Skip to Main Content
Table 3—

Differences in cardiovascular risk factor levels, patient satisfaction, and quality of care with a 1-point increment in the sum of care processes

OutcomeMean differenceLower 95% posterior boundUpper 95% posterior bound
Cardiometabolic risk factor levels    
    SBP (mmHg) −0.55 −2.49 1.47 
    A1C (%) 0.06 −0.20 0.33 
    HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 0.71 −0.41 1.89 
    LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) −4.51 −7.58 −1.46 
    CHD risk score (%)* −0.62 −1.61 0.32 
Patient satisfaction scales    
    CHS (2–6 scale) 0.15 0.05 0.26 
    GNC (2–6 scale) 0.07 0.00 0.13 
    HDC (4–12 scale) 0.32 0.12 0.51 
    Quality-of-care rating (1–5 scale) 0.22 0.13 0.32 
OutcomeMean differenceLower 95% posterior boundUpper 95% posterior bound
Cardiometabolic risk factor levels    
    SBP (mmHg) −0.55 −2.49 1.47 
    A1C (%) 0.06 −0.20 0.33 
    HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 0.71 −0.41 1.89 
    LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) −4.51 −7.58 −1.46 
    CHD risk score (%)* −0.62 −1.61 0.32 
Patient satisfaction scales    
    CHS (2–6 scale) 0.15 0.05 0.26 
    GNC (2–6 scale) 0.07 0.00 0.13 
    HDC (4–12 scale) 0.32 0.12 0.51 
    Quality-of-care rating (1–5 scale) 0.22 0.13 0.32 

Excludes participants without baseline chart data (3,107) or missing exposures (3,107 missing all exposures, plus 87 additional participants missing only influenza vaccination).

*

Difference in 10-year predicted probability of a CHD event (24,25).

Likert-style rating system: 1 = ′poor;′ 2 = ′fair;′ 3 = ′good;′ 4 = ′very good;′ 5 = ′excellent.′

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal