IN BRIEF The introduction of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) several years ago enabled researchers to investigate the impact of exercise strategies on 24-hour glycemic control. Such unique information on the glucoregulatory properties of exercise will ultimately lead to more effective exercise programs to prevent and treat type 2 diabetes. This article reviews the role of exercise and physical activity in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, complemented by recent data obtained by CGM.

Although exercise is an important treatment strategy to improve long-term glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes, the impact of exercise on 24-hour glycemic control has remained largely unexplored. The introduction of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) several years ago enabled researchers to investigate the impact of exercise strategies on 24-hour glycemic control. Such unique information on the glucoregulatory properties of exercise will ultimately lead to more effective exercise intervention programs to prevent and treat type 2 diabetes. This article reviews the role of exercise and physical activity in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, complemented by recent data obtained by CGM. Based on current evidence, practical implications for the prescription of exercise in the treatment of type 2 diabetes are discussed.

The quality of glycemic control is generally assessed on the basis of patients’ A1C values (1). This key therapeutic value reflects average blood glucose concentrations experienced during the preceding 2–3 months (2) and can therefore be considered as a measure of long-term glycemic control. The importance of A1C as a measure of long-term glycemic control is illustrated by its strong relationship with diabetes complications (3). For this reason, it is not surprising that blood glucose management is generally focused on lowering A1C values.

Nevertheless, because A1C reflects average blood glucose concentrations over a prolonged period of time, it does not provide much information on the prevalence and amplitude of hyperglycemic blood glucose excursions experienced throughout the day. Such information is highly relevant because acute hyperglycemic episodes have been associated with the development of diabetes complications independent from patients’ fasting blood glucose or A1C levels (412). In addition, the level of glycemic variability, which reflects the frequency and amplitude of upward and downward blood glucose excursions throughout the day, has recently been implicated in the development of diabetes complications (1315). Although glycemic control is often well characterized according to patients’ A1C values, detailed insight into blood glucose excursions throughout the day is limited.

The introduction of noninvasive, ambulatory CGM devices ∼15 years ago enabled the assessment of blood glucose concentrations throughout the day. Initial studies applying the CGM technique indicated that patients with type 2 diabetes with clinically acceptable A1C values may still experience excessive blood glucose excursions (1618). In accordance, we found that patients with type 2 diabetes spend a large part of the day with blood glucose concentrations well above the acceptable upper limit (180 mg/dL) as defined by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (19) (Figure 1). Such excess hyperglycemia was even observed in type 2 diabetic patients with an A1C level well below the treatment target of 7%. In fact, patients with an A1C <7% experienced hyperglycemia for as much as 24 ± 5% of the time.

FIGURE 1.

Average glucose concentrations over time in people with type 2 diabetes (n = 60; average 24-hour glucose concentration 171 ± 5 mg/dL) and healthy, normoglycemic, control subjects (n = 24; average 24-hour glucose concentration 113 ± 4 mg/dL) under standardized dietary, but otherwise free-living, conditions. The upper and lower margins of the 95% CI are indicated by the grey areas. Consumption of the main meals is indicated by the vertical dashed lines. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 19.

FIGURE 1.

Average glucose concentrations over time in people with type 2 diabetes (n = 60; average 24-hour glucose concentration 171 ± 5 mg/dL) and healthy, normoglycemic, control subjects (n = 24; average 24-hour glucose concentration 113 ± 4 mg/dL) under standardized dietary, but otherwise free-living, conditions. The upper and lower margins of the 95% CI are indicated by the grey areas. Consumption of the main meals is indicated by the vertical dashed lines. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 19.

Close modal

These findings indicate that A1C values in the acceptable range do not guarantee blood glucose concentrations in the acceptable range. Therefore, treatment strategies should focus not only on lowering A1C levels, but also, more specifically, on controlling postprandial blood glucose excursions. Moreover, because postprandial hyperglycemia substantially contributes to the glycation of hemoglobin (i.e., A1C) (20,21), reducing postprandial hyperglycemia also promotes the achievement of desirable A1C levels (22).

The effect of structured exercise training on long-term glycemic control (i.e., A1C) has been extensively investigated. Recent meta-analyses indicate that the average reduction in A1C after long-term endurance or resistance exercise training can be as much as 0.5–0.8% (2326). The benefits of exercise for glycemic control are largely explained by an increase in whole-body insulin sensitivity. It should be noted, however, that the effect of exercise training on insulin sensitivity is lost 5–10 days after cessation of exercise training (2731). Therefore, it seems that the long-term effects of regular exercise on glycemic control (e.g., A1C) are attributed to the cumulative effect of transient improvements in insulin sensitivity and glycemic control after each successive bout of exercise, rather than to structural adaptations in insulin sensitivity (30,32,33). This is the reason why patients with type 2 diabetes need to exercise on a regular basis to achieve a sustained beneficial effect on blood glucose homeostasis. Moreover, this concept also emphasizes that the glucoregulatory properties of each individual exercise session are of key importance to achieving proper long-term glycemic control.

Before the introduction of the CGM technique, the acute and short-term effects of exercise could only be monitored in a laboratory setting by means of frequent blood sampling. Although interesting, laboratory-based experiments do not provide an answer to the question of whether exercise reduces blood glucose excursions in a real-life setting. For this reason, researchers started using blinded CGM to investigate the impact of acute exercise on 24-hour glycemic control under free-living conditions.

Recently, we investigated the impact of a single bout of moderate-intensity endurance exercise on 24-hour glycemic control in a large group of type 2 diabetic patients treated either with oral blood glucose–lowering medication or exogenous insulin (34). The exercise session was shown to reduce average glucose concentrations by ∼16 mg/dL over the 24-hour period after exercise, along with a 30% reduction in the time spent in hyperglycemia (blood glucose >180 mg/dL). Exercise also lowered glycemic variability throughout the day, indicating a decline in the frequency and/or amplitude of glucose fluctuations. These results obtained by CGM clearly show the benefits of exercise for 24-hour blood glucose homeostasis.

Given the unique information on daily blood glucose homeostasis provided by CGM, this method has become increasingly popular as a means to investigate the impact of exercise strategies on 24-hour glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Interestingly, a study by Mikus et al. (35) showed that short-term (7 consecutive days) exercise training improves 24-hour glycemic control under free-living conditions, whereas the same intervention did not significantly lower patients’ plasma glucose response to an oral glucose tolerance test (35). In addition, a recent meta-analysis of CGM studies indicated that exercise reduces postprandial blood glucose concentrations, whereas no effect was seen on fasting blood glucose concentrations (36). These findings support the view that the application of CGM under free-living conditions represents a more appropriate method to assess the impact of various treatment strategies on glycemic control than the standard laboratory-based blood glucose measurements. Another advantage of the CGM technique is that the intervention or monitoring periods can be kept relatively short. This allows for crossover intervention studies with the possibility to standardize or control for patients’ medication, diet, and physical activity patterns. Consequently, the impact of exercise on glycemic control can be assessed without interference caused by long-term or acute changes in medication, diet, and habitual physical activity. It is important to note that the test-retest reliability of CGM has proven to be high under such standardized conditions (37).

In the past few years, the use of CGM in life sciences research has provided incremental knowledge on the effects of various exercise strategies on glycemic control. In the following sections, we will elaborate on the glucoregulatory properties of the main exercise characteristics, with special attention to the novel information provided by CGM.

One of the main questions regarding exercise programs for patients with type 2 diabetes concerns the type of exercise that should be performed to optimize glycemic control. From a traditional perspective, the focus of exercise guidelines for type 2 diabetes has mainly been on the application of endurance exercise as the preferred exercise mode. This is likely attributed to the fact that most early exercise intervention studies applied endurance exercise (i.e., aerobic exercise) as a tool to improve insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance.

In the past decade, however, resistance exercise (i.e., weight lifting) also has been associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance (3841). Results obtained in large exercise intervention studies (42,43) and recent meta-analyses (24,26) indicate that the impact of resistance exercise on long-term glycemic control (i.e., A1C) is comparable to the impact of endurance exercise. Data obtained by CGM provides further support for the implementation of resistance exercise in exercise programs for patients with type 2 diabetes. Both resistance and endurance exercise were associated with a >30% decline in the prevalence of hyperglycemia over the 24-hour period after exercise (44). The benefits of both exercise modes for 24-hour glycemic control were observed not only in type 2 diabetic patients treated with oral glucose-lowering medication, but also in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Even individuals with prediabetes (i.e., impaired glucose tolerance) experienced substantial improvements in 24-hour glycemic control after resistance and endurance exercise (44). This suggests that endurance exercise sessions can be exchanged for resistance exercise sessions and vice versa without compromising the benefits of regular exercise for glycemic control.

Practical Implications

Given the equal benefits of resistance and endurance exercise for long-term and 24-hour glycemic control, both exercise modes can be used in exercise programs to prevent or treat type 2 diabetes. This knowledge can be used to tailor exercise programs to individual patients’ preferences and functional abilities. For example, resistance exercise might represent an attractive exercise mode for patients suffering from muscle weakness, cardiovascular complications, polyneuropathy, and reduced exercise tolerance, which generally reduce the feasibility of performing a strict endurance exercise regimen. Moreover, because type 2 diabetes is associated with an accelerated loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and functional capacity (45,46), it can be recommended to include at least two resistance exercise sessions per week in patients’ exercise routine. For relatively healthy patients with no functional decline who are suffering from excess adiposity, endurance exercise likely remains the predominant type of exercise preferred to optimize fat loss. Resistance exercise is then required to help maintain fat-free mass while conforming to an energy-restrictive diet combined with endurance exercise training.

The efficacy of exercise to improve glycemic control largely can be attributed to the characteristics of the applied exercise program, including exercise intensity, exercise duration, and exercise frequency (33). The product of the main exercise characteristics (exercise duration × exercise intensity × exercise frequency) allows for an estimate of the exercise volume (or exercise dose), which can be regarded as the total amount of exercise performed within a certain period of time. The exercise volume can be expressed in different ways, such as the weekly amount of calories spent performing exercise, the metabolic equivalents accumulated over a week, or the total distance covered through walking, running, or cycling.

It is currently unclear whether the volume of endurance exercise ultimately drives the improvements in glycemic control, or whether the different characteristics of exercise (type, frequency, duration, and intensity) further modulate the impact of exercise on glycemic control.

Exercise Intensity Versus Exercise Duration

The intensity of an exercise routine is often viewed as a main determinant of subsequent improvements in glycemic control (33,4749). Given the proposed relationship between the degree of glycogen depletion and subsequent improvements in insulin sensitivity (32,50), many exercise guidelines advocate endurance exercise at vigorous intensities to maximize endogenous glycogen use and increase the impact of exercise on glycemic control (47,49).

Although some studies have found superior benefits of high-intensity as opposed to moderate-intensity endurance-type exercise on insulin sensitivity (51,52), others have found that the volume of exercise training, rather than exercise intensity per se, is of prime importance with respect to the increase in insulin sensitivity (53,54). Studies that controlled for the volume of exercise (i.e., lower intensity compensated by a longer duration) found no surplus benefit of high-intensity as opposed to moderate-intensity exercise training for A1C levels (55,56).

Comparable findings were obtained by the use of CGM in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sixty minutes of low-intensity cycling (35% maximal workload) appeared to be at least as effective in reducing the prevalence of hyperglycemia throughout the day as a volume-matched bout of high-intensity cycling (30 minutes at 70% maximal workload) (57). This finding seems to agree with the comparable improvements in insulin sensitivity observed the day after performing low- to moderate-intensity as opposed to moderate- to high-intensity endurance exercise (58). Thus, most of the currently available evidence indicates that high-intensity exercise is not required to improve insulin sensitivity or glycemic control.

Exercise Frequency

The frequency at which exercise is being performed represents another important factor that may modulate the impact of exercise on glycemic control. Because the impact of each exercise bout on blood glucose homeostasis may last for up to 48–72 hours (5961), exercise guidelines for type 2 diabetes generally state that exercise should be performed at least 3 days/week, with no more than two consecutive days between exercise bouts (47,49). However, it has been speculated that greater benefits for glycemic control could be achieved by performing exercise sessions more frequently. This view is supported by a recent meta-regression analysis showing that a higher frequency of exercise sessions is associated with greater benefits for glycemic control (62). This finding is not surprising because a higher frequency of exercise sessions is often accompanied by a greater total volume of exercise. It would be more relevant to assess whether greater benefits for glycemic control can be achieved by distributing the same exercise volume over more frequent exercise sessions.

By application of the CGM technique, it was shown that, for a fixed volume of exercise, short exercise sessions performed on a daily basis (30 minutes daily) offer no additional benefits for glycemic control compared to prolonged bouts of exercise performed less frequently (60 minutes every other day) (63). This finding implies that the total volume of exercise is more important than the frequency with which exercise sessions are being performed. In line with this view, a dose-response relationship has been observed between the volume of endurance exercise training and subsequent improvements in insulin sensitivity and glycemic control, irrespective of the frequency at which exercise sessions were being performed (53,64).

Practical Implications

Taken together, most of the currently available evidence indicates that the volume of exercise, rather than one of its components, is of key importance with regard to glycemic control. This concept has important implications for the prescription of exercise in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. When designing exercise programs, the initial focus should be on the selection of the appropriate volume of exercise. For example, we can prescribe patients to cover a distance of 18 km (∼11 miles) per week. This volume can be covered either by running (high intensity) or walking (low to moderate intensity). Moreover, covering the distance either as three bouts of 6 km or as six bouts of 3 km likely induces the same benefits for glycemic control.

Although it sounds simple, selecting an appropriate exercise volume for individual patients will be challenging. Unrealistic targets can reduce patients’ motivation, which may consequently affect their adherence to the exercise program (65,66). We should keep in mind that, although a large volume of exercise can induce greater effects than a small volume, a small volume of exercise is always better than no exercise at all.

After selecting the appropriate volume of exercise, the exercise characteristics (i.e., frequency, duration, intensity) can be used to tailor the exercise program to match individual patients’ preferences and functional abilities. Patients with diabetes complications such as vascular complications or reduced exercise tolerance may not be capable of performing prolonged exercise sessions at higher exercise intensities. These patients may prefer to perform more frequent, shorter exercise sessions at a low or lower intensity. On the other hand, relatively healthy patients with a busy schedule may prefer to perform more intense exercise sessions, thereby allowing a short or shorter exercise duration to attain the predefined volume of exercise.

Despite the well-documented benefits of exercise in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes, many patients with type 2 diabetes have difficulties engaging in or adhering to structured exercise intervention programs. The most cited reasons to abstain from regular exercise include lack of time, lack of motivation, lack of joy, physical discomfort during exercise, and resistance against exercise facilities (67). Therefore, it could be questioned whether engaging in a typical exercise intervention program is the most suitable physical activity intervention for all patients with type 2 diabetes.

It has been argued that physical activity strategies should focus more on increasing physical activity applicable to patients’ daily life and home environment (68,69). In that respect, an increase in unstructured physical activities such as strolling, walking a dog, or performing light gardening or household tasks may represent a promising alternative to structured exercise. This view is supported by evidence from epidemiological studies, indicating that nonexercise physical activity is beneficially associated with glucose concentrations independent of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (7072). Recent experimental studies have confirmed the benefits of nonexercise physical activity on postprandial blood glucose homeostasis. In this regard, repeated short bouts (2–15 minutes) of light physical activity during the postprandial phase have been shown to reduce postprandial glucose and/or insulin responses in nondiabetic individuals (7376).

Recently, we applied a comparable strategy in patients with type 2 diabetes (77). Glycemic control over 24 hours was assessed by CGM under sedentary control conditions and under conditions during which sedentary time was reduced by 15 minutes of strolling after each main meal (Figure 2). This study provided evidence that the introduction of repeated bouts of nonexercise physical activity (strolling) during the postprandial phase attenuates the postprandial rise in blood glucose and insulin concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes.

FIGURE 2.

Twenty-four–hour glycemic profiles in type 2 diabetic patients under sedentary conditions and under conditions in which prolonged sedentary time was reduced by three 15-minute bouts of daily living activities (ADL; grey squares) or by a single 45-minute bout of moderate-intensity endurance-type exercise (checkered square). The dotted lines indicate the ingestion of the main meals (at 8:30, 12:30, and 17:00 hours) or snack (at 20:30 hours). The error bars are not shown for clarity. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 77.

FIGURE 2.

Twenty-four–hour glycemic profiles in type 2 diabetic patients under sedentary conditions and under conditions in which prolonged sedentary time was reduced by three 15-minute bouts of daily living activities (ADL; grey squares) or by a single 45-minute bout of moderate-intensity endurance-type exercise (checkered square). The dotted lines indicate the ingestion of the main meals (at 8:30, 12:30, and 17:00 hours) or snack (at 20:30 hours). The error bars are not shown for clarity. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 77.

Close modal

Thus, besides structured exercise training, nonexercise physical activity can contribute to the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although an increase in nonexercise physical activity could overcome many of the barriers associated with the implementation of structured exercise, future studies are needed to evaluate whether this strategy leads to higher adherence rates and comparable or better long-term clinical benefits when compared to the implementation of more structured exercise intervention programs.

Practical Implications

Recent evidence suggests that an increase in nonexercise physical activity is effective in reducing postprandial hyperglycemia and improving glycemic control. Therefore, patients with type 2 diabetes should be encouraged to undertake light physical activity frequently throughout the day. Even very short bouts (2–15 minutes) of light physical activity are associated with substantial improvements in glycemic control. This strategy seems to be most effective when these activities are implemented in the postprandial state, thereby attenuating the postprandial rise in glucose concentrations (78). Because short bouts of light physical activity can be implemented easily in daily life, this strategy seems to be particularly valuable for patients who are unable or reluctant to participate in a more structured exercise program.

