Table 1

Discriminating ability (all subjects with diabetes vs. control subjects) of cZ scores

Number of variables in cZ score*Subjects with diabetes (n = 66) Mean ± SDControl subjects (n = 35) Mean ± SDP valueAbnormal number of subjects with diabetes, n (%)
Autonomic score 40 0.49 ± 0.56 0.05 ± 0.37 0.000005 16 (24) 
CAN score 12 0.46 ± 0.71 0.06 ± 0.40 0.0005 20 (30) 
Pupillometry score 28 0.50 ± 0.64 0.04 ± 0.43 0.00004 11 (17) 
Thermal detection score 0.76 ± 0.96 0.13 ± 0.84 0.001 15 (23) 
NCS 1.70 ± 1.14 0.44 ± 0.86 3.7E-07 48 (73) 
Number of variables in cZ score*Subjects with diabetes (n = 66) Mean ± SDControl subjects (n = 35) Mean ± SDP valueAbnormal number of subjects with diabetes, n (%)
Autonomic score 40 0.49 ± 0.56 0.05 ± 0.37 0.000005 16 (24) 
CAN score 12 0.46 ± 0.71 0.06 ± 0.40 0.0005 20 (30) 
Pupillometry score 28 0.50 ± 0.64 0.04 ± 0.43 0.00004 11 (17) 
Thermal detection score 0.76 ± 0.96 0.13 ± 0.84 0.001 15 (23) 
NCS 1.70 ± 1.14 0.44 ± 0.86 3.7E-07 48 (73) 

P values from two-group Student t test.

†Based on normal cZ mean + 2 SD.

‡Combining CAN and pupillometry scores.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal