Health Care Transition in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and an A1C >9%: Qualitative Analysis of Pre-Transition Perspectives Free

We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews of adolescents (aged 13–17 years) and young adults (aged 18–23 years) with type 1 diabetes and an A1C >9% to elicit their perspectives pertaining to transition from pediatric to adult diabetes care. The institutional review board of Boston Children’s Hospital approved this study.

We applied purposive sampling techniques to recruit adolescents and young adults (aged 14–23 years) who were diagnosed with diabetes >1 year ago and who, at the time of the interviews, were receiving care at a comprehensive pediatric diabetes center operating within a referral pediatrics hospital in Boston, MA (20). At this pediatric diabetes center at the time of the study, there was no formal transition programing. To be eligible for our study, participants had to have an A1C >9.0% (measured via DCA Vantage Analyzer [Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA]). All 14 participants completed informed consent (or a parent/guardian consented and the participant gave assent, depending on age) and were compensated $50 for their time.

Our research team created a detailed interview guide based on multidisciplinary expert consensus and an extensive review of the academic literature on transitions of care from pediatric to adult practice (see the Supplemental Material). Experts included the study senior author (K.G.), as well as other pediatric diabetologists, psychologists experienced in diabetes care and qualitative research, and adult diabetologists. Two members of the study team (T.B. and T.D.) conducted the 14 independent interviews in 2016. Interviews were professionally transcribed.

Interview questions ranged from open-ended questions designed to elicit personal experiences and subjective responses to more precise, focused questions designed to collect a range of responses to the same question. Major topics covered in these interviews included patients’ knowledge of the transition process, patients’ perceptions of the appropriate age to begin the process, patients’ perceptions of their independence and of their family’s role in diabetes care, patients’ experience of pediatric care, and patients’ perceptions of adult care.

Thematic analysis is an accepted and commonly used method in qualitative research, allowing investigators to consolidate data across multiple participants and generate over-arching conclusions (25,26). Given the existing body of literature on this topic, we selected framework analysis for our specific approach (27). To begin the framework analysis procedures for this study, an initial code set was generated from extensive literature review of previous qualitative work in diabetes transition. Codes from this framework were applied to the transcripts; additionally, many novel codes were generated and added to the framework throughout the analysis process (27).

Three team members (E.S.T., J.R., and K.G.) independently read each interview transcript and coded it according to the aforementioned thematic analysis. The study team iteratively met to review individual coding and come to a consensus regarding all codes for each interview. During the progressive analysis of transcripts, saturation with regard to thematic content was clearly reached based on research team consensus. After the coding process, codes were entered into NVivo 12 software (QSR International Pty Ltd., Victoria, Australia) to enable further thematic grouping and analysis.

The team met to conduct second-level coding and ultimately identify final, key themes best representing the body of data. An audit trail was maintained to track the process of generating final themes.

The research team conducted interviews of 14 adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and an A1C >9% (Table 1). Participants were between 14 and 23 years of age. Nine participants were adolescents (mean age 15.0 ± 0.9 years) and five were young adults (mean age 20.8 ± 2.2 years); 57% of the sample was male. Of the participants, 79% were Caucasian and 14% identified as Hispanic.

Duration of diabetes ranged from 2 to 18 years, with a mean and SD of 8.2 and 4.6 years, respectively. Average A1C was 9.73 ± 1.0% for adolescents and 9.42 ± 0.3% for young adults who participated.

Analysis of the 14 semi-structured interviews yielded the following four themes regarding transition from pediatric to adult care in teenagers with type 1 diabetes and an A1C >9%: 1) lack of formal preparation, 2) desire for delayed and gradual transition, 3) attachment to pediatric providers, and 4) concern about an impersonal adult care setting. Based on the research team’s coding and subsequent thematic analysis, these themes were found to be consistent across adolescents and young adults. The following section provides more detailed explanations of the described themes, as well as illustrative quotations from interview transcripts.

Regardless of age and duration of diabetes, participants reported that they did not receive any formal transition preparation. They tended to believe it was the responsibility of the provider to bring up transition when appropriate and generally were unaware of what the process would entail.

Participants consistently seemed surprised by the questions about transition and uncertain of the expectations of them or their providers. When they had considered the impending transition, the most they tended to expect from their providers was a list of referrals but had not further considered what they or their provider needed to do to prepare for the transition.

Both adolescents and young adults, regardless of their age, expressed the opinion that transition discussions and transition itself should happen in the future. Although the degree of delay of transition planning varied across participants, the desire for delay was essentially universal. The following are a series of responses interviewers received to questions about when it would be appropriate to think about transitioning to adult care.

Patients who were least inclined to plan for transition of care suggested changes in health insurance and/or major life transitions such as moving to college as the only real impetus to consider switching care to an adult provider and actively endorsed avoidance. They asserted a desire to “deal with” transition of care later, once other issues in their lives and health care were more settled.

Interview participants demonstrated a near-universal sense of attachment to their pediatric care providers, which was often accompanied by a hesitancy to consider leaving their care.

Multiple participants focused on the notion that their pediatric providers knew their whole history and unique elements of their lives and diabetes.

Additionally, they describe pediatric care as more gentle and friendlier, which stands in contrast to their perceptions of adult care (see Theme 4: Concern About an Impersonal Adult Care Setting).

When asked about their concerns about transition and perceptions of adult care, participants had pervasive anxieties about switching to new providers and their ability to form therapeutic relationships.

At least in part, these concerns seemed to be driven by a perception that adult care providers would be unable to meet young adult patients’ needs and would instead be more direct and less lenient than their pediatric providers.

Given these concerns about their potential future adult care settings, participants voiced a desire for their current pediatric providers to share personalized lists of adult physicians as part of the transition process.

This qualitative study detailed the voices and perspectives on transition to adult care of adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and an A1C >9% who were cared for at a U.S. pediatric center. The semi-structured interview format elicited patients’ thoughts on a range of transition-related topics. Rigorous thematic analysis allowed for the generation of clear themes regarding their shared experiences and opinions. Notably, these data shed light on a vulnerable population previously underrepresented in the literature, and our findings provide guidance for pedia‐tric providers in prioritizing topics for discussion with this population.

The logic of qualitative sampling rests on the idea of transferability (i.e., whether the results advance theoretical understandings and are relevant to multiple situations) rather than generalizability or representativeness (28). The themes that emerged from this analysis focus primarily on ignorance about transition, desire to delay transition and remain comfortable in pediatric provider relationships, and anxiety about a stricter adult care setting.

The mean A1C of this study population was 9.64%, which more closely mirrors national averages in this demographic compared with past studies that have relied on less representative samples with A1C levels closer to ADA targets (4,7,17,18,21,22,29). For example, in a large national survey of transition experiences, 78% of patients had a self-reported A1C <9.0% (7).

Previous studies (in populations with relatively lower A1C levels) showed deficits in transition preparation counseling (6,7,11,22). Here, we provide detailed perspectives from a population of adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and an A1C >9% voicing a similar lack of awareness or understanding about the transition process. It should be noted that, at the time of this study, the center at which these patients received their care did not have any formal transition programming in place. Beyond this, however, we show a new theme spanning the age range of this study’s participants: the desire of both teens and young adults to defer transition and “deal with it later.” This tendency toward deferring transition preparation is informative for providers as they consider how to guide this population through a safe and appropriately timed transition.

In general, lack of transition preparation has been associated with gaps between pediatric and adult care, which in turn may contribute to poor outcomes (4,7). This patient population is already at high risk of both acute and chronic complications because of elevated A1C, making the reported lack of transition preparation among this vulnerable subset of patients with type 1 diabetes particularly concerning for providers (29,30).

Although our study did specifically elicit provider perspectives, providers may be more likely to defer transition conversations with patients who have higher A1C values (i.e., wait for a period in which target glucose levels are met). A U.S. national survey of pediatric endocrinologists caring for patients with A1C levels above target raised this issue, although findings were inconsistent in terms of the precise relationship between the decision to transition patients and A1C level (31). This topic warrants further research, and diabetes care providers may benefit from enhanced further consideration and guidelines regarding the role of A1C level in determining transition timing and disposition.

When prompted to consider the transition preparation components that may be most useful, it is interesting to note that teens with elevated A1C recognize the value of referrals to recommended providers and even the idea of communication between adult and pediatric providers, as has been noted in past studies (21,22). This recommendation is iteratively represented in all diabetes transition consensus statements and is explored in interventional work; however, it has yet to translate consistently into practice (5,32).

Surveys of both pediatric providers and patients have demonstrated the important issue of mutual attachment between pediatric providers and patients with type 1 diabetes (7,31). Previous qualitative work in post-transition young adults suggested increased attachment and reticence to transition among patients with target A1C compared with those with A1C above target, who wanted a “fresh start” (33). Our sample of pediatric patients voiced high levels of attachment to their providers, which served as a hindrance to considering transition. The pervasive nature of this sentiment suggests the need to develop strategies to openly address attachment and facilitate the emotional aspects of transition for patients across the A1C spectrum.

Along similar lines, our findings highlight a need for pediatric providers to explicitly address preconceived notions about adult diabetes care. Perceptions of adult care as being franker and more focused on long-term diabetes complications have been borne out in other qualitative literature on the subject (7,22). However, our cohort focused particularly on a desire to be known by their new provider, which must also be addressed in preparing for transition.

This study has a number of limitations. First, the patient population reflects that of a specialty pediatric diabetes center in a referral pediatric hospital and, as such, does not appropriately represent the diversity of patient experiences across the United States or internationally. However, qualitative research is not designed to create a representative sample per se, but rather to understand different perspectives (28). Further research should be conducted in different patient demographic groups, as well as with providers and families, to expand our understanding of transition perspectives among patients with a broader spectrum of glycemic status and among their caregivers. Additional research of a more quantitative nature would also enhance our understanding of the risks and benefits of transition at particular ages for patients with elevated A1C. A prospective cohort study of glucose levels across the transition in different care delivery models would also further advance the field.

This qualitative study generated several important themes regarding the perspectives of adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and an A1C >9% on transition to adult care. Their lack of preparation for transition, desire to delay the process, attachment to their pediatric providers, and fear/concerns about adult care suggest a number of areas for potential intervention. Explicit conversations must take place to make youth aware of identified issues in the transition to adult care. Shared decision-making and planning cannot be deferred, even if transition itself is appropriately delayed. Given the uniquely vulnerable position of these patients, further research is warranted to generate and test interventions to protect their short- and long-term health during the transition period and beyond.

This project was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease grant NIDDK K23DK102655. E.S.T. was supported by grant number T32-HS000063 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. E.S.T. was also supported by National Institutes of Health grant T32-DK007699.

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

E.S.T. assisted in coding the interview transcripts and generating themes and wrote the manuscript. J.R. assisted in coding the interview transcripts, generating themes, and writing and revising the manuscript. T.B. and T.D. recruited and interviewed participants. K.G. conceptualized the study design, created the interview guide, and assisted in coding the transcripts, generating themes, and writing and revising the manuscript. K.G. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

This project was previously presented in poster form at the 45th annual conference of the International Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes, 30 October to 2 November 2019, in Boston, MA.