In Brief

Hyperglycemia in diabetes is known to be associated with both micro- and macrovascular complications. However, multiple studies have raised the question of whether variation in glucose levels, in addition to average glucose, might be a risk factor for these complications. This article summarizes the available data on glycemic variability and how they might contribute to complications in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Hyperglycemia in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes is associated with diabetes complications, including retinopathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Clinicians typically gauge glycemic control with A1C, which reflects the average glucose level over the previous 2–3 months. However, a number of studies14  have questioned whether, in addition to average glucose, glucose variability could be an independent risk factor for diabetes complications.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)5  studied the effect of intensive versus conventional insulin therapy on the occurrence and progression of microvascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes. The results showed a 50% relative risk reduction in retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in the intensively treated group, which could largely be explained by improvements in A1C. However, when patients from different treatment groups at the same A1C level were compared, those in the conventional group had higher rates of complications, suggesting that factors other than the average blood glucose level were contributing to the risk of complications.6  Subsequent analysis of the DCCT data found this initial finding to be erroneous, and reanalysis found 96% of the treatment group effect was in fact due to A1C.7  However, the authors concluded that total glycemic exposure, a composite of A1C and duration of diabetes, only accounted for 11% of the difference in retinopathy risk for the entire cohort. Thus, factors other than average blood glucose may contribute to the development of diabetes complications.

Patients with similar A1C values can have dramatically different glucose profiles. Some patients have minimal glucose excursions, with little variation from preprandial to postprandial glucose levels and rare hypoglycemia. Other patients have widely fluctuating glucose levels, with frequent episodes of hypoglycemia and marked postprandial increases in blood glucose.

These changes in blood glucose over time reflect glucose variability. Glucose variability can be described as within-day variability, with differences between fasting and postprandial blood glucose values throughout 24 hours, and between-day variability, reflecting differences in blood glucose control from day to day. This glucose variability is not reflected in A1C and thus may represent an additional risk factor for the development of diabetes complications.

Because A1C reflects average glucose level but not variability, measuring glucose variability requires other methods for analysis. A number of measurements have been developed for clinical use. The most practical for outpatient use is the standard deviation (SD) calculated from self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values. This can be calculated from patients' blood glucose meter downloads and provides a measure of glucose variability over a certain period of time, typically 1–3 months. The software can also provide information about the SD of fasting and postprandial glucose values.

More frequent glucose trends are available with the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices. With more data points, it is possible to calculate the mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE), which is a measure of within-day glucose variability. MAGE reflects the average difference between consecutive blood glucose values that are more than 1 SD from the daily mean. For between-day variability, the mean of daily differences (MODD), which is the average of the difference between blood glucose values measured at the same time on consecutive days, can be used (Table 1).8  There is a high degree of correlation with SD and both MAGE and MODD.9  Whichever method is most convenient for patients and providers can reasonably be used to measure glucose variability.

There remains some controversy as to how glucose variability could contribute to diabetes complications. Multiple in vitro studies with human cell lines have shown that intermittent high glucose levels induce more oxidative stress than continuous high glucose.1  Animal studies have confirmed these studies, showing greater impairment in endothelial function for untreated diabetic rats (continuous high glucose) versus rats having intermittent insulin treatment (variable glycemia).10  Human studies, however, are less clear, with some researchers finding a correlation between oxidative stress and glucose variability,11,12  but others failing to confirm these findings.1,13 

Although in vitro data support the oxidative stress theory, in vivo studies leave some uncertainty about how glycemic variability can contribute to diabetes complications. However, multiple studies do support the idea that variations in glucose levels are an important factor in the development of diabetes complications.4 

Using different methods for analyzing glucose variability, there is some support for a correlation between glucose variability and diabetes complications in patients with type 1 diabetes. Multiple analyses of the DCCT data have used the seven-point daily glucose profiles to measure within-day glucose variability using SD and MAGE.14,15  They found no relationship between glucose variability and microvascular complications during the initial DCCT or during 4 years of follow-up.16  However, in this same population, when glucose variability was measured as the SD of A1C during the 9-year follow-up period, there was a significant relationship with the development of both retinopathy and nephropathy.17  This suggests that long-term glucose variability, over months to years, may be a more important risk for development of microvascular complications than blood glucose variability within a given day.

The relationship between glucose variability and neuropathy has also been looked at by several groups. Analysis of the DCCT dataset found no relationship between same-day glucose variability and neuropathy, whether measured by MAGE or SD.18  Another small study of patients with neuropathy19  similarly did not find an association between MAGE and onset or progression of neuropathy. However, patients who suffered from painful neuropathy had more frequent glucose excursions, suggesting a relationship between glycemic variability and pain symptoms. In a separate study looking at long-term glucose variability reported as the SD of 4-week blood glucose data,20  glucose variability was predictive of the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy during 11 years of follow-up. There was no relationship with retinopathy or nephropathy. These studies again suggest that it is not the glucose variability in a given day, but rather variability over time that is a risk factor for microvascular and neuropathic complications of diabetes.

Although there have been many studies looking at microvascular complications and glucose variability in patients with type 1 diabetes, there are few data to suggest a relationship between glucose variability and CVD in these patients. Analysis of the DCCT data showed no relationship between within-day glucose variation and cardiovascular events.21  Another study22  found no relationship between within-day glucose variability and arterial stiffness, a marker for cardiovascular risk. A third study23  looked at coronary calcium scores as a marker for CVD. The researchers found glucose variability over 3–5 days of CGM, measured by SD, was positively associated with coronary artery calcium score in men with type 1 diabetes. There was no association for women. More research is needed to clarify the relationship between glucose variability in type 1 diabetes and CVD.

Among patients with type 2 diabetes, there is more evidence to support a relationship between both fasting and postprandial glucose variability and cardiovascular risk. In a study of 300 patients with type 2 diabetes who presented with chest pain,24  within-day glucose variability was associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Postprandial glucose excursions have been found to be associated with increased carotid intima media thickness (CIMT),25  as well as cardiovascular events.26  Variability of fasting plasma glucose in elderly patients (> 75 years of age) with type 2 diabetes was linked to an increase in overall mortality and specifically predicted cardiovascular death.27,28  A similar analysis of younger patients, aged 56–74 years, found that variability of fasting glucose was an independent predictor of total and cardiovascular mortality during the subsequent 10 years among this population with type 2 diabetes.29  Together, these studies suggest that glycemic variability is an independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, but the mechanism remains unclear.

Table 1.

Measurement of Glycemic Variability

Measurement of Glycemic Variability
Measurement of Glycemic Variability

With respect to microvascular complications and type 2 diabetes, there are conflicting results regarding the relationship to glucose variability. One study found that fasting glucose variability did predict the development of retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes during 5 years of follow-up.30  A second group, looking at development of retinopathy during 30–40 years of follow-up, confirmed the relationship between fasting glucose variability and both nonproliferative and proliferative retinopathy.31,32  A third group, however, found that only the magnitude of hyperglycemia, and not variability, predicted the development or progression of retinopathy during the subsequent 4 years.33  This study, however, looked at an elderly population with an average duration of diabetes of 20 years during 4 years of follow-up, whereas the previous studies included younger patients with shorter durations of diabetes, making it difficult to compare the results of the different studies. The effects of glucose variability on nephropathy and neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes are not well described.

Although there have not been any interventional studies looking at the effects of decreasing glucose variability on outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes, there have been several studies looking at cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. A meta-analysis34  of seven studies looking at the effects of acarbose, which decreases postprandial glucose excursions, on cardiovascular outcomes found a significant decrease in the incidence of myocardial infarction with a minimum of 52 weeks of acarbose treatment (range 52–164 weeks). Another study35  using repaglinide to decrease postprandial glucose versus glyburide, which decreases fasting plasma glucose, showed a decrease in CIMT in the repaglinide group, despite similar improvements in A1C in both groups. Yet another study36  failed to find an effect of postprandial versus fasting glycemia targets in preventing CVD, but this study failed to achieve its specified blood glucose targets or event rate, so it may not have been properly powered to detect a difference. Larger clinical studies are needed to determine whether decreasing glucose variability will improve clinical outcomes.

In addition to the micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes, glycemic variability may also affect psychological outcomes. One small study37  of patients with type 1 diabetes found high glucose values (> 180 mg/dl) to be associated with negative mood ratings, including tension, anhedonia, and decreased arousal, although no association was seen with between-day glucose variability. Another study38  of 60 patients with type 2 diabetes found that negative mood (depression, anxiety) and cognitive symptoms (difficulty concentrating, slowed thinking) were associated with a change in blood glucose after a meal, suggesting that within-day glucose variability can negatively affect an individual's mood and psychological well-being.

Within-day glucose variability is also tied to hypoglycemia in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.39,40  This includes asymptomatic hypoglycemia,41  which can have a significant impact on a patient's daily life. These studies suggest that glycemic variability not only has the potential to affect long-term vascular complications, but also can affect quality of life on a day-to-day basis.

A1C testing remains the standard of care for managing diabetes, but there is growing evidence that A1C does not reflect the complete picture. Glycemic variability is another factor that likely contributes to complications of diabetes, including negative effects on mood and cognition, as well as the risk of hypoglycemia. Although there are not yet enough data to offer guidelines for glycemic variability, a good rule of thumb is an SD that is less than half of the average blood glucose level. At this level, both hyper- and hypoglycemia are minimized. It remains unclear whether interventions to decrease glycemic variability lead to improved outcomes, but clinicians should be aware of glycemic variability in managing their patients. It is important to recognize that despite having a “normal” A1C, patients may not have optimal control of their diabetes, as illustrated by the following case.

You receive your “report card” from an oversight insurance management agency group. The report includes your patient A, a 56-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes with an A1C of 7.2%. The report also includes patient B, a 56-year-old woman with an A1C of 6.6%. Patient A has an average glucose on glucose meter download of 150 mg/dl over the past month, with an SD of 36 mg/dl. Patient B also has an average glucose on the past month's download of 150 mg/dl, but her SD is 100 mg/dl. Her family calls you almost monthly to report an incident of hypoglycemia requiring assistance and to say they are quite concerned about leaving her alone at any time of the day because she is unable to feel symptoms of hypoglycemia. The oversight insurance company commends you on the A1C of 6.6%, but urges you to be more aggressive with your patient with the A1C of 7.2%.

Which patient has the better glucose control? And which patient might have fewer glycemic sequellae? Which patient is likely to have less hypoglycemia and to feel better?

In patient B, with the lower A1C of 6.6%, the blood glucose meter download shows a considerable amount of glucose variability, with a high SD. This suggests an extensive glucose range, with frequent hypoglycemia and episodes of hyperglycemia. The patient reports fatigue and depression, and her family expresses concerns about her safety. In addition, patient B may be at greater risk for cardiovascular mortality related to glycemic variability, despite having the lower A1C.

Patient A has an A1C higher than the “ideal” A1C target. However, her glycemic variability is much less than for patient B. She has infrequent hypoglycemia, which is easily recognized and treated. Her quality of life is less affected by her diabetes, and she is less likely to suffer long-term complications. Despite having the lower A1C, patient A is suffering more adverse effects from her diabetes, in large part because of her increased glycemic variability.

Although A1C is the current standard for defining optimal glycemic control, it is clear that not all A1Cs are equal. Glycemic variability is another factor clinicians should consider when managing patients' diabetes because it could affect not only cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes, but perhaps more importantly for patients, quality of life.

1.
Siegelaar
SE
,
Holleman
F
,
Hoekstra
JB
,
DeVries
JH
:
Glucose variability; does it matter?
Endocr Rev
31
:
171
182
,
2010
2.
Kilpatrick
ES
:
Arguments for and against the role of glucose variability in the development of diabetes complications
.
J Diabetes Sci Technol
3
:
649
655
,
2009
3.
Kilpatrick
ES
,
Rigby
AS
,
Atkin
SL
:
For debate: glucose variability and diabetes complication risk: we need to know the answer
.
Diabet Med
27
:
868
871
,
2010
4.
Nalysnyk
L
,
Hernandez-Medina
M
,
Krishnarajah
G
:
Glycaemic variability and complications in patients with diabetes mellitus: evidence from a systematic review of the literature
.
Diabetes Obes Metab
12
:
288
298
,
2010
5.
DCCT Research Group
:
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
.
N Engl J Med
329
:
977
986
,
1993
6.
DCCT Research Group
:
The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
.
Diabetes
44
:
968
983
,
1995
7.
Lachin
JM
,
Genuth
S
,
Nathan
DM
,
Zinman
B
,
Rutledge
BN
,
Group
DER
:
Effect of glycemic exposure on the risk of microvascular complications in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial—revisited
.
Diabetes
57
:
995
1001
,
2008
8.
Monnier
L
,
Colette
C
,
Owens
DR
:
Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it?
J Diabetes Sci Technol
2
:
1094
1100
,
2008
9.
Rodbard
D
:
Glycemic variability: measurement and utility in clinical medicine and research—one viewpoint
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
13
:
1077
1080
,
2011
10.
Horvath
EM
,
Benko
R
,
Kiss
L
,
Muranyi
M
,
Pek
T
,
Fekete
K
,
Barany
T
,
Somlai
A
,
Csordas
A
,
Szabo
C
:
Rapid ‘glycaemic swings’ induce nitrosative stress, activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and impair endothelial function in a rat model of diabetes mellitus
.
Diabetologia
52
:
952
961
,
2009
11.
Monnier
L
,
Mas
E
,
Ginet
C
,
Michel
F
,
Villon
L
,
Cristol
JP
,
Colette
C
:
Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes
.
JAMA
295
:
1681
1687
,
2006
12.
Ceriello
A
,
Esposito
K
,
Piconi
L
,
Ihnat
MA
,
Thorpe
JE
,
Testa
R
,
Boemi
M
,
Giugliano
D
:
Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients
.
Diabetes
57
:
1349
1354
,
2008
13.
Wentholt
IM
,
Kulik
W
,
Michels
RP
,
Hoekstra
JB
,
DeVries
JH
:
Glucose fluctuations and activation of oxidative stress in patients with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetologia
51
:
183
190
,
2008
14.
Kilpatrick
ES
,
Rigby
AS
,
Atkin
SL
:
The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
29
:
1486
1490
,
2006
15.
Service
FJ
,
O'Brien
PC
:
The relation of glycaemia to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetic Control and Complications Trial
.
Diabetologia
44
:
1215
1220
,
2001
16.
Kilpatrick
ES
,
Rigby
AS
,
Atkin
SL
:
Effect of glucose variability on the long-term risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
32
:
1901
1903
,
2009
17.
Kilpatrick
ES
,
Rigby
AS
,
Atkin
SL
:
A1C variability and the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
.
Diabetes Care
31
:
2198
2202
,
2008
18.
Siegelaar
SE
,
Kilpatrick
ES
,
Rigby
AS
,
Atkin
SL
,
Hoekstra
JB
,
Devries
JH
:
Glucose variability does not contribute to the development of peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes: data from the DCCT
.
Diabetologia
52
:
2229
2232
,
2009
19.
Oyibo
SO
,
Prasad
YD
,
Jackson
NJ
,
Jude
EB
,
Boulton
AJ
:
The relationship between blood glucose excursions and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a pilot study
.
Diabet Med
19
:
870
873
,
2002
20.
Bragd
J
,
Adamson
U
,
Backlund
LB
,
Lins
PE
,
Moberg
E
,
Oskarsson
P
:
Can glycaemic variability, as calculated from blood glucose self-monitoring, predict the development of complications in type 1 diabetes over a decade?
Diabetes Metab
34
:
612
616
,
2008
21.
Kilpatrick
ES
,
Rigby
AS
,
Atkin
SL
:
Mean blood glucose compared with HbA1c in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetologia
51
:
365
371
,
2008
22.
Gordin
D
,
Ronnback
M
,
Forsblom
C
,
Makinen
V
,
Saraheimo
M
,
Groop
PH
:
Glucose variability, blood pressure and arterial stiffness in type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
80
:
e4
e7
,
2008
23.
Snell-Bergeon
JK
,
Roman
R
,
Rodbard
D
,
Garg
S
,
Maahs
DM
,
Schauer
IE
,
Bergman
BC
,
Kinney
GL
,
Rewers
M
:
Glycaemic variability is associated with coronary artery calcium in men with type 1 diabetes: the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes study
.
Diabet Med
27
:
1436
1442
,
2010
24.
Su
G
,
Mi
S
,
Tao
H
,
Li
Z
,
Yang
H
,
Zheng
H
,
Zhou
Y
,
Ma
C
:
Association of glycemic variability and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes [article online]
.
Cardiovasc Diabetol
10
:
19
,
2011
. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056765/?tool=pubmed
25.
Esposito
K
,
Ciotola
M
,
Carleo
D
,
Schisano
B
,
Sardelli
L
,
Di Tommaso
D
,
Misso
L
,
Saccomanno
F
,
Ceriello
A
,
Giugliano
D
:
Post-meal glucose peaks at home associate with carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
93
:
1345
1350
,
2008
26.
Cavalot
F
,
Petrelli
A
,
Traversa
M
,
Bonomo
K
,
Fiora
E
,
Conti
M
,
Anfossi
G
,
Costa
G
,
Trovati
M
:
Postprandial blood glucose is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly in women: lessons from the San Luigi Gonzaga Diabetes Study
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
91
:
813
819
,
2006
27.
Muggeo
M
,
Verlato
G
,
Bonora
E
,
Ciani
F
,
Moghetti
P
,
Eastman
R
,
Crepaldi
G
,
de Marco
R
:
Long-term instability of fasting plasma glucose predicts mortality in elderly NIDDM patients: the Verona Diabetes Study
.
Diabetologia
38
:
672
679
,
1995
28.
Muggeo
M
,
Verlato
G
,
Bonora
E
,
Zoppini
G
,
Corbellini
M
,
de Marco
R
:
Long-term instability of fasting plasma glucose, a novel predictor of cardiovascular mortality in elderly patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Verona Diabetes Study
.
Circulation
96
:
1750
1754
,
1997
29.
Muggeo
M
,
Zoppini
G
,
Bonora
E
,
Brun
E
,
Bonadonna
RC
,
Moghetti
P
,
Verlato
G
:
Fasting plasma glucose variability predicts 10-year survival of type 2 diabetic patients: the Verona Diabetes Study
.
Diabetes Care
23
:
45
50
,
2000
30.
Gimeno-Orna
JA
,
Castro-Alonso
FJ
,
Boned-Juliani
B
,
Lou-Arnal
LM
:
Fasting plasma glucose variability as a risk factor of retinopathy in Type 2 diabetic patients
.
J Diabetes Complications
17
:
78
81
,
2003
31.
Takao
T
,
Ide
T
,
Yanagisawa
H
,
Kikuchi
M
,
Kawazu
S
,
Matsuyama
Y
:
The effect of fasting plasma glucose variability on the risk of retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients: retrospective long-term follow-up
.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
89
:
296
302
,
2010
32.
Takao
T
,
Ide
T
,
Yanagisawa
H
,
Kikuchi
M
,
Kawazu
S
,
Matsuyama
Y
:
The effects of fasting plasma glucose variability and time-dependent glycemic control on the long-term risk of retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients
.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
91
:
e40
e42
,
2011
33.
Zoppini
G
,
Verlato
G
,
Targher
G
,
Casati
S
,
Gusson
E
,
Biasi
V
,
Perrone
F
,
Bonora
E
,
Muggeo
M
:
Is fasting glucose variability a risk factor for retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes?
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
19
:
334
339
,
2009
34.
Hanefeld
M
,
Cagatay
M
,
Petrowitsch
T
,
Neuser
D
,
Petzinna
D
,
Rupp
M
:
Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis of seven long-term studies
.
Eur Heart J
25
:
10
16
,
2004
35.
Esposito
K
,
Giugliano
D
,
Nappo
F
,
Marfella
R
Campanian Postprandial Hyperglycemia Study Group
:
Regression of carotid atherosclerosis by control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus
.
Circulation
110
:
214
219
,
2004
36.
Raz
I
,
Wilson
PW
,
Strojek
K
,
Kowalska
I
,
Bozikov
V
,
Gitt
AK
,
Jermendy
G
,
Campaigne
BN
,
Kerr
L
,
Milicevic
Z
,
Jacober
SJ
:
Effects of prandial versus fasting glycemia on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the HEART2D trial
.
Diabetes Care
32
:
381
386
,
2009
37.
Hermanns
N
,
Scheff
C
,
Kulzer
B
,
Weyers
P
,
Pauli
P
,
Kubiak
T
,
Haak
T
:
Association of glucose levels and glucose variability with mood in type 1 diabetic patients
.
Diabetologia
50
:
930
933
,
2007
38.
Cox
DJ
,
McCall
A
,
Kovatchev
B
,
Sarwat
S
,
Ilag
LL
,
Tan
MH
:
Effects of blood glucose rate of changes on perceived mood and cognitive symptoms in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
30
:
2001
2002
,
2007
39.
Niskanen
L
,
Virkamaki
A
,
Hansen
JB
,
Saukkonen
T
:
Fasting plasma glucose variability as a marker of nocturnal hypoglycemia in diabetes: evidence from the PREDICTIVE study
.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
86
:
e15
e18
,
2009
40.
Kilpatrick
ES
,
Rigby
AS
,
Goode
K
,
Atkin
SL
:
Relating mean blood glucose and glucose variability to the risk of multiple episodes of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes
.
Diabetologia
50
:
2553
2561
,
2007
41.
Monnier
L
,
Wojtusciszyn
A
,
Colette
C
,
Owens
D
:
The contribution of glucose variability to asymptomatic hypoglycemia in persons with type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
13
:
813
818
,
2011