Skip to Main Content
TABLE 3

Proportional hazard analysis: risk predictors for type 2 diabetes in different models (Pima Indians, NGT at baseline, n = 413; conversion to diabetes events, n = 62)

Odds ratio 95% confidence limitsP
Model 1   
 Log BCDI 5.67 (2.13–15.10) <0.001 
 Log DI 0.07 (0.03–0.18) <0.001 
Model 2   
 Percent body fat 1.04 (1.00–1.07) 0.046 
 Log BCDI 3.94 (1.36–11.48) 0.01 
 Log DI 0.09 (0.04–0.25) <0.001 
Model 3   
 Age 0.98 (0.94–1.02) 0.36 
 Sex 0.57 (0.29–1.13) 0.11 
 Percent body fat 3.59 (1.33–9.62) 0.01 
 Log BCDI 3.13 (1.03–9.53) 0.04 
 Log DI 0.09 (0.03–0.25) <0.001 
Odds ratio 95% confidence limitsP
Model 1   
 Log BCDI 5.67 (2.13–15.10) <0.001 
 Log DI 0.07 (0.03–0.18) <0.001 
Model 2   
 Percent body fat 1.04 (1.00–1.07) 0.046 
 Log BCDI 3.94 (1.36–11.48) 0.01 
 Log DI 0.09 (0.04–0.25) <0.001 
Model 3   
 Age 0.98 (0.94–1.02) 0.36 
 Sex 0.57 (0.29–1.13) 0.11 
 Percent body fat 3.59 (1.33–9.62) 0.01 
 Log BCDI 3.13 (1.03–9.53) 0.04 
 Log DI 0.09 (0.03–0.25) <0.001 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal