased by about a mile over the course of the treatment.26 Thus, it appears that thermal biofeedback and autogenic training are potentially promising therapies for people with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease.

This modality has been used to help people with eating disorders and those in need of assistance with smoking cessation and other lifestyle changes.27 Adolescents with type 1 diabetes have been reported to have a nonadherence rate of ∼20% to diet, exercise, and other self-care behaviors.28 In a hypnosis study,28 six adolescents served as their own controls, and no changes were made in insulin, diet, or exercise for 6 months. Then hypnosis, administered individually, was added with all of the usual modalities for 6 months. Posttreatment tests showed that average HbA1c dropped from 13.2 to 9.7%, and average fasting blood glucose (FBG) dropped from 426 to 149 mg/dl.

In yoga, people with diabetes may have found an important “new” tool that is thousands of years old. Research has shown Hatha yoga (physical movements and postures) and meditation to be excellent examples of the mind-body connection at work. Yoga may provide real benefits in stabilizing blood glucose.29 If done properly, yoga also counts as an aerobic exercise.

Jain and associates30 studied the response patterns of people with type 2 diabetes to yoga therapy. Their study showed 70% of participants to have a fair to good response to yoga therapy. After 40 days of yoga, there was a significant reduction in hyperglycemia measured by FBG and oral glucose tolerance test. It has been suggested that yoga, a simple and economical therapy, might be considered a beneficial adjunctive and self-administered therapy to medical treatment.

Regular practice is the most important variable with all these mind-body therapies. They are all inherently noninvasive, inexpensive, and safe. Furthermore, many studies have noted that patients using them experience secondary benefits, such as an increased ability to cope with daily stressors, adherence to prescribed treatments, increased ambulation, and positive outlook on life.13,3134 

Educational interventions are different from drug therapy and other medical interventions in that patients must accept a much greater personal responsibility for the conduct and success of these treatments. Most of the mind-body therapies involve patient education, supervised practice, and regular practice at home.

Both educator and patient are the beneficiaries of the lifestyle changes and positive attitudes resulting from the mind-body interventions. In addition to providing the education and teaching the techniques, the therapist/educators serve as mentors and human connections to the modality, providing hope and encouragement for patients. Instruction and supervised practice of mind-body skills can be conducted individually or in group settings, which can provide the strength of community.35 

Diabetes educators and other health care professionals have been at the forefront of including proven mind-body therapies in their practices. Continuing education courses and certifications in mind-body interventions are available for health care professionals who want to become familiar with mind-body skills and learn how to instruct patients in these therapies. Table 2 offers a list of resources for reference and training.

Practitioners and providers who want to incorporate mind-body interventions may need to educate their hospital and clinic administrators about these therapies. They need to see and be convinced by positive results when mind-body therapies are used in clinical applications. These therapies could be made available to their patients. Mindfulness meditation36 as a form of stress management therapy has made inroads in many health systems.

For insurance companies, covering mind-body therapies can be financially beneficial because these therapies are cost-effective, nonpharmacological, noninvasive, and safe. Naparstek37 and Rice et al.20 have shown how relaxation and imagery have increased healing in clinical application. Educated clients become more prevention-oriented and stay healthier.

Birgitta I. Rice, MS, RPh, CHES, is an intervention specialist at The Epidemiology Clinical Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.

Table 1.

Overview of Mind-Body Interventions

Overview of Mind-Body Interventions
Overview of Mind-Body Interventions
Table 2.

Resources for Reference and Training in Mind-Body Interventions

Resources for Reference and Training in Mind-Body Interventions
Resources for Reference and Training in Mind-Body Interventions
1.
Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC: Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997.
JAMA
280
:
1569
–1575,
1998
2.
Harrington A: The Placebo Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1999
3.
Ornish D, Brown SE, Scherwitz LV, Billings JH, Armstrong WT, Ports TA, McLanahan SM, Kirkeelde RL, Brand RJ, Gould KL: Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease?
Lancet
336
:
129
–133,
1990
4.
Benson H: The Relaxation Response. Boston, Mass., Morrow, 1975
5.
Frichione GL, Stefano GB: The stress response and autoimmunnoregulation.
Adv Neuroimmunol
4
:
13
–27,
1994
6.
Kamei T, Toriumi Y, Kimura H, Ohno S, Kumano H, Kimura K: Decrease in serum cortisol during yoga exercise is correlated with alpha wave activation.
Perceptual Motor Skills
90
:
1027
–1032,
2000
7.
McEwen BS: Protective and damaging effects of stress mediation.
N Engl J Med
329
:
1246
–1253,
1998
8.
Curtis JD, Deter RA, Schindler JV, Zirkel J: Teaching Stress Management & Relaxation Skills: An Instructor’s Guide. La Crosse, Wisc., Coulee Press, 1985
9.
Guthrie D, Moeller T, Guthrie R: Biofeedback and its application to the stabilization of diabetes.
Am J Clin Biofeedback
2
:
82
–87,
1987
10.
McGrady A, Bailey BK, Good MP: Controlled study of biofeedback-assisted relaxation in type I diabetes.
Diabetes Care
5
:
360
–365,
1991
11.
Bailey BK, McGrady AV, Good M: Management of a patient with insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus learning biofeedback-assisted relaxation.
Diabetes Educ
16
:
201
–204,
1990
12.
McGrady A, Gerstenmaier L: Effect of biofeedback-assisted relaxation training on blood glucose levels in a type I insulin dependent diabetic: a case report.
J Behav Ther Exper Psychiatr
21
:
69
–75,
1990
13.
Cox DJ, Taylor AG, Holley-Wilcox P, Pohl SL, Guthrow E: The relationship between psychological stress and insulin-dependent diabetic blood-glucose control: preliminary investigations.
Health Psychol
3
:
63
–75,
1984
14.
Jablon SL, Naliboff BD, Gilmore SL, Rosenthal MJ: Effects of relaxation training on glucose tolerance and diabetic control in type II diabetes.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback
22
:
155
–169,
1997
15.
Lane JD, McCaskill CC, Ross SL, Feinglos MN, Surwit RS: Relaxation training for NIDDM: predicting who may benefit.
Diabetes Care
16
:
1087
–1094,
1993
16.
Stein M, Miller AH, Trestman RL: Depression, the immune system, and health and illness.
Arch Gen Psychiatr
48
:
171
–177,
1991
17.
McGrady A, Horner J: Role of mood in outcome of biofeedback assisted relaxation therapy in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback
24
:
79
–88,
1999
18.
Shulimson AD, Lawrence PF, Iacono CV: The effect of thermal biofeedback-mediated relaxation training on healing.
Biofeedback Self-Regulation
4
:
311
–319,
1986
19.
Rice BI, Schindler JV: Effect of thermal biofeedback-assisted relaxation training on blood circulation in the lower extremities of a population with diabetes.
Diabetes Care
15
:
853
–858,
1992
20.
Rice BI, Kalker AJ, Schindler JV, Dixon RM: Effect of biofeedback-assisted relaxation training on foot ulcer healing.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc
91
:
132
–141,
2001
21.
Fiero PL, Cox DJ, Fryberg DA, Turkheimer EN, Saunders JT, Philliips II LH: The influence of neuropathy on foot-warming acquisition via thermal biofeedback in diabetic outpatients. Diabetes Care. In press
22.
Fahrion S: Hypertension and biofeedback.
Primary Care
3
:
663
–682,
1991
23.
Blanchard EB, Appelbaum KA, Radnitz CL, Morrill B, Michultka D, Kirsch C, Guarnieri P, Hillhouse J, Evans DD, Jaccard J: A controlled evaluation of thermal biofeedback and thermal biofeedback combined with cognitive therapy in the treatment of vascular headache.
J Consult Clin Psychol
58
:
216
–224,
1990
24.
Crockett D, Bilsker D: Bringing the feet in from the cold: thermal biofeedback training of foot warming in Raynaud’s syndrome.
Biofeedback Self-Regulation
4
:
431
–438,
1984
25.
Aiken JE: Thermal biofeedback for claudication in diabetes: a literature review and case study.
Altern Med Rev
4
:
104
–110,
1999
26.
Saunders JT, Cox DJ, Teates CD, Pohl SL: Thermal biofeedback in the treatment of intermittent claudication in diabetes: a case study.
Biofeedback Self-Regulation
19
:
337
–345,
1994
27.
Watters KH: A holistic approach to meeting students’ needs: using hypnotherapy techniques to assist students in managing their health.
J School Nurs
14
:
44
–48,
1998
28.
Ratner H, Gross L, Casas J, Castells S: A hypnotherapeutic approach to the improvement of compliance in adolescent diabetics.
Am J Clin Hypnosis
32
:
154
–159,
1990
29.
Gimbel MA: Yoga, meditation, and imagery: clinical applications.
Nurse Pract Forum
9
:
243
–255,
1998
30.
Jain SC, Uppal A, Bhatnagar SO, Talukdar B: A study of response pattern of non-insulin dependent diabetics to yoga therapy.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
19
:
69
–74,
1993
31.
Aikens JE, Wallander JL, Bell DS, Cole JA: Daily stress variability, learned resourcefulness, regimen adherence and metabolic control in type I diabetes mellitus: evaluation of a path model.
J Consult Clin Psychol
60
:
113
–118,
1992
32.
Rosenbaum L: Biofeedback-assisted stress management for insulin-treated diabetes mellitus.
Biofeedback Self-Regulation
4
:
519
–531,
1983
33.
Surwit RS, Ross SL, Feinglos MN: Stress, behavior, and the autonomic nervous system in type II diabetes mellitus. In Neuropsychological and Behavioral Aspects of Diabetes. Holmes CS, Ed. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1990, p. 184–197
34.
Stein M, Miller AH, Trestman RL: Depression, the immune system, and health and illness.
Arch Gen Psychiatr
48
:
171
–177,
1991
35.
Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Jalom I: Support for patients with metastatic cancer: a randomized outcome study.
Arch Gen Psychiatr
38
:
527
–533,
1981
36.
Kabat-Zinn J, Wheeler E, Light T, Skillings A, Scharf MJ, Cropley TG, Hosmer D, Bernhard JD: Influence of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction intervention on rates of skin clearing in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.
Psychosom Med
60
:
625
–632,
1998
37.
Naparstek B: The value of tapes for surgery (Letter).
Adv Mind-Body Med
15
:
157
–158,
1999