Skip to Main Content
Table 6 —

Multiple logistic regression anaysis with CHD as a dependent variable and the presence of the metabolic syndrome* or its individual components as independent variables in subjects with complete data (n = 2,401)

NGT (n = 1,136)
IFG/IGT (n = 488)
Type 2 diabetes (n = 777)
RRPRRPRRP
The metabolic syndrome* 1.73 0.04 1.82 0.06 2.23 <0.001 
Obesity 1.15 0.68 1.79 0.26 1.48 0.20 
Dyslipidemia 1.68 0.13 1.34 0.41 1.84 0.001 
Hypertension 2.33 <0.001 1.08 0.82 1.31 0.16 
Microabluminuria 0.65 0.59 0.59 0.44 0.94 0.81 
Insulin resistance 1.13 0.71 2.18 0.06 0.76 0.34 
NGT (n = 1,136)
IFG/IGT (n = 488)
Type 2 diabetes (n = 777)
RRPRRPRRP
The metabolic syndrome* 1.73 0.04 1.82 0.06 2.23 <0.001 
Obesity 1.15 0.68 1.79 0.26 1.48 0.20 
Dyslipidemia 1.68 0.13 1.34 0.41 1.84 0.001 
Hypertension 2.33 <0.001 1.08 0.82 1.31 0.16 
Microabluminuria 0.65 0.59 0.59 0.44 0.94 0.81 
Insulin resistance 1.13 0.71 2.18 0.06 0.76 0.34 

Adjusted for age and sex.

*

The metabolic syndrome was defined based on the recent WHO proposal (17);

defined as the highest quartile of HOMA.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal