Performance on the N-back task
| . | Participants with type 1 diabetes . | Control subjects . | 95% CI (lower, upper) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (% correct) | −0.025, −0.005 | ||
| 0-back | 97.6 (96.4, 1.0) | 98.8 (96.4, 1.0) | |
| 1-back | 95.2 (88.1, 97.6) | 97.6 (92.9, 1.0) | |
| 2-back | 83.3 (76.2, 88.1) | 83.3 (81.0, 88.1) | |
| Reaction time to correct trials (ms) | −28.864, 18.452 | ||
| 0-back | 617.5 (549.9, 733.9) | 656.1 (561.9, 764.5) | |
| 1-back | 689.9 (593.3, 793.0) | 682.5 (587.8, 816.9) | |
| 2-back | 781.2 (650.5, 913.6) | 747.5 (666.4, 887.3) | |
| d′ | −0.536, −0.090 | ||
| 0-back | 4.9 (3.6, 6.2) | 4.9 (3.6, 6.2) | |
| 1-back | 3.9 (2.9, 4.6) | 4.6 (3.3, 6.2) | |
| 2-back | 2.3 (1.4, 3.2) | 2.8 (1.9, 3.5) |
| . | Participants with type 1 diabetes . | Control subjects . | 95% CI (lower, upper) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (% correct) | −0.025, −0.005 | ||
| 0-back | 97.6 (96.4, 1.0) | 98.8 (96.4, 1.0) | |
| 1-back | 95.2 (88.1, 97.6) | 97.6 (92.9, 1.0) | |
| 2-back | 83.3 (76.2, 88.1) | 83.3 (81.0, 88.1) | |
| Reaction time to correct trials (ms) | −28.864, 18.452 | ||
| 0-back | 617.5 (549.9, 733.9) | 656.1 (561.9, 764.5) | |
| 1-back | 689.9 (593.3, 793.0) | 682.5 (587.8, 816.9) | |
| 2-back | 781.2 (650.5, 913.6) | 747.5 (666.4, 887.3) | |
| d′ | −0.536, −0.090 | ||
| 0-back | 4.9 (3.6, 6.2) | 4.9 (3.6, 6.2) | |
| 1-back | 3.9 (2.9, 4.6) | 4.6 (3.3, 6.2) | |
| 2-back | 2.3 (1.4, 3.2) | 2.8 (1.9, 3.5) |
Group values are presented as median (25th, 75th percentile). Significance of between-group differences across working memory loads is displayed as the bootstrap-based 95% CI with controlling for age and sex. See main text for details on statistical methods.