Antidiabetic medications that improve glycemic control as well as cardiovascular outcomes will be the mainstay of treatment for type 2 diabetes moving forward. This article reviews the beneficial effects of the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone of ameliorating hyperglycemia and improving cardiovascular risk factors. While the newer sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist drug classes have confirmed cardiovascular benefits, pioglitazone also has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, in both people with type 2 diabetes and nondiabetic subjects with insulin resistance. Adverse effects associated with pioglitazone can be mitigated by its use at a lower dose and in combination with antidiabetic agents from other drug classes.

Despite advances in treatment strategies for diabetes, overall mortality is twofold higher in patients with type 2 diabetes (1), and cardiovascular mortality is approximately three- to fourfold higher compared with individuals without diabetes (2). Intensive glycemic control has been shown consistently to improve microvascular complications (3,4). However, the effect of glycemic control on macrovascular disease, particularly cardiovascular disease (CVD), is not clear (5,6).

The possible adverse cardiovascular outcomes associated with the thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone led to mandatory cardiovascular safety trials for approval of all new antidiabetic medications (7,8). Although initially intended to demonstrate noninferiority to placebo, these cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) of agents in two newer drug classes—sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists—in fact demonstrated superiority or improved cardiovascular outcomes compared with standard treatment. Because of the recent explosion of data from CVOTs of SGLT2 inhibitors (913) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (14,15) and relatively negative data associated with thiazolidinediones (16,17), pioglitazone has been relatively overlooked despite its beneficial effects on cardiovascular outcomes and durability of glycemic control. Given that it is now a generic medication available at a fraction of cost of the newer antidiabetic agents, there is renewed interest in this drug, particularly from a public health perspective (18).

Pioglitazone is the only true insulin sensitizer that is readily available. Although rosiglitazone is still available, it has fallen out of favor because of possible adverse cardiovascular outcomes and is rarely used. For pioglitazone, misinformation regarding its association with bladder cancer and worsening congestive heart failure (CHF) has contributed to reluctance to prescribe the drug on the part of both primary care providers and endocrinologists.

Because pioglitazone was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration before its 2008 mandate of CVOTs, a true CVOT of pioglitazone has not been performed. Here, we review the currently available data on the effect of pioglitazone on cardiovascular outcomes.

The effects of pioglitazone on cardiovascular outcomes are based on the results of multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs), observational studies, analyses of real-world data, and meta-analyses of clinical trials. One of the earliest trials with pioglitazone was the PROactive (Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events) study (19), in which 5,238 subjects with type 2 diabetes and preexisting CVD were randomized to receive pioglitazone or placebo. After 2.9 years, although the effect of pioglitazone on the primary end point, which included leg revascularization, did not reach statistical significance, pioglitazone significantly reduced the composite three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) outcome, which included nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, P = 0.027). Three-point MACE is the standard primary outcome in all recent CVOTs of newer antidiabetic medications. In patients with a history of stroke or MI, pioglitazone treatment led to a 28% and 24% lower risk of recurrent stroke (20) and MI (21), respectively. Although this study is reported as a negative study, it should be emphasized that the negative results primarily resulted from inclusion of leg revascularization in the primary end point; this outcome is usually resistant to interventions and is not included in the primary end points of most CVOTs.

Insulin resistance had been associated with an increased incidence of CVD (2224), as well cerebrovascular accidents (2527). In the PROactive study, pioglitazone treatment was associated with a decreased incidence of recurrent stroke (20). Because of potential benefits in cardiovascular outcomes with pioglitazone and the possible common link between the two conditions of insulin resistance, a large RCT, the IRIS (Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke) study, examined whether pioglitazone, an insulin sensitizer, improved cardiovascular outcomes in nondiabetic subjects who had had a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (28). In 3,876 insulin-resistant subjects with a history of stroke or TIA who were treated on average for 4.8 years, pioglitazone reduced the incidence of stroke or MI by 24% (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.93, P = 0007). Furthermore, a planned secondary analysis from the same study demonstrated that pioglitazone versus placebo decreased the risk of acute coronary syndrome by 29% (P = 0.02) (29,30). The development of diabetes was also significantly reduced (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33–0.69).

Several meta-analyses and real-world studies have confirmed the observations summarized above (31). A meta-analysis of nine RCTs of pioglitazone with 12,026 participants demonstrated that pioglitazone treatment was associated with a decreased risk of MACE in individuals with prediabetes or insulin resistance (relative risk [RR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.93) and in those with type 2 diabetes (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.97) (32). Another, similar meta-analysis of 10 RCTs, which included patients with CVD who were on pioglitazone treatment, also reported a reduced risk of MACE (33). A recent meta-analysis, which included 19,645 patients from 26 RCTs, examined the effect of pioglitazone on primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone was found to reduce three-point MACE in subjects with preexisting coronary artery disease by 32% (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.7–0.9), which was mainly the result of a reduction in nonfatal MI and stroke (34). However, the cardioprotective effects of pioglitazone were not observed in patients without a history of CVD. Pioglitazone also reduced albuminuria by 18.5%.

In a retrospective analysis of 91,511 U.K. patients with type 2 diabetes who were followed for 7.1 years, pioglitazone, compared with metformin, reduced all-cause mortality by 31–39% (35). Similar results were reported in another European study of a large cohort of 56,536 patients with type 2 diabetes who were first-time users of pioglitazone or insulin. Mortality was 67% lower in patients treated with pioglitazone (36).

Although pioglitazone reduced cardiovascular events in patients with prior cardiovascular events, with or without type 2 diabetes, its effect in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin is not clear. In a recent Italian pragmatic study, TOSCA-IT (Thiazolidinediones or Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Accidents Intervention Trial) (37), patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin were randomized to receive pioglitazone or a sulfonylurea as add-on therapy. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, there was no difference in cardiovascular events between the two groups. However, the lack of cardioprotection from pioglitazone in this study could have been the result of the following reasons: 1) only 11% of participants had had a prior cardiovascular events, and thus it was mainly a primary prevention trial; 2) there were methodological problems: the study was unblinded and the discontinuation rate was higher in patients on pioglitazone; and 3) the event rate in this study was extremely low, and the study likely was underpowered to detect any significant difference between the two groups. Regardless, it appears that, as with SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, the beneficial cardiovascular effects of pioglitazone are observed mainly in patients with preexisting CVD (10,14).

It is well known that targeting hyperglycemia alone has only minimal effects on cardiovascular outcomes. The question arises as to how the antihyperglycemic agent pioglitazone is effective in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Pioglitazone is the only true insulin sensitizer currently available. It ameliorates insulin resistance, which is one of the core metabolic defects in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and possibly of ASCVD. In smaller mechanistic studies, pioglitazone compared with the sulfonylurea glimepiride reduced the progression of atherosclerosis measured by intravascular ultrasound (38). In the CHICAGO (Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Atherosclerosis Using Pioglitazone) study, pioglitazone also reduced the rate of increase of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) (39). In the ACT NOW (Actos Now for Prevention of Diabetes) study, pioglitazone similarly reduced the rate of progression of CIMT in patients with prediabetes (40).

Apart from its beneficial effects on skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity and β-cell function, pioglitazone improves several cardiovascular risk factors, including lowering plasma free fatty acid concentrations, which play a major role in skeletal muscle, hepatic, and adipocyte insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction (41). In addition to metabolic effects, pioglitazone also has potent anti-inflammatory properties. It increases the anti-inflammatory cytokine adiponectin, while reducing proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α and the procoagulant factor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (42,43). In a meta-analysis of 15 RCTs, pioglitazone also improved conventional cardiovascular risk factors; it was found to lower triglycerides by 0.2 mmol/L, reduce LDL cholesterol by 0.13 mmol/L, and increase HDL cholesterol by 0.068 mmol/L (44). Similar observations were noted in another recent meta-analysis, which only analyzed the effect of pioglitazone monotherapy and showed that, compared with other antihyperglycemic drugs, pioglitazone had a favorable effect on lipid metabolism and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (45). In addition, small trials have shown that pioglitazone improves left ventricular function (46) and have suggested that it has direct anti-atherosclerotic effects in the arterial wall. Thus, the combination of effects of pioglitazone on insulin sensitivity, lipid profile, blood pressure, systemic inflammation, and possibly directly on the vascular endothelium likely contribute to the beneficial effects of pioglitazone on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

One of the factors limiting widespread use of pioglitazone is concern about potential adverse effects. Here, we address the important common adverse effects, including weight gain, fluid retention and worsening of CHF, fractures, and the risk of bladder cancer, as well as ways to mitigate them.

Pioglitazone therapy is associated with a weight gain of ∼2–3 kg over 1 year (47). However, the weight gain associated with pioglitazone is dose related; if the higher 45-mg dose is avoided, weight gain will be relatively modest. Again, the weight gain is primarily the result of redistribution of fat. Visceral fat is reduced, and fat in subcutaneous adipose tissue is increased, which is metabolically healthier (41,48). Thus, despite an increase in fat mass, the amount of anti-inflammatory adipokine adiponectin is increased, while proinflammatory adipokines are decreased (42).

The issue with fluid retention and CHF is a concern, although not all studies have shown increased incidence of CHF. Pioglitazone should not be used in patients with symptomatic heart failure. If edema is the main concern, combination therapy with a low-dose diuretic or SGLT2 inhibitor might lessen this problem. In fact, when empagliflozin was added to pioglitazone, there was net weight loss (49,50).

With regard to fractures, this concern is mostly limited to post-menopausal women and primarily involves distal fractures (51). Pioglitazone should be used cautiously in patients with a risk of fractures.

The concern about bladder cancer with pioglitazone was initially raised during the PROactive study, in which a nonsignificant increase in bladder cancer was noted. However, during the subsequent long-term observational study, in which PROactive participants were followed for 8.7 years, there was no increase in risk of bladder cancer (52). A meta-analysis in the British Journal of Medicine was the first study to link bladder cancer to pioglitazone (16,17); however, there was no association when bladder cancer cases during the first year were subsequently excluded (52). Two large, observational studies that analyzed 10-year follow-up data on patients treated with pioglitazone did not find any association with bladder cancer (53). Similarly, in a multinational cohort with >1 million patients with type 2 diabetes, the HR for bladder cancer with pioglitazone was 1.01 (P = NS) (53). Another meta-analysis involving a large number of patients did not find evidence to link pioglitazone and bladder cancer (54). Thus, although at present there is no causal relationship between pioglitazone treatment and bladder cancer, this drug should be avoided in patients with active bladder cancer and those with a history of prior bladder cancer.

Along with comprehensive lifestyle modification, metformin is recommended as the first-line therapy for all patients with type 2 diabetes, and other medications may be added subsequently (55). A recent study demonstrated that early intensive treatment with a combination of metformin, pioglitazone, and exenatide provides more durable glycemic control than standard stepwise intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy (56).

Pioglitazone may be started as monotherapy or in combination with metformin and an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist, particularly in patients with preexisting CVD and those at a high risk of CVD. Because most patients with type 2 diabetes are obese, weight gain and edema are concerns that discourage many primary care providers from prescribing this medication. This issue can be addressed by using a lower dose of pioglitazone (15 or 30 mg/day) and using it in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist. We have shown earlier that even low-dose pioglitazone (15 mg/day) improved glycemic control, β-cell function, and inflammation with minimal weight gain (57). In fact, a combination of pioglitazone with one of the newer antidiabetic agents may have synergistic cardioprotective effects.

Duality of Interest

C.S.-H. serves on a speaker’s bureau for Novo Nordisk. R.E.J.R. has received speaker and/or consultant fees and/or educational sponsorships from AstraZeneca, BioQuest, GI Dynamics, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Takeda. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions

D.T. and C.S.-H. researched data, wrote/edited the manuscript, and contributed to the discussion. R.E.J.R. edited the manuscript and contributed to the discussion. D.T. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, takes responsibility for the integrity of this review.

1.
Tancredi
M
,
Rosengren
A
,
Svensson
AM
, et al
.
Excess mortality among persons with type 2 diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
373
:
1720
1732
2.
Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration
;
Sarwar
N
,
Gao
P
,
Seshasai
SR
, et al
.
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies
.
Lancet
2010
;
375
:
2215
2222
3.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group
.
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)
.
Lancet
1998
;
352
:
837
853
4.
Zoungas
S
,
Arima
H
,
Gerstein
HC
, et al.;
Collaborators on Trials of Lowering Glucose (CONTROL) group
.
Effects of intensive glucose control on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials
.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2017
;
5
:
431
437
5.
Control Group
;
Turnbull
FM
,
Abraira
C
,
Anderson
RJ
, et al
.
Intensive glucose control and macrovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes
.
Diabetologia
2009
;
52
:
2288
2298
6.
ACCORD Study Group
;
Gerstein
HC
,
Miller
ME
,
Genuth
S
, et al
.
Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes
.
N Engl J Med
2011
;
364
:
818
828
7.
Nissen
SE
.
The rise and fall of rosiglitazone
.
Eur Heart J
2010
;
31
:
773
776
8.
Nissen
SE
,
Wolski
K
.
Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes
.
N Engl J Med
2007
;
356
:
2457
2471
9.
Packer
M
,
Anker
SD
,
Butler
J
, et al.;
EMPEROR-Reduced Trial Investigators
.
Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure
.
N Engl J Med
2020
;
383
:
1413
1424
10.
Zinman
B
,
Wanner
C
,
Lachin
JM
, et al.;
EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators
.
Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
373
:
2117
2128
11.
Borghi
C
,
Cicero
AFG
.
Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
.
N Engl J Med
2020
;
382
:
972
12.
McMurray
JJV
,
Solomon
SD
,
Inzucchi
SE
, et al.;
DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators
.
Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
.
N Engl J Med
2019
;
381
:
1995
2008
13.
Neal
B
,
Perkovic
V
,
Mahaffey
KW
, et al.;
CANVAS Program Collaborative Group
.
Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2017
;
377
:
644
657
14.
Marso
SP
,
Daniels
GH
,
Brown-Frandsen
K
, et al.;
LEADER Steering Committee
;
LEADER Trial Investigators
.
Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2016
;
375
:
311
322
15.
Marso
SP
,
Bain
SC
,
Consoli
A
, et al.;
SUSTAIN-6 Investigators
.
Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes
.
N Engl J Med
2016
;
375
:
1834
1844
16.
Hillaire-Buys
D
,
Faillie
JL
.
Pioglitazone and the risk of bladder cancer
.
BMJ
2012
;
344
:
e3500
17.
Kermode-Scott
B
.
Meta-analysis confirms raised risk of bladder cancer from pioglitazone
.
BMJ
2012
;
345
:
e4541
18.
DeFronzo
RA
,
Inzucchi
S
,
Abdul-Ghani
M
,
Nissen
SE
.
Pioglitazone: the forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes
.
Diab Vasc Dis Res
2019
;
16
:
133
143
19.
Dormandy
JA
,
Charbonnel
B
,
Eckland
DJ
, et al.;
PROactive Investigators
.
Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial
.
Lancet
2005
;
366
:
1279
1289
20.
Wilcox
R
,
Bousser
MG
,
Betteridge
DJ
, et al.;
PROactive Investigators
.
Effects of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without previous stroke: results from PROactive (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events 04)
.
Stroke
2007
;
38
:
865
873
21.
Erdmann
E
,
Dormandy
JA
,
Charbonnel
B
,
Massi-Benedetti
M
,
Moules
IK
;
PROactive Investigators
.
The effect of pioglitazone on recurrent myocardial infarction in 2,445 patients with type 2 diabetes and previous myocardial infarction: results from the PROactive (PROactive 05) Study
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2007
;
49
:
1772
1780
22.
Sung
KC
,
Choi
JH
,
Gwon
HC
, et al
.
Relationship between insulin resistance and coronary artery calcium in young men and women
.
PLoS One
2013
;
8
:
e53316
23.
Færch
K
,
Bergman
B
,
Perreault
L
.
Does insulin resistance drive the association between hyperglycemia and cardiovascular risk?
PLoS One
2012
;
7
:
e39260
24.
Haffner
SM
,
Mykkänen
L
,
Festa
A
,
Burke
JP
,
Stern
MP
.
Insulin-resistant prediabetic subjects have more atherogenic risk factors than insulin-sensitive prediabetic subjects: implications for preventing coronary heart disease during the prediabetic state
.
Circulation
2000
;
101
:
975
980
25.
Calleja
AI
,
García-Bermejo
P
,
Cortijo
E
, et al
.
Insulin resistance is associated with a poor response to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke
.
Diabetes Care
2011
;
34
:
2413
2417
26.
Hishinuma
A
,
Majima
M
,
Kurabayashi
H
.
Is insulin resistance related to recurrence of stroke or incident of ischemic heart disease in patients with stroke? A preliminary report
.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
2009
;
18
:
294
297
27.
Rundek
T
,
Gardener
H
,
Xu
Q
, et al
.
Insulin resistance and risk of ischemic stroke among nondiabetic individuals from the northern Manhattan study
.
Arch Neurol
2010
;
67
:
1195
1200
28.
Kernan
WN
,
Viscoli
CM
,
Furie
KL
, et al.;
IRIS Trial Investigators
.
Pioglitazone after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack
.
N Engl J Med
2016
;
374
:
1321
1331
29.
Young
LH
,
Viscoli
CM
,
Curtis
JP
, et al.;
IRIS Investigators
.
Cardiac outcomes after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: effects of pioglitazone in patients with insulin resistance without diabetes mellitus
.
Circulation
2017
;
135
:
1882
1893
30.
Yaghi
S
,
Furie
KL
,
Viscoli
CM
, et al.;
IRIS Trial Investigators
.
Pioglitazone prevents stroke in patients with a recent transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke: a planned secondary analysis of the IRIS trial (Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke)
.
Circulation
2018
;
137
:
455
463
31.
Lincoff
AM
,
Wolski
K
,
Nicholls
SJ
,
Nissen
SE
.
Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
.
JAMA
2007
;
298
:
1180
1188
32.
Liao
HW
,
Saver
JL
,
Wu
YL
,
Chen
TH
,
Lee
M
,
Ovbiagele
B
.
Pioglitazone and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with insulin resistance, pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
BMJ Open
2017
;
7
:
e013927
33.
de Jong
M
,
van der Worp
HB
,
van der Graaf
Y
,
Visseren
FLJ
,
Westerink
J
.
Pioglitazone and the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
.
Cardiovasc Diabetol
2017
;
16
:
134
34.
Zhou
Y
,
Huang
Y
,
Ji
X
,
Wang
X
,
Shen
L
,
Wang
Y
.
Pioglitazone for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2020
;
105
:
dgz252
35.
Tzoulaki
I
,
Molokhia
M
,
Curcin
V
, et al
.
Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database
.
BMJ
2009
;
339
:
b4731
36.
Strongman
H
,
Christopher
S
,
Majak
M
, et al
.
Pioglitazone and cause-specific risk of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: extended analysis from a European multidatabase cohort study
.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
2018
;
6
:
e000481
37.
Vaccaro
O
,
Masulli
M
,
Nicolucci
A
, et al.;
Thiazolidinediones Or Sulfonylureas Cardiovascular Accidents Intervention Trial (TOSCA.IT) study group
;
Italian Diabetes Society
.
Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial
.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol
2017
;
5
:
887
897
38.
Nissen
SE
,
Nicholls
SJ
,
Wolski
K
, et al.;
PERISCOPE Investigators
.
Comparison of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PERISCOPE randomized controlled trial
.
JAMA
2008
;
299
:
1561
1573
39.
Mazzone
T
,
Meyer
PM
,
Feinstein
SB
, et al
.
Effect of pioglitazone compared with glimepiride on carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial
.
JAMA
2006
;
296
:
2572
2581
40.
Saremi
A
,
Schwenke
DC
,
Buchanan
TA
, et al
.
Pioglitazone slows progression of atherosclerosis in prediabetes independent of changes in cardiovascular risk factors
.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2013
;
33
:
393
399
41.
Miyazaki
Y
,
Mahankali
A
,
Matsuda
M
, et al
.
Effect of pioglitazone on abdominal fat distribution and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2002
;
87
:
2784
2791
42.
Miyazaki
Y
,
Mahankali
A
,
Wajcberg
E
,
Bajaj
M
,
Mandarino
LJ
,
DeFronzo
RA
.
Effect of pioglitazone on circulating adipocytokine levels and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004
;
89
:
4312
4319
43.
Tripathy
D
,
Clement
SC
,
Schwenke
DC
, et al
.
Baseline adiponectin levels do not influence the response to pioglitazone in ACT NOW
.
Diabetes Care
2014
;
37
:
1706
1711
44.
Filipova
E
,
Uzunova
K
,
Kalinov
K
,
Vekov
T
.
Effects of pioglitazone therapy on blood parameters, weight and BMI: a meta-analysis
.
Diabetol Metab Syndr
2017
;
9
:
90
45.
Alam
F
,
Islam
MA
,
Mohamed
M
, et al
.
Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
.
Sci Rep
2019
;
9
:
5389
46.
Clarke
GD
,
Solis-Herrera
C
,
Molina-Wilkins
M
, et al
.
Pioglitazone improves left ventricular diastolic function in subjects with diabetes
.
Diabetes Care
2017
;
40
:
1530
1536
47.
Schernthaner
G
,
Matthews
DR
,
Charbonnel
B
,
Hanefeld
M
;
Quartet Study Group
.
Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone versus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized trial
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004
;
89
:
6068
6076
48.
Bray
GA
,
Smith
SR
,
Banerji
MA
, et al
.
Effect of pioglitazone on body composition and bone density in subjects with prediabetes in the ACT NOW trial
.
Diabetes Obes Metab
2013
;
15
:
931
937
49.
Kovacs
CS
,
Seshiah
V
,
Swallow
R
, et al.;
EMPA-REG PIO™ Trial Investigators
.
Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add-on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
.
Diabetes Obes Metab
2014
;
16
:
147
158
50.
Gautam
A
,
Agrawal
PK
,
Prakash
P
,
Hazra
DK
.
Pioglitazone associated pedal edema resolved by adding sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor [Abstract]
.
Diabetes
2016
;
65
(
Suppl. 1
):
140-LB
51.
Bazelier
MT
,
de Vries
F
,
Vestergaard
P
, et al
.
Risk of fracture with thiazolidinediones: an individual patient data meta-analysis
.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
2013
;
4
:
11
52.
Erdmann
E
,
Song
E
,
Spanheimer
R
,
van Troostenburg de Bruyn
AR
,
Perez
A
.
Observational follow-up of the PROactive study: a 6-year update
.
Diabetes Obes Metab
2014
;
16
:
63
74
53.
Lewis
JD
,
Habel
LA
,
Quesenberry
CP
, et al
.
Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer and other common cancers in persons with diabetes
.
JAMA
2015
;
314
:
265
277
54.
Filipova
E
,
Uzunova
K
,
Kalinov
K
,
Vekov
T
.
Pioglitazone and the risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
.
Diabetes Ther
2017
;
8
:
705
726
55.
American Diabetes Association
.
9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020
.
Diabetes Care
2020
;
43
(
Suppl. 1
):
S98
S110
56.
Abdul-Ghani
MA
,
Puckett
C
,
Triplitt
C
, et al
.
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT): a randomized trial
.
Diabetes Obes Metab
2015
;
17
:
268
275
57.
Tripathy
D
,
Daniele
G
,
Fiorentino
TV
, et al
.
Pioglitazone improves glucose metabolism and modulates skeletal muscle TIMP-3-TACE dyad in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, mechanistic study
.
Diabetologia
2013
;
56
:
2153
2163
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.