Although exercise is an important treatment strategy to improve long-term glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes, the impact of exercise on 24-hour glycemic control has remained largely unexplored. The introduction of CGM several years ago enabled researchers to assess the impact of exercise strategies on 24-hour glycemic control. The use of this technology demonstrated that a single bout of exercise reduces the prevalence of hyperglycemia throughout the subsequent 24-hour period. In this regard, resistance and endurance exercise appear to be equally effective in improving 24-hour glycemic control.

Moreover, recent data from CGM studies suggest that the volume of exercise, also referred to as the exercise dose, is the main determinant of exercise-induced improvements in glycemic control. Thus, when designing exercise programs, the initial focus should be on the selection of an appropriate volume of exercise. After selecting an appropriate volume of exercise, the other exercise characteristics (i.e., frequency, duration, and intensity) can be used to tailor the exercise program to match patients’ preferences and functional abilities.

In addition to structured exercise, nonexercise physical activities such as strolling, gardening, and performing household tasks have been associated with benefits for glycemic control. Therefore, health care professionals should encourage patients to undertake such activities frequently throughout the day.

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

1.
American Diabetes Association
.
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014
.
Diabetes Care
2014
;
37
(
Suppl. 1
):
S14
S80
2.
Sacks
DB
,
Bruns
DE
,
Goldstein
DE
, et al
.
Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus
.
Clin Chem
2002
;
48
:
436
472
3.
Zhang
Y
,
Hu
G
,
Yuan
Z
,
Chen
L
.
Glycosylated hemoglobin in relationship to cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
PLoS One
2012
;
7
:
e42551
4.
Balkau
B
,
Shipley
M
,
Jarrett
RJ
, et al
.
High blood glucose concentration is a risk factor for mortality in middle-aged nondiabetic men: 20-year follow-up in the Whitehall Study, the Paris Prospective Study, and the Helsinki Policemen Study
.
Diabetes Care
1998
;
21
:
360
367
5.
Donahue
RP
,
Abbott
RD
,
Reed
DM
,
Yano
K
.
Postchallenge glucose concentration and coronary heart disease in men of Japanese ancestry. Honolulu Heart Program
.
Diabetes
1987
;
36
:
689
692
6.
Barrett-Connor
E
,
Ferrara
A
.
Isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia and the risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in older women and men. The Rancho Bernardo Study
.
Diabetes Care
1998
;
21
:
1236
1239
7.
Shaw
JE
,
Hodge
AM
,
de Courten
M
,
Chitson
P
,
Zimmet
PZ
.
Isolated post-challenge hyperglycaemia confirmed as a risk factor for mortality
.
Diabetologia
1999
;
42
:
1050
1054
8.
Decode Study Group
.
Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria
.
Arch Intern Med
2001
;
161
:
397
405
9.
Qiao
Q
,
Pyorala
K
,
Pyorala
M
, et al
.
Two-hour glucose is a better risk predictor for incident coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality than fasting glucose
.
Eur Heart J
2002
;
23
:
1267
1275
10.
Meigs
JB
,
Nathan
DM
,
D’Agostino
RB
 Sr
,
Wilson
PW
.
Fasting and postchallenge glycemia and cardiovascular disease risk: the Framingham Offspring Study
.
Diabetes Care
2002
;
25
:
1845
1850
11.
de Vegt
F
,
Dekker
JM
,
Ruhe
HG
, et al
.
Hyperglycaemia is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Hoorn population: the Hoorn Study
.
Diabetologia
1999
;
42
:
926
931
12.
Pyorala
K
,
Savolainen
E
,
Lehtovirta
E
,
Punsar
S
,
Siltanen
P
.
Glucose tolerance and coronary heart disease: Helsinki Policemen Study
.
J Chronic Dis
1979
;
32
:
729
745
13.
Monnier
L
,
Colette
C
.
Glycemic variability: should we and can we prevent it?
Diabetes Care
2008
;
31
(
Suppl. 2
):
S150
S154
14.
Monnier
L
,
Colette
C
,
Owens
DR
.
Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it?
J Diabetes Sci Technol
2008
;
2
:
1094
1100
15.
Ceriello
A
,
Esposito
K
,
Piconi
L
, et al
.
Oscillating glucose is more deleterious to endothelial function and oxidative stress than mean glucose in normal and type 2 diabetic patients
.
Diabetes
2008
;
57
:
1349
1354
16.
Hay
LC
,
Wilmshurst
EG
,
Fulcher
G
.
Unrecognized hypo- and hyperglycemia in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the results of continuous glucose monitoring
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
2003
;
5
:
19
26
17.
Praet
SF
,
Manders
RJ
,
Meex
RC
, et al
.
Glycaemic instability is an underestimated problem in Type II diabetes
.
Clin Sci (Lond)
2006
;
111
:
119
126
18.
Bode
BW
,
Schwartz
S
,
Stubbs
HA
,
Block
JE
.
Glycemic characteristics in continuously monitored patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: normative values
.
Diabetes Care
2005
;
28
:
2361
2366
19.
van Dijk
JW
,
Manders
RJ
,
Hartgens
F
, et al
.
Postprandial hyperglycemia is highly prevalent throughout the day in type 2 diabetes patients
.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
2011
;
93
:
31
37
20.
Monnier
L
,
Lapinski
H
,
Colette
C
.
Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c)
.
Diabetes Care
2003
;
26
:
881
885
21.
Woerle
HJ
,
Neumann
C
,
Zschau
S
, et al
.
Impact of fasting and postprandial glycemia on overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: importance of postprandial glycemia to achieve target HbA1c levels
.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
2007
;
77
:
280
285
22.
International Diabetes Federation
.
Guideline for management of postmeal glucose in diabetes
.
23.
Boule
NG
,
Haddad
E
,
Kenny
GP
,
Wells
GA
,
Sigal
RJ
.
Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
.
JAMA
2001
;
286
:
1218
1227
24.
Snowling
NJ
,
Hopkins
WG
.
Effects of different modes of exercise training on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis
.
Diabetes Care
2006
;
29
:
2518
2527
25.
Thomas
DE
,
Elliott
EJ
,
Naughton
GA
.
Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2006
;
3
:
CD002968
26.
Umpierre
D
,
Ribeiro
PA
,
Kramer
CK
, et al
.
Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
JAMA
2011
;
305
:
1790
1799
27.
Burstein
R
,
Polychronakos
C
,
Toews
CJ
, et al
.
Acute reversal of the enhanced insulin action in trained athletes: association with insulin receptor changes
.
Diabetes
1985
;
34
:
756
760
28.
Heath
GW
,
Gavin
JR
 3rd
,
Hinderliter
JM
, et al
.
Effects of exercise and lack of exercise on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity
.
J Appl Physiol
1983
;
55
:
512
517
29.
King
DS
,
Dalsky
GP
,
Clutter
WE
, et al
.
Effects of exercise and lack of exercise on insulin sensitivity and responsiveness
.
J Appl Physiol
1988
;
64
:
1942
1946
30.
Schneider
SH
,
Amorosa
LF
,
Khachadurian
AK
,
Ruderman
NB
.
Studies on the mechanism of improved glucose control during regular exercise in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes
.
Diabetologia
1984
;
26
:
355
360
31.
Mikines
KJ
,
Sonne
B
,
Tronier
B
,
Galbo
H
.
Effects of acute exercise and detraining on insulin action in trained men
.
J Appl Physiol
1989
;
66
:
704
711
32.
Goodyear
LJ
,
Kahn
BB
.
Exercise, glucose transport, and insulin sensitivity
.
Annu Rev Med
1998
;
49
:
235
261
33.
Praet
SF
,
van Loon
LJ
.
Optimizing the therapeutic benefits of exercise in type 2 diabetes
.
J Appl Physiol
2007
;
103
;
1113
1120
34.
van Dijk
JW
,
Manders
RJ
,
Canfora
EE
, et al
.
Exercise and 24-h glycemic control: equal effects for all type 2 diabetes patients?
Med Sci Sports Exerc
2013
;
45
:
628
635
35.
Mikus
CR
,
Oberlin
DJ
,
Libla
J
,
Boyle
LJ
,
Thyfault
JP
.
Glycaemic control is improved by 7 days of aerobic exercise training in patients with type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetologia
2012
;
55
:
1417
1423
36.
MacLeod
SF
,
Terada
T
,
Chahal
BS
,
Boule
NG
.
Exercise lowers postprandial glucose but not fasting glucose in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of studies using continuous glucose monitoring
.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev
2013
;
29
:
593
603
37.
Terada
T
,
Loehr
S
,
Guigard
E
, et al
.
Test-retest reliability of a continuous glucose monitoring system in individuals with type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Technol Ther
2014
;
16
:
491
498
38.
Bacchi
E
,
Negri
C
,
Zanolin
ME
, et al
.
Metabolic effects of aerobic training and resistance training in type 2 diabetic subjects: a randomized controlled trial (the RAED2 study)
.
Diabetes Care
2012
;
35
:
676
682
39.
Fenicchia
LM
,
Kanaley
JA
,
Azevedo
JL
 Jr
, et al
.
Influence of resistance exercise training on glucose control in women with type 2 diabetes
.
Metabolism
2004
;
53
:
284
289
40.
Koopman
R
,
Manders
RJ
,
Zorenc
AH
, et al
.
A single session of resistance exercise enhances insulin sensitivity for at least 24 h in healthy men
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
2005
;
94
:
180
187
41.
Reed
ME
,
Ben-Ezra
V
,
Biggerstaff
KD
,
Nichols
DL
.
The effects of two bouts of high- and low-volume resistance exercise on glucose tolerance in normoglycemic women
.
J Strength Cond Res
2012
;
26
:
251
260
42.
Sigal
RJ
,
Kenny
GP
,
Boule
NG
, et al
.
Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial
.
Ann Intern Med
2007
;
147
:
357
369
43.
Church
TS
,
Blair
SN
,
Cocreham
S
, et al
.
Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
.
JAMA
2010
;
304
:
2253
2262
44.
van Dijk
JW
,
Manders
RJ
,
Tummers
K
, et al
.
Both resistance- and endurance-type exercise reduce the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and in insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients
.
Diabetologia
2012
;
55
:
1273
1282
45.
Leenders
M
,
Verdijk
LB
,
van der Hoeven
L
, et al
.
Patients with type 2 diabetes show a greater decline in muscle mass, muscle strength, and functional capacity with aging
.
J Am Med Dir Assoc
2013
;
14
:
585
592
46.
Park
SW
,
Goodpaster
BH
,
Strotmeyer
ES
, et al
.
Decreased muscle strength and quality in older adults with type 2 diabetes: the health, aging, and body composition study
.
Diabetes
2006
;
55
:
1813
1818
47.
Colberg
SR
,
Sigal
RJ
,
Fernhall
B
, et al
.
Exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement
.
Diabetes Care
2010
;
33
:
e147
e167
48.
Zanuso
S
,
Jimenez
A
,
Pugliese
G
,
Corigliano
G
,
Balducci
S
.
Exercise for the management of type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence
.
Acta Diabetol
2010
;
47
:
15
22
49.
Marwick
TH
,
Hordern
MD
,
Miller
T
, et al
.
Exercise training for type 2 diabetes mellitus: impact on cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association
.
Circulation
2009
;
119
:
3244
3262
50.
Wojtaszewski
JF
,
Nielsen
JN
,
Richter
EA
.
Invited review: effect of acute exercise on insulin signaling and action in humans
.
J Appl Physiol
2002
;
93
:
384
392
51.
DiPietro
L
,
Dziura
J
,
Yeckel
CW
,
Neufer
PD
.
Exercise and improved insulin sensitivity in older women: evidence of the enduring benefits of higher intensity training
.
J Appl Physiol
2006
;
100
:
142
149
52.
Coker
RH
,
Hays
NP
,
Williams
RH
, et al
.
Exercise-induced changes in insulin action and glycogen metabolism in elderly adults
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
2006
;
38
:
433
438
53.
Dube
JJ
,
Allison
KF
,
Rousson
V
,
Goodpaster
BH
,
Amati
F
.
Exercise dose and insulin sensitivity: relevance for diabetes prevention
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
2012
;
44
:
793
799
54.
Houmard
JA
,
Tanner
CJ
,
Slentz
CA
, et al
.
Effect of the volume and intensity of exercise training on insulin sensitivity
.
J Appl Physiol
2004
;
96
:
101
106
55.
Hansen
D
,
Dendale
P
,
Jonkers
RA
, et al
.
Continuous low- to moderate-intensity exercise training is as effective as moderate- to high-intensity exercise training at lowering blood HbA(1c) in obese type 2 diabetes patients
.
Diabetologia
2009
;
52
:
1789
1797
56.
Balducci
S
,
Zanuso
S
,
Cardelli
P
, et al
.
Effect of high- versus low-intensity supervised aerobic and resistance training on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes; the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES)
.
PLoS One
2012
;
7
:
e49297
57.
Manders
RJ
,
Van Dijk
JW
,
van Loon
LJ
.
Low-intensity exercise reduces the prevalence of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
2010
;
42
:
219
225
58.
Newsom
SA
,
Everett
AC
,
Hinko
A
,
Horowitz
JF
.
A single session of low-intensity exercise is sufficient to enhance insulin sensitivity into the next day in obese adults
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:
2516
2522
59.
Mikines
KJ
,
Sonne
B
,
Farrell
PA
,
Tronier
B
,
Galbo
H
.
Effect of physical exercise on sensitivity and responsiveness to insulin in humans
.
Am J Physiol
1988
: 
254
:
E248
E259
60.
Perseghin
G
,
Price
TB
,
Petersen
KF
, et al
.
Increased glucose transport-phosphorylation and muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise training in insulin-resistant subjects
.
N Engl J Med
1996
;
335
:
1357
1362
61.
King
DS
,
Baldus
PJ
,
Sharp
RL
, et al
.
Time course for exercise-induced alterations in insulin action and glucose tolerance in middle-aged people
.
J Appl Physiol
1995
;
78
:
17
22
62.
Umpierre
D
,
Ribeiro
PA
,
Schaan
BD
,
Ribeiro
JP
.
Volume of supervised exercise training impacts glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis
.
Diabetologia
2013
;
56
:
242
251
63.
van Dijk
JW
,
Tummers
K
,
Stehouwer
CD
,
Hartgens
F
,
van Loon
LJ
.
Exercise therapy in type 2 diabetes: is daily exercise required to optimize glycemic control?
Diabetes Care
2012
;
35
:
948
954
64.
Di Loreto
C
,
Fanelli
C
,
Lucidi
P
, et al
.
Make your diabetic patients walk: long-term impact of different amounts of physical activity on type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2005
;
28
:
1295
1302
65.
Casey
D
,
De Civita
M
,
Dasgupta
K
.
Understanding physical activity facilitators and barriers during and following a supervised exercise programme in type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study
.
Diabet Med
2010
;
27
:
79
84
66.
Di Loreto
C
,
Fanelli
C
,
Lucidi
P
, et al
.
Validation of a counseling strategy to promote the adoption and the maintenance of physical activity by type 2 diabetic subjects
.
Diabetes Care
2003
;
26
:
404
408
67.
Egan
AM
,
Mahmood
WA
,
Fenton
R
, et al
.
Barriers to exercise in obese patients with type 2 diabetes
.
QJM
2013
;
106
:
635
638
68.
Solomon
TP
,
Thyfault
JP
.
Type 2 diabetes sits in a chair
.
Diabetes Obes Metab
2013
;
15
:
987
992
69.
De Feo
P
,
Schwarz
P
.
Is physical exercise a core therapeutical element for most patients with type 2 diabetes?
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
(
Suppl. 2
):
S149
S154
70.
Healy
GN
,
Dunstan
DW
,
Salmon
J
, et al
.
Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk
.
Diabetes Care
2008
;
31
:
661
666
71.
Healy
GN
,
Dunstan
DW
,
Salmon
J
, et al
.
Objectively measured light-intensity physical activity is independently associated with 2-h plasma glucose
.
Diabetes Care
2007
;
30
:
1384
1389
72.
Yates
T
,
Henson
J
,
Khunti
K
, et al
.
Effect of physical activity measurement type on the association between walking activity and glucose regulation in a high-risk population recruited from primary care
.
Int J Epidemiol
2013
;
42
:
533
540
73.
DiPietro
L
,
Gribok
A
,
Stevens
MS
,
Hamm
LF
,
Rumpler
W
.
Three 15-min bouts of moderate postmeal walking significantly improves 24-h glycemic control in older people at risk for impaired glucose tolerance
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:
3262
3268
74.
Peddie
MC
,
Bone
JL
,
Rehrer
NJ
, et al
.
Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2013
;
98
:
358
366
75.
Dunstan
DW
,
Kingwell
BA
,
Larsen
R
, et al
.
Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses
.
Diabetes Care
2012
;
35
:
976
983
76.
Nygaard
H
,
Tomten
SE
,
Hostmark
AT
.
Slow postmeal walking reduces postprandial glycemia in middle-aged women
.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab
2009
;
34
:
1087
1092
77.
van Dijk
JW
,
Venema
M
,
van Mechelen
W
, et al
.
Effect of moderate-intensity exercise versus activities of daily living on 24-hour blood glucose homeostasis in male patients with type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2013
;
36
:
3448
3453
78.
Colberg
SR
,
Zarrabi
L
,
Bennington
L
, et al
.
Postprandial walking is better for lowering the glycemic effect of dinner than pre-dinner exercise in type 2 diabetic individuals
.
J Am Med Dir Assoc
2009
;
10
:
394
397
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 for details.