Table 2—

Relationships between the VAT and ASAT partial volumes at each intervertebral space with the corresponding total VAT and ASAT volume measures

Region of measure (cm3)Total VAT Volume (T10-T11 to L5-S1) (l)
Total ASAT volume (T10–T11 to L5–S1) (l)
R2SEE (%)R2SEE (%)
T10–T11 0.68a 0.85 (27.7)a 0.85a 0.52 (14.2)a 
T11–T12 0.69a 0.82 (26.9)a 0.89b 0.45 (12.3)b 
T12–L1 0.90b 0.47 (15.5)b 0.94c 0.34 (9.2)c,d 
L1–L2 0.96c 0.29 (9.6)c 0.95d 0.29 (7.8)d,e 
L2–L3 0.96c 0.31 (10.1)c 0.96d 0.26 (7.2)e 
L3–L4 0.91b 0.44 (14.3)b 0.94c 0.32 (8.7)c,d 
L4–L5 0.80d 0.65 (21.6)d 0.92e 0.38 (10.5)b,c 
L5–S1 0.65a 0.88 (28.8)a 0.80a 0.59 (16.1)a 
Region of measure (cm3)Total VAT Volume (T10-T11 to L5-S1) (l)
Total ASAT volume (T10–T11 to L5–S1) (l)
R2SEE (%)R2SEE (%)
T10–T11 0.68a 0.85 (27.7)a 0.85a 0.52 (14.2)a 
T11–T12 0.69a 0.82 (26.9)a 0.89b 0.45 (12.3)b 
T12–L1 0.90b 0.47 (15.5)b 0.94c 0.34 (9.2)c,d 
L1–L2 0.96c 0.29 (9.6)c 0.95d 0.29 (7.8)d,e 
L2–L3 0.96c 0.31 (10.1)c 0.96d 0.26 (7.2)e 
L3–L4 0.91b 0.44 (14.3)b 0.94c 0.32 (8.7)c,d 
L4–L5 0.80d 0.65 (21.6)d 0.92e 0.38 (10.5)b,c 
L5–S1 0.65a 0.88 (28.8)a 0.80a 0.59 (16.1)a 

All correlations were significant at P <0.001. Significant differences in the correlation coefficients within a given column (P < 0.05), as determined using the Hotelling method, are depicted by different superscript letters. Significant differences in SEE within a given column (P < 0.05), as determined using the Pitman’s test, are depicted by different superscript letters.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